[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Really confused about exceptions now

Mark Probert

2/10/2005 7:56:00 PM


On top of the memory leak issue, I have been trying to track down unhandled
exceptions in my code. I have run across a very strange behavior that I will
try and explain.

Problem(?) code (line numbers from bsn_a.rb)

141 def alive?
142 t = TCPSocket.new(@host, @port)
143 return true
144
145 rescue Errno::ETIMEDOUT
146 @exception = " Timed out (#{@host}:#{@port})"
147 rescue SocketError => e
148 @exception = " Socket error - #{e}"
149 rescue Exception => e
150 @exception = e
151 return false
152 end

So, in a test driver, it all works as expected with junk data:

11:42 (kant)$ ruby test.rb
.. trying to go to Foo (Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar)
--> failed Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar
.. trying to go to Foo (Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar)
--> failed Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar

However, in my actual program, something really bizarre happens:

11:43 (kant)$ ruby healthcollect.rb -g -n eeua.txt -c flow.txt -d data
.. Running 10 commands on 2 nodes.
.. Data going into directory --> data/20050210_1145_eeua
.. processing the nodes... (thread count=35)
.. threading now ...
.. trying to go to Foo (Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar)
Exception `SocketError' at ./bsn_a.rb:142 - getaddrinfo: hostname nor
servname provided, or not known
.. trying to go to Bar (Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar)
Exception `SocketError' at ./bsn_a.rb:142 - getaddrinfo: hostname nor
servname provided, or not known
Exception `SocketError' at /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/telnet.rb:352 -
getaddrinfo: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
Exception `SocketError' at /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/telnet.rb:352 -
getaddrinfo: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
Exception `SocketError' at /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/telnet.rb:360 -
getaddrinfo: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
--> failed Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar
Exception `SocketError' at /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/telnet.rb:360 -
getaddrinfo: hostname nor servname provided, or not known
--> failed Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar

Telnet is throwing a 'SocketError' and line 142 is throwing one, and neither
are being caught!

Now, if I comment out 147-148, I get the following from the program:

11:44 (kant)$ ruby healthcollect.rb -g -n eeua.txt -c flow.txt -d data
.. Running 10 commands on 2 nodes.
.. Data going into directory --> data/20050210_1144_eeua
.. processing the nodes... (thread count=35)
.. threading now ...
.. trying to go to Foo (Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar)
Exception `SocketError' at ./bsn_a.rb:142 - getaddrinfo: hostname nor
servname provided, or not known
.. trying to go to Bar (Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar)
Exception `SocketError' at ./bsn_a.rb:142 - getaddrinfo: hostname nor
servname provided, or not known
--> failed Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar
--> failed Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar

So, it throws the exception at line 142, but Telnet exception goes away!?!

Can anyone shed any light on what is happening here? I really have no clue on
how to proceed at this point.

As far as I can tell, the test driver is an accurate model of the 'real'
program -- it is threaded, it has the same class hierarchy, it includes the
same libraries, it just doesn't have all the pre- and post-processing in it.
They are both including the same 'bsn_a.rb'.

11:52 (kant)$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd5.3]

Regards,

--
-mark. (probertm at acm dot org)
42 Answers

Jim Freeze

2/10/2005 8:17:00 PM

0

* Mark Probert <probertm@acm.org> [2005-02-11 04:56:09 +0900]:

> On top of the memory leak issue, I have been trying to track down unhandled
> exceptions in my code. I have run across a very strange behavior that I will
> try and explain.
>
> Problem(?) code (line numbers from bsn_a.rb)
>
> 141 def alive?
> 142 t = TCPSocket.new(@host, @port)
> 143 return true
> 144
> 145 rescue Errno::ETIMEDOUT
> 146 @exception = " Timed out (#{@host}:#{@port})"
# returns a String, which is true.
> 147 rescue SocketError => e
> 148 @exception = " Socket error - #{e}"
# returns a String, which is true.
> 149 rescue Exception => e
> 150 @exception = e
> 151 return false
> 152 end

Just a quick note, your exceptions are returning true.

--
Jim Freeze
Code Red. Code Ruby

Mark Probert

2/10/2005 8:53:00 PM

0

Hi ..

On Thursday 10 February 2005 12:17, jim@freeze.org wrote:
>
> Just a quick note, your exceptions are returning true.

That doesn't seem to be the case. Just checked with:

12:43 (kant)$ cat test2.rb
#! /usr/local/bin/ruby
require 'socket'

def alive?(host, port=80)
t = TCPSocket.new(host, port)
return true
rescue Errno::ETIMEDOUT
puts " ERR: Timed out (#{host}:#{port})"
rescue SocketError => e
puts " ERR: Socket problem: #{e}"
rescue Exception => e
puts " ERR: #{e}"
return false
end

ip = ARGV[0]
f = alive?(ip)
if f
puts "got to #{ip}"
else
puts "failed (#{ip})"
end

12:45 (kant)$ ruby test2.rb "127.0.0.1"
got to 127.0.0.1

12:47 (kant)$ ruby test2.rb "foo"
ERR: Socket problem: getaddrinfo: hostname nor servname provided, or not
known
failed (foo)

I just commented out the 'return false', and that makes no difference to the
result. So, it seems that when the exception is called, the block returns
'nil'. Interesting.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,

--
-mark. (probertm at acm dot org)

Gennady

2/10/2005 9:26:00 PM

0

Mark Probert wrote:
> Hi ..
>
> On Thursday 10 February 2005 12:17, jim@freeze.org wrote:
>
>>Just a quick note, your exceptions are returning true.
>
>
> That doesn't seem to be the case. Just checked with:
>
> 12:43 (kant)$ cat test2.rb
> #! /usr/local/bin/ruby
> require 'socket'
>
> def alive?(host, port=80)
> t = TCPSocket.new(host, port)
> return true
> rescue Errno::ETIMEDOUT
> puts " ERR: Timed out (#{host}:#{port})"
> rescue SocketError => e
> puts " ERR: Socket problem: #{e}"
> rescue Exception => e
> puts " ERR: #{e}"
> return false
> end
>
> ip = ARGV[0]
> f = alive?(ip)
> if f
> puts "got to #{ip}"
> else
> puts "failed (#{ip})"
> end
>
> 12:45 (kant)$ ruby test2.rb "127.0.0.1"
> got to 127.0.0.1
>
> 12:47 (kant)$ ruby test2.rb "foo"
> ERR: Socket problem: getaddrinfo: hostname nor servname provided, or not
> known
> failed (foo)
>
> I just commented out the 'return false', and that makes no difference to the
> result. So, it seems that when the exception is called, the block returns
> 'nil'. Interesting.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Regards,
>
When you do not have explicit "return" statement in your rescue, the
execution falls down to the end of the method and returns whatever the
last executed statement had returned (FYI: puts() returns nil).

And in 'if' operator treats nil and false as false, everything else is true.

Gennady.

Mark Probert

2/10/2005 10:39:00 PM

0

Hi ..

On Thursday 10 February 2005 13:25, Gennady Bystritksy wrote:
>
> When you do not have explicit "return" statement in your rescue, the
> execution falls down to the end of the method and returns whatever the
> last executed statement had returned (FYI: puts() returns nil).
>
Thank you. So, a more correct version of the method is:

def alive?
begin
t = TCPSocket.new(@host, @port) ### line 143
return true

rescue Errno::ETIMEDOUT
@exception = " Timed out (#{@host}:#{@port})"
rescue SocketError => e
@exception = " Socket error - #{e}"
rescue Exception => e
@exception = e
end
return false
end

However, I still have the problem that this works in my test harness and not
in my actual code at the TCPSocket() call:


14:30 (kant)$ ruby test.rb
.. trying to go to Foo (Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar)
--> failed Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar
.. trying to go to Foo (Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar)
--> failed Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar

14:31 (kant)$ ruby healthcollect.rb -g -n eeua.txt -c flow.txt -d data
.. Running 10 commands on 2 nodes.
.. processing the nodes... (thread count=35)
.. threading now ...
.. trying to go to Foo (Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar)
Exception `SocketError' at ./bsn_a.rb:143 - getaddrinfo: hostname nor
servname provided, or not known
--> failed Foo:10.10.10.5:foo:bar
.. trying to go to Bar (Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar)
Exception `SocketError' at ./bsn_a.rb:143 - getaddrinfo: hostname nor
servname provided, or not known
--> failed Bar:10.10.10.6:foo:bar


I have no idea as to why the SocketError would be caught in one case and not
the other.

Regards,

--
-mark. (probertm at acm dot org)

N.Gubenko

12/2/2007 2:08:00 PM

0

GKP ?????:
> ??????, ?? ????? ???, ?? ????????? ? ??? ??? ????????? ???????? ????
> ???? ?? ???????...

???????? ??????? ? ??????, ???????? ??? ?? ???.

J@X

12/2/2007 3:25:00 PM

0

N.Gubenko ?????:
> GKP ?????:
>> ??????, ?? ????? ???, ?? ????????? ? ??? ??? ????????? ???????? ????
>> ???? ?? ???????...
>
> ???????? ??????? ? ??????, ???????? ??? ?? ???.
??????????.

sandrik

12/2/2007 3:57:00 PM

0

H?,? ?????.? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ????????? - ???? ??? ????,??????????
??????? ??? ????????.??? ????? ? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ? ??? ??
????????????
???? ??? ??? - welcome to TEAM FORTRESS 2

N.Gubenko

12/2/2007 4:01:00 PM

0

ZIK*FEL*DS ?????:
> ??? ????? ? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ? ??? ??
> ????????????

?????? ??? ????? ? ?????)

Krolik

12/2/2007 8:38:00 PM

0

???? ?????????? ????????????? ??? ?????-????? ???? ? ???.


SCORPION

12/2/2007 8:45:00 PM

0

Krolik ?????:
> ???? ?????????? ????????????? ??? ?????-????? ???? ? ???.
????, ? UA-IX ?? ?? ?????.
--
? ?????????, ??????? AKA SCORPION, Armagedec
Fan: [Scorpions] [Therion since 1996] [Helloween] [Gamma Ray] [Uli Jon Roth]
Fan: [Ferrari (F1, GT)] [Subaru (WRC)] [Yamaha (MotoGP, Superbike etc.)]
[!!! Lossless ftp://scorpion.nest.ntu-k... !!!]