[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Ruby Development Tool (RDT) project for Eclipse help

Paul Wistrand

2/19/2005 1:09:00 PM

Hi,
I've reproduced my posting below to the RDT forum over at sourceforge in
the hope that I might get some response. Is anyone using RDT?

"Hi, I've installed the RDT 0.5 using the Eclipse Update Manager but
straight away there are inconsistencies between what I'm seeing in my IDE
and what the documentation details. This has left my unsure if the RDT has
installed correctly.

Firstly checking Windows > Preferences I can see no Installed Interpreters
page under the Ruby branch.

Secondly when I choose to run the application when the run configuration
dialog is displayed there is no configuration type for ruby applications.

I'm running Eclipse 3.0.1 on Win2K."

Thanks
Paul


5 Answers

Alexey Verkhovsky

2/19/2005 1:39:00 PM

0

Paul Wistrand wrote:

>Firstly checking Windows > Preferences I can see no Installed Interpreters
>page under the Ruby branch.
>
>Secondly when I choose to run the application when the run configuration
>dialog is displayed there is no configuration type for ruby applications.
>
>
There are certainly problems in your installation.

--
Best regards,

Alexey Verkhovsky

Ruby Forum: http://ruby... (moderator)
RForum: http://rforum.and... (co-author)
Instiki: http://i... (maintainer)



Rasmus Debitsch

2/19/2005 1:43:00 PM

0

Hi,

it seems, that something with the installation is wrong. On my machine

XP, Eclipse 3.0.1, RDT 0.5.0, German localization

the installed interpreters preference page shows up and there is a
configuration type apps. Debugging Ruby apps works fine, too. I used
http://rubyeclipse.sf.net/... in the Eclipse update dialog.

Rasmus


"Paul Wistrand" <pwistrand@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:42173a31$0$32613$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
> Hi,
> I've reproduced my posting below to the RDT forum over at sourceforge
> in
> the hope that I might get some response. Is anyone using RDT?
>
> "Hi, I've installed the RDT 0.5 using the Eclipse Update Manager but
> straight away there are inconsistencies between what I'm seeing in my IDE
> and what the documentation details. This has left my unsure if the RDT has
> installed correctly.
>
> Firstly checking Windows > Preferences I can see no Installed Interpreters
> page under the Ruby branch.
>
> Secondly when I choose to run the application when the run configuration
> dialog is displayed there is no configuration type for ruby applications.
>
> I'm running Eclipse 3.0.1 on Win2K."
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
>


David Corbin

2/19/2005 4:09:00 PM

0

On Saturday 19 February 2005 08:09 am, Paul Wistrand wrote:
> Hi,
> I've reproduced my posting below to the RDT forum over at sourceforge
> in the hope that I might get some response. Is anyone using RDT?

>
> "Hi, I've installed the RDT 0.5 using the Eclipse Update Manager but
> straight away there are inconsistencies between what I'm seeing in my IDE
> and what the documentation details. This has left my unsure if the RDT has
> installed correctly.


As others have said, and you've deduced, you have an installation problem of
some type. How did you it? Using the udpateSite? I've never seen it go
wrong that way - (in about 6 viewings).

David


Paul Wistrand

2/20/2005 7:52:00 PM

0

I tried a manual install and everything came right. I seemed to recall that
the first time I tried it using the update manager my internet connection
went down mid install. I then tried again and it appeared to install
correctly but obviously not.

"David Corbin" <dcorbin@machturtle.com> wrote in message
news:200502191107.14512.dcorbin@machturtle.com...
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 08:09 am, Paul Wistrand wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've reproduced my posting below to the RDT forum over at
sourceforge
> > in the hope that I might get some response. Is anyone using RDT?
>
> >
> > "Hi, I've installed the RDT 0.5 using the Eclipse Update Manager but
> > straight away there are inconsistencies between what I'm seeing in my
IDE
> > and what the documentation details. This has left my unsure if the RDT
has
> > installed correctly.
>
>
> As others have said, and you've deduced, you have an installation problem
of
> some type. How did you it? Using the udpateSite? I've never seen it go
> wrong that way - (in about 6 viewings).
>
> David
>
>


AleXX

2/26/2009 8:48:00 AM

0

Australia:

DISGRACED former Federal Court judge Marcus Einfeld is pocketing an
annual $200,000 pension from the public purse, a court has heard.
Wayne Roser, SC, for the Crown, said the loss of Einfeld's title of
Queen's Counsel had not affected his pension, which related to his
previous judicial position.

Mr Roser was making submissions in the NSW Supreme Court today in
support of the Crown's call for Einfeld to receive a full-time jail term.

The retired 69-year-old judge has pleaded guilty to perjury and lying to
pervert the course of justice in a bid to avoid a speeding ticket.

Mr Roser described the counts as in the "worst case category" of those
offences, particularly noting Einfeld was not unfamiliar with the law.


Pro PAP wrote:
> On Feb 26, 9:13 am, watiz...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 12:47 am, AleXX <somed...@wherecanyougetsogooddeal.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Home > Breaking News > Singapore > Story
>>> Feb 24, 2009
>>> 'Worst insult possible'
>>> THREE men who wore T-shirts depicting a kangaroo dressed in judge's
>>> robes last year presented the worst form of insult possible against the
>>> court system here by calling it a 'kangaroo court'.
>>> Justice Judith Prakash, who sentenced them to jail terms last November
>>> after finding them to be in contempt of court, said in her written
>>> judgment that their conduct showed a wilful and stubborn contempt for
>>> the integrity of the courts.
>>> It was also designed to degrade the administration of justice here, she
>>> said in her judgment released on Tuesday.
>>> 'The imputation that the Singapore courts are 'kangaroo courts' was a
>>> serious and scurrilous insult that struck at the foundation, the body
>>> and the spirit of the justice system in Singapore,' she said in
>>> explaining her decision and sentencing.
>>> 'The message was that justice cannot be obtained in our courts and that
>>> our legal proceedings are a sham.'
>>> Describing their actions as the worst form of insult possible against
>>> the court system, she said it merited a harsher punishment than that
>>> imposed previously.
>>> 'It was imperative that a clear message be sent to potential contemnors
>>> that such attacks on the judiciary are not acceptable,' she said.
>>> The trio in question were John Tan Liang Joo, 47, assistant
>>> secretary-general of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP); activist
>>> Isrizal Mohamed Isa, 33; and full-time national serviceman Muhammad
>>> Shafi'ie Syahmi Sariman, 20.
>>> They wore the T-shirts when they attended a High Court hearing involving
>>> the SDP and its leaders last year.
>>> In her 11-page judgment, Justice Prakash said a reasonable person who
>>> saw the T-shirts would conclude it was a reference to the expression
>>> 'kangaroo court' - and was intended to cast aspersions on conduct of the
>>> hearings the trio attended, and the justice system here.
>>> Read the full report in Wednesday's edition of The Straits Times.
>> Serve them right. These three stooges played the clowns just as Liar
>> truth would want them to. They had their fun, now is pay back time.
>> Who is laughing now ?????
>>
>> Liar truth is laughing his tail off in his secret hideout down south,
>> address unknown.
>>
>> Any more idiots ?????
>>
>> Hahaha ..... !!!!!
>>
>> ROTFLOL ..... !!!!!
>
> Sometimes you have to respect people's judgment at large. If the
> majority opinion or consensus that the PAP's courts are indeed
> kangaroo courts, just let it be. This is in tally for our professed
> democracy to the world. Although I am a Pro PAP and respected our PAP
> government madly and blindly just like you and Lobert the monkey, I
> still think in line with the public that most of Singapore's highly
> respectable courts are in fact kangaroo courts. Or watizzit you are
> thinking?