[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

[ann] aeditor-2.1 (megacorp release

Simon Strandgaard

1/18/2005 10:42:00 PM

shots:
http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/aeditor_sho...
http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/aeditor_sho...


download:
http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/2674/aeditor-...


changes since 2.0:
* added folding
* added bookmarks


--
Simon Strandgaard

btw: This code is unittested
146 tests, 295 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
11 Answers

tsawyer

1/19/2005 12:30:00 AM

0

Simon, is it still dependednt on FOX? I couldn't find any info on
dependencies on the website.

The new look at website is nice BTW.

T.

Lothar Scholz

1/19/2005 3:13:00 AM

0

Hello Simon,

Your code is very short, so i'm curious which of the 16 points on your
webpage http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/buffer2/... are support by
the current implementation. I mean everything except 13,15 and 16
which are independent or a side-effect of the used datastructure.

And one specific question:
I never had an amiga, so i don't know what you mean with "the good old
Amiga multicolor fonts". Do you have any example screenshots of those
and maybe a URL of a webpage which describes formats and give some
example data/code ? With arachno ruby i also run into the situation
that sometimes some multicolor fonts might help . But doesn't they
forbid customization of color themes ?

I would like to start a discussion of editor implementation and also
share my experience but i'm not sure if the mailing list is such a
good place to do this.

--
Best regards, emailto: scholz at scriptolutions dot com
Lothar Scholz http://www.ru...
CTO Scriptolutions Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's

Richard Lyman

1/19/2005 3:20:00 AM

0

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:31:04 +0900, trans. <tsawyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Simon, is it still dependednt on FOX? I couldn't find any info on
> dependencies on the website.
>
> T.


I found a possible answer at the bottom of:

http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/dow...

I'm going with - yes, it requires FOX/FXRuby

-Rich

tsawyer

1/19/2005 3:29:00 AM

0

Sheesh. If it were a snake it would have bit me.
Thanks.

Martin DeMello

1/19/2005 4:39:00 AM

0

Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:
> I would like to start a discussion of editor implementation and also
> share my experience but i'm not sure if the mailing list is such a
> good place to do this.

I'd be interested in it, at any rate.

martin

Simon Strandgaard

1/19/2005 7:27:00 AM

0

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:31:04 +0900, trans. <tsawyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Simon, is it still dependednt on FOX? I couldn't find any info on
> dependencies on the website.

version 2.x depends on ruby 1.8.x and libncursesw.so.
There is no dependency on FOX.
Besides it expects that the term can render unicode glyphs.

Later I plan to do a GUI frontend.. where I maybe will use FOX or Wx
(its very difficult to decide which toolkit to use).


> The new look at website is nice BTW.

Thanks.

--
Simon Strandgaard

Simon Strandgaard

1/19/2005 7:48:00 AM

0

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:12:27 +0100, Lothar Scholz
<mailinglists@scriptolutions.com> wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> Your code is very short, so i'm curious which of the 16 points on your
> webpage http://aeditor.rubyforge.org/buffer2/... are support by
> the current implementation. I mean everything except 13,15 and 16
> which are independent or a side-effect of the used datastructure.

1. Bad caching: no caching at the moment.
I will add this when I add syntax coloring.

2. Optimized vertical scrolling: no caching at the moment.
I will add this when I add syntax coloring.

3. Robustness: ok. I have tested this carefully.
The model can only be modified via one function: replace.
The datastructure for the first time is rock solid.

4. Folding: ok

5. Optimized horizontal scrolling: not optimized.
I will add this when I add syntax coloring.

6. 2 Pass lexing: no lexing yet.

7. Multiple views: ok.

8. i18n: ok, this is my first editor that supports unicode.
(im interested in also adding big5 encoding).

9. prevent explosion of objects: ok.
I have reduced complex data structures to simple arrays, which are
easier to take snapshots of (for undo/redo). There is no undo/redo
implemented yet.. but things shouldn't produce that many objects.

10. live templates: not supported yet.
In both aeditor 0.x and 1.x I had editing strategies.
A similar setup which is enhanced a bit more is required.

11. Soft wordwrap: I don't want to support this.
This creates all sorts of puzzles. Maybe I will look more indepth on this
in the futurue. But don't expect anything here.

12. Rectangular Selections: not implemented yet.
Now when things are simpler then it should be easier to
implement.

13. Better GUI: undecided yet.

14. Nested Lexers: I have thought more about it.
There will be support for this, but nothing yet.

15. More Speed: ok.
maybe some caching a few places.

16. Simplify Things: ok.
things has been simplified.


[i got to goto my job]

--
Simon Strandgaard

Florian Gross

1/19/2005 12:24:00 PM

0

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

> Later I plan to do a GUI frontend.. where I maybe will use FOX or Wx
> (its very difficult to decide which toolkit to use).

I'd prefer wxRuby, personally.

tsawyer

1/19/2005 4:07:00 PM

0

Yeppy! I will download and try right away.

I'm all for a GUI version BTW, but I would like there to be both kinds
--a console version is very important too. I expect in time, aeditor
could b/c the default text editor for rubyx.

T.

Alexander Kellett

1/19/2005 4:40:00 PM

0

On Jan 19, 2005, at 5:11 PM, trans. wrote:
> Yeppy! I will download and try right away.
>
> I'm all for a GUI version BTW, but I would like there to be both kinds
> --a console version is very important too. I expect in time, aeditor
> could b/c the default text editor for rubyx.

i'll prob work on vim like keybindings
and a qt frontend. no time anymore for ruvi.

Alex