[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.setup

VS2008 setup project causing unwanted .net 3.5 install

phrogg

1/17/2009 8:06:00 AM

There seems to be a significant prerequisite difference between the
deployment of a VS2005 Setup project that has been migrated to VS2008 vs. a
VS2008 Setup project created fresh in the new IDE. The migrated project
lists 2 prerequisites connected to Crystal Reports:
Crystal Reports Basic for VS2008 (x86, x64)
Crystal Reports for .NET Framework 2.0 (yellow error flag: prerequisite
could not be found for bootstrapping)
The project created in VS2008 doesn't include the second.

I have tried for hours to deploy the solution via InstallShield 2009 Express,
but have given up because I can't find a merge module for Crystal Reports
Basic for VS2008, so I'm back to the VS Setup project solution to deploy the
product. The windows application, which it is deploying, has its
compatibility set at .net 2.0 and has only .net 2.0 as a prerequisite. Both
the migrated and new 2008 setup projects similarly only have .net 2.0
specified as a prerequisite.

When I build the project using the migrated setup project, and deploy it to
a test machine that doesn't have Crystal Reports Basic for VS2008, the
installer automatically installs the Crystal Reports module and the setup is
a success. When I do the same deployment using the native 2008 setup project,
it insists on installing .net 3.5 with SP1 before attempting to install
Crystal Reports, and the .net 3.5 install fails. I believe that if it were
successful, it would also require a reboot. We do not want to force our
clients to install .net 3.5 and we certainly do not want to cause a reboot.

Nothing I have tried will remove the obligation to install .net 3.5 from a
build of the new 2008 setup project, even though it is not specified as a
prerequisite in any build configuration.

I appreciate any help,
Robert

url:http://www.ureader.com/gp/1...
5 Answers

Phil Wilson

1/19/2009 5:52:00 PM

0

If you look in the IDE of the setup project, launch conditions, .NET
framework, Properties window, what is the value of Version?

--
Phil Wilson
Definitive Guide to Windows Installer
http://www.apress.com/book/view/...


"robert clancy" <fake@email.com> wrote in message
news:dffc61ae65d64282b39730206cb6da5d@newspe.com...
> There seems to be a significant prerequisite difference between the
> deployment of a VS2005 Setup project that has been migrated to VS2008 vs.
> a
> VS2008 Setup project created fresh in the new IDE. The migrated project
> lists 2 prerequisites connected to Crystal Reports:
> Crystal Reports Basic for VS2008 (x86, x64)
> Crystal Reports for .NET Framework 2.0 (yellow error flag: prerequisite
> could not be found for bootstrapping)
> The project created in VS2008 doesn't include the second.
>
> I have tried for hours to deploy the solution via InstallShield 2009
> Express,
> but have given up because I can't find a merge module for Crystal Reports
> Basic for VS2008, so I'm back to the VS Setup project solution to deploy
> the
> product. The windows application, which it is deploying, has its
> compatibility set at .net 2.0 and has only .net 2.0 as a prerequisite.
> Both
> the migrated and new 2008 setup projects similarly only have .net 2.0
> specified as a prerequisite.
>
> When I build the project using the migrated setup project, and deploy it
> to
> a test machine that doesn't have Crystal Reports Basic for VS2008, the
> installer automatically installs the Crystal Reports module and the setup
> is
> a success. When I do the same deployment using the native 2008 setup
> project,
> it insists on installing .net 3.5 with SP1 before attempting to install
> Crystal Reports, and the .net 3.5 install fails. I believe that if it were
> successful, it would also require a reboot. We do not want to force our
> clients to install .net 3.5 and we certainly do not want to cause a
> reboot.
>
> Nothing I have tried will remove the obligation to install .net 3.5 from a
> build of the new 2008 setup project, even though it is not specified as a
> prerequisite in any build configuration.
>
> I appreciate any help,
> Robert
>
> url:http://www.ureader.com/gp/1...


bigot_cretin

6/5/2011 9:58:00 PM

0

On Jun 5, 10:47 pm, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 5, 10:35 pm, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> >> Saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I am trying to engage in a serious discussion point by point. I am
> >> > defeating Shitsack in argument, I have him by the balls, then you chip in
> >> > with your illiterate drunken garbage.
>
> >> Sorry, dude... I prefer women.
> > I suspect only dogs would go for a sack of shit such as yourself.
>
> Really?  
>
> That's fascinating.
>
Yes, dogs are interested in shit.

SaPeIsMa

6/5/2011 10:27:00 PM

0

"Saracene" <john.jsm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d7852d2c-128d-419f-8fc5-48b6265f479f@j25g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 5, 10:23 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SapeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Saracene" <john....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:47d4c865-8b06-4aeb-ae31-a8a0f6bc242a@c26g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 5, 9:12 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SapeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Saracene" <john....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:49306473-8b4a-44a9-9169-47225f1cd1d5@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jun 5, 8:38 pm, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> > > >> Oooooooooh, I'm sure a .22 LR would do the trick.....
>
> > > > You need to come up with some more original material.
>
> > > You need to get shot.
>
> > #
> > # In your ideal world would you arm all the Jews
> > # with big guns so they can kill anyone who utters a word agaisnt them?
> > #
>
> > Nice strawman
> > Too bad you got that wrong on so many aspects
>
> > 1) The ones who regularly go on rampages and kill innocents are the
> > Islamofascists, who'll go on a rampage, killing innocents for rumours or
> > peceived slights to their "honor"
> > That they have no "honor" because of their murderous behavior is
> > beyond their understanding
> > 2) The ONLY group that has acted with moderation in the Middle East are
> > the Jews.
> > Unlike the Arabs, they don't go around strapping bombs to themselves
> > to commit mass murder.
>
> > > > Ooooh the irony, Shitsack...
>
> > > What 'irony' would that be?
>
> > #
> > # Are you proclaiming yourself an extreme reactionary or not?
>
> > That's just you trying with another strawman.
>
> #
> # I was talking to Shitsack. You are digressing from the immediate
> # subject.
>
> Nah
> You were just being a stupid racist as usual..
> And since this is a public forum, my response was not only to but to all
> others who need to see what a racists asshat you really are..
#
# I am trying to engage in a serious discussion point by point. I am
# defeating Shitsack in argument, I have him by the balls, then you chip
# in with your illiterate drunken garbage.

Clearly you forgot to take your meds for that "delusions" problem you
have...
Too bad, you've only been whining since my original response still visible
in this post blew you out of the water..
But hey
Shouldn't expect much from an idiot who needs to use strawman arguments
the way you do.


SaPeIsMa

6/5/2011 10:28:00 PM

0

"Saracene" <john.jsm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6edd12c3-466f-47df-9786-dadeccefb0e2@f11g2000vbx.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 5, 10:34 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SapeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Saracene" <john....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:47d4c865-8b06-4aeb-ae31-a8a0f6bc242a@c26g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 5, 9:12 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SapeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Saracene" <john....@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:49306473-8b4a-44a9-9169-47225f1cd1d5@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jun 5, 8:38 pm, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> > > >> Oooooooooh, I'm sure a .22 LR would do the trick.....
>
> > > > You need to come up with some more original material.
>
> > > You need to get shot.
>
> > #
> > # In your ideal world would you arm all the Jews
> > # with big guns so they can kill anyone who utters a word agaisnt them?
> > #
>
> > Nice strawman
> > Too bad you got that wrong on so many aspects
>
> > 1) The ones who regularly go on rampages and kill innocents are the
> > Islamofascists, who'll go on a rampage, killing innocents for rumours or
> > peceived slights to their "honor"
> > That they have no "honor" because of their murderous behavior is
> > beyond their understanding
> > 2) The ONLY group that has acted with moderation in the Middle East are
> > the Jews.
> > Unlike the Arabs, they don't go around strapping bombs to themselves
> > to commit mass murder.
>
> > > > Ooooh the irony, Shitsack...
>
> > > What 'irony' would that be?
>
> > #
> > # Are you proclaiming yourself an extreme reactionary or not?
>
> > That's just you trying with another strawman.
>
> #
> # I was talking to Shitsack. You are digressing from the immediate
> # subject.
>
> Why do you need to prove to the world that you're a COMPLETE MORON ?
> Too many cousins marrying cousins over generations in your clan ?
#
# I pointed out the irrelevance of your post.
# What is moronic about that, shit-for-brains?

You just made a claim
You failed to DEMONSTRATE it.
Too bad you're too stupid to grasp the difference.



SaPeIsMa

6/5/2011 10:33:00 PM

0

"Saracene" <john.jsm@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:578e826f-9243-4fa3-8ec7-e0440725456a@v31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 5, 10:31 pm, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 5, 9:01 pm, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> >> Saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Jun 5, 8:38 pm, Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein <yitz...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> Oooooooooh, I'm sure a .22 LR would do the trick.....
>
> >> >> > You need to come up with some more original material.
>
> >> >> You need to get shot.
>
> >> > In your ideal world would you arm all the Jews with big guns so they
> >> > can kill anyone who utters a word agaisnt them?
>
> >> Of course not. Why would you imagine such a thing?
>
> >> >> > Ooooh the irony, Shitsack...
>
> >> >> What 'irony' would that be?
>
> >> > Are you proclaiming yourself an extreme reactionary or not?
>
> >> Of course not. What makes you ask that?
>
> > You appear to advocate capital punishment for anyone who expresses the
> > teeniest reservations about the power or character of the Jews.
>
> Do I?
>
> Where did I do that, then?
>
#
# You really are not very bright. Must I spell it out for you? Anyone
# who expresses the teeniest reservation you count as a Nazi. All Nazis,
# according to you deserve to be killed. Isn't that advocating capital
# punishment?

DOH !
Try again dummy.
Not ALL killing is "capital punishment"
Why don't you get a dictionary before you use any more words bigger than 4
letters.