gabriele renzi
2/25/2005 6:21:00 AM
Daniel Berger ha scritto:
> gabriele renzi wrote:
> <snip>
>
>>see the existing RCR, #277 IIRC. Maybe I should add your code (if you
>
>
>>allow me to do it), but I'm out of time ATM :/
>>Anyway, I guess a C patch to current ruby would have more chance to
>
> be
>
>>accepted :)
>>Oh, and I definitely agree with you a Map mixin would be great :)
>
>
> I think you meant RCR #278, Hash#collect_to_hash. RCR #277 is 'Make
> def return something useful', which you should support, because I wrote
> it. ;)
actually, RCR261. But I definitely support your RCR :)
> I've always wondered if it would have been better to have a List
> superclass from which classes like Array and Hash would be subclasses.
in this case I disagree, since it would be an almost empty class, I think.
I like the idea of having easy to use mixin much more than the one about
a reasonable class hierarchy :)