Ardanwen
12/16/2004 3:34:00 PM
First time trying to use ruby's benchmark module. Doing something
wrong,
----------
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:ruby bench-search.rb
user system total real
../benchmark.rb:148:in `times': undefined method `times' for
Process:Module (NameError)
----------
so I switched back to linux's "time bench-search.rb".
Re-rewrote your program to something that resembles mine more again,
and then
they're similarly slow again (n=50000).
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time bench-search.rb 7.430u 0.060s 0:07.99 93.7%
0+0k 0+0io 359pf+0w (david)
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time bench-search.rb 7.480u 0.010s 0:07.54 99.3%
0+0k 0+0io 348pf+0w (boris)
Not sure why you find something so different. Gutfeeling says it might
be because of your search size (3 chars instead of 5 chars, or the
specific search- and searched-string you use. Doing some testing right
now (n = 50000 though).
Now with a 5char nonchanging pattern, changing searched-string
[syntax: program pattern randomseed]
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 11111 1 8.210u 0.140s 0:08.43 99.0%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 11111 1 8.320u 0.100s 0:08.57 98.2%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 11111 2 7.920u 0.030s 0:07.98 99.6%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 11111 2 7.980u 0.020s 0:07.99 100.1%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 11111 3 4.760u 0.010s 0:04.77 100.0%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 11111 3 4.770u 0.020s 0:04.82 99.3%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 11111 1 7.780u 0.000s 0:07.79 99.8%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 11111 1 7.840u 0.000s 0:07.91 99.1%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 11111 2 7.530u 0.000s 0:07.58 99.3%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 11111 2 7.440u 0.000s 0:07.51 99.0%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 11111 3 5.450u 0.000s 0:05.42 100.5%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 11111 3 5.510u 0.000s 0:05.60 98.3%
Seems like searched-string pattern matters. Now look at search-string.
Specific search string you use matters quite a lot.
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 10101 1 9.520u 0.000s 0:09.52 100.0%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 10101 2 9.290u 0.010s 0:09.24 100.6%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time boris.rb 10101 3 8.620u 0.030s 0:08.70 99.4%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 10101 1 9.420u 0.000s 0:09.51 99.0%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 10101 2 8.710u 0.000s 0:08.78 99.2%
boris:falcon:~/SPEC:time david.rb 10101 3 8.540u 0.010s 0:08.79 97.2%
So not sure if that's enough to explain the difference between 1's and
0's and banana's. Another factor is the size of the search string, but
I grow a bit weary of testing :).
Anyway, thanks for testing. Time to look at that search-string link.
bench-search.rb
----------------------------------------
#! /usr/bin/env ruby
FIVE =
["00000","00001","00010","00011","00100","00101","00110","00111","01000","01001","01010","01011","01100","01101","01110","01111","10000","10001","10010","10011","10100","10101","10110","10111","11000","11001","11010","11011","11100","11101","11110","11111"]
str = ""
begin
str << "#{rand(2)}"
end until str.length == 1000
srand(1)
n = 50000
def boris(str)
pattern = FIVE[rand(32)]
c = 0
i = 1000
begin
i = str[0,i + 4].rindex(pattern)
c += 1 if i != nil
end until i == nil
c
end
def david(str)
pattern = FIVE[rand(32)]
str.scan(/(?=#{pattern})/).size
end
n.times { boris(str) }
#n.times { david(str) }
-----------------------------------------
boris.rb
------------------------
#! /usr/bin/env ruby
# This bit makes a string length 1000 filled with random 0's and 1's
srand(ARGV[1].to_i)
str = ""
begin
str << "#{rand(2)}"
end until str.length == 1000
# This is the method.
def boris(str)
c = 0
i = 1000
begin
i = str[0,i + 4].rindex(ARGV[0])
c += 1 if i != nil
end until i == nil
c
end
# Here we run it.
50000.times { boris(str) }
--------------------------
david.rb
------------
#! /usr/bin/env ruby
# This bit makes a string length 1000 filled with random 0's and 1's
srand(ARGV[1].to_i)
str = ""
begin
str << "#{rand(2)}"
end until str.length == 1000
# This is the method.
def david(str)
str.scan(/(?=#{ARGV[0]})/).size
end
# Here we run it.
50000.times { david(str) }
---------------------