JeffP->
8/9/2006 9:06:00 PM
I too will be installing VS 2005 on a new XP Pro system, but I still need to
support some ASP.Net 2003 web apps.
My plan now is to install 2003 with 1.1, then install VS 2005 with 2.0.
I might think that the installation order from older to the newer version
would be how MS might have spent the most time debugging and therefore I will
have fewer issues.
Any additional heads-up is appreciated....
JeffP....
"J" wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up Rob. I totally appreciate it.
>
> Take care.
>
> J
>
>
> "Rob R. Ainscough" <robains@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:uE5NxTdoGHA.4152@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> > Installing 1.1 AFTER 2.0 caused me some problems with VS 2005 deployment
> > projects (Windows Installer) -- the fix was to uninstall 2.0 and
> > re-install 2.0 (this was on a test machine, not my dev machine).
> >
> > Rob.
> >
> > "J" <IDontLikeSpam@Nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:OQOBX0IoGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> >> Hello, I just installed the .net framework 2.0 successfully on our W2K
> >> Professional Server. I just realized that 1.1 and 2.0 are different and
> >> that 2.0 doesn't include 1.1 things. Is it ok for me to go ahead and
> >> install 1.1 after I've already installed 2.0?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >>
> >> J
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>