[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Arachno users?

Its Me

11/11/2004 3:57:00 AM

Any Arachno IDE users out there? Do you mind sharing your opinion of the
product and how much you have used it? Private email is fine too.

Thanks!


15 Answers

Wayne Vucenic

11/11/2004 6:14:00 PM

0

I've been programming in Ruby for 3 years, and using ArachnoRuby for
about 6 months. I do contract programming, mostly in C++, but of
course I use Ruby as much as I can. Before ArachnoRuby, I was
severely limited in how much I could use Ruby professionally. I was
trying to use Ruby scripts to make changes to a code base of 5,000,000
(I'm quite serious!) lines of C++ code. At times the scripts would
run for about 30 minutes and then crash. If I was running outside the
debugger, I'd just get a stack trace and find myself back at the
command prompt. I tried running the script in the Ruby debugger, but
that slowed the script down too much. (I didn't benchmark it, but it
_felt_ like a factor of 10 slowdown.) I couldn't wait 5 hours to get
back to the point of failure.

I tried tracking down the problem outside the debugger: putting in
lots of print statements, etc. At times I'd spend literally an hour
or two tracking down the problem this way. Invariably, it would only
take a minute to fix the problem once I'd determined what the problem
was. Since I get paid by the hour, I simply couldn't justify billing
my client for spending a few hours tracking down a problem which would
have only taken a few minutes to fix if I'd had a better development
environment.

So, very reluctantly, I severely cut back on using Ruby for paid work.
I limited myself to small scripts that I knew I could easily debug if
necessary.

Then I discovered ArachnoRuby. It uses a different approach to
debugging Ruby, which is much faster than the usual way. This meant I
could once again write any Ruby script I wanted, and be confident of
being able to debug it.

For me, using ArachnoRuby has literally meant money in the bank. I
have been able to do paid work with ArachnoRuby which I would not have
been able to do without it.

I like a lot of things about ArachnoRuby besides the debugger. But
this post is already getting long, so let me just mention one more:

I've just started doing Web development with Ruby. ArachnoRuby
installs its own private copy of Apache, which it automatically starts
and stops when running a Ruby script. While running Apache you can
easily debug Ruby code: set breakpoints, single step, etc. It may be
possible to set something like this up without using ArachnoRuby, but
ArachnoRuby provides it with no additional setup.

(Of course, I have no financial or other relationship with
Scriptolutions (the company that makes ArachnoRuby) other than being a
_very_ happy user/beta tester.)

Wayne Vucenic
No Bugs Software
"Ruby and C++ Contract Programming in Silicon Valley"


On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:58:29 +0900, itsme213 <itsme213@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Any Arachno IDE users out there? Do you mind sharing your opinion of the
> product and how much you have used it? Private email is fine too.
>
> Thanks!
>
>


tony summerfelt

11/14/2004 8:36:00 PM

0

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:14:19 +0900, you wrote:

>I've been programming in Ruby for 3 years, and using ArachnoRuby for
>about 6 months.

does arachnoruby have code folding?

that's one of the reasons i like sctinilla based editors with ruby
support.

freeride seems to work ok until i try firing up the debugger it
crashes. i discovored freeride when it was at v0.6 and all versions up
to the latest have crashed on me...

for some reason it takes forever to even launch...longer than komodo
(which is really a beast but i like the interface and code folding)

http://home.cogeco.ca/~ts...
telnet://ventedspleen.dyndns.org



Curt Hibbs

11/14/2004 9:25:00 PM

0

tony summerfelt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:14:19 +0900, you wrote:
>
> >I've been programming in Ruby for 3 years, and using ArachnoRuby for
> >about 6 months.
>
> does arachnoruby have code folding?
>
> that's one of the reasons i like sctinilla based editors with ruby
> support.
>
> freeride seems to work ok until i try firing up the debugger it
> crashes. i discovored freeride when it was at v0.6 and all versions up
> to the latest have crashed on me...

What platform are you running on? If windows, are you running it with your
own version of Ruby or are you using the one shipped with FreeRIDE?

> for some reason it takes forever to even launch...longer than komodo
> (which is really a beast but i like the interface and code folding)

Thanks. The startup time is because its written entirely in Ruby (except
for the Scintilla-based editor).

Curt



Lothar Scholz

11/14/2004 9:32:00 PM

0

Hello tony,

ts> does arachnoruby have code folding?

Not yet but i'm working on it.


ts> for some reason it takes forever to even launch...longer than komodo
ts> (which is really a beast but i like the interface and code folding)

Can't verify this on my 2,8 GHz PIV

Komodo (2.3): 8 sec
ArachnoRuby (0.3): 5 sec
FreeRide (0.8): 3 sec

So there is maybe something wrong with your system.


--
Best regards, emailto: scholz at scriptolutions dot com
Lothar Scholz http://www.ru...
CTO Scriptolutions Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's




Curt Hibbs

11/14/2004 10:13:00 PM

0

Lothar Scholz wrote:
>
> ts> for some reason it takes forever to even launch...longer than komodo
> ts> (which is really a beast but i like the interface and code folding)
>
> Can't verify this on my 2,8 GHz PIV
>
> Komodo (2.3): 8 sec
> ArachnoRuby (0.3): 5 sec
> FreeRide (0.8): 3 sec
>
> So there is maybe something wrong with your system.

Thanks for the stats, I hadn't actually tried it!

Curt


T. Onoma

11/14/2004 10:31:00 PM

0

On Sunday 14 November 2004 05:12 pm, Curt Hibbs wrote:
| > Can't verify this on my 2,8 GHz PIV
| >
| > Komodo (2.3): 8 sec
| > ArachnoRuby (0.3): 5 sec
| > FreeRide (0.8): 3 sec

Is Arachno open-source?

T.

P.S. Maybe this was already brought up, but besides FreeRide there is Moderian
too. http://www.mondria... (FYI).


tony summerfelt

11/14/2004 10:55:00 PM

0

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 06:24:38 +0900, you wrote:

>What platform are you running on? If windows, are you running it with your
>own version of Ruby or are you using the one shipped with FreeRIDE?

that's a darn good question. i have two different ruby's installed.
one that at the time was the latest stable build (binary), one of the
snapshot builds i compiled myself.

i'm not sure what version was running because i just clicked on the
runw.bat file...

>Thanks. The startup time is because its written entirely in Ruby (except
>for the Scintilla-based editor).

startup time doesn't bother me...it was the debugger crash that was a
drag...
http://home.cogeco.ca/~ts...
telnet://ventedspleen.dyndns.org



Christoph R.

11/14/2004 11:09:00 PM

0

trans. (T. Onoma) schrieb:

>P.S. Maybe this was already brought up, but besides FreeRide there is Moderian
>too. http://www.mondria... (FYI).
>
>
Mondrain is probably the nicest (FreeRide never really worked on Windows
for me)
Ruby in Ruby IDE (maybe the nicest Ruby IDE period) and supposed be
turned in
to a Open source project soon - way to goo:-))

/Christoph


Curt Hibbs

11/14/2004 11:18:00 PM

0

Christoph wrote:
>
> trans. (T. Onoma) schrieb:
>
> >P.S. Maybe this was already brought up, but besides FreeRide
> there is Moderian
> >too. http://www.mondria... (FYI).
> >
> >
> Mondrain is probably the nicest (FreeRide never really worked on Windows
> for me)
> Ruby in Ruby IDE (maybe the nicest Ruby IDE period) and supposed be
> turned in
> to a Open source project soon - way to goo:-))

I'm not familiar with Ruby in Ruby, where can I find it?

Curt


gabriele renzi

11/14/2004 11:29:00 PM

0

Curt Hibbs ha scritto:


>>Mondrain is probably the nicest (FreeRide never really worked on Windows
>>for me)
>>Ruby in Ruby IDE (maybe the nicest Ruby IDE period) and supposed be
>>turned in
>>to a Open source project soon - way to goo:-))
>
>
> I'm not familiar with Ruby in Ruby, where can I find it?
>

I guess he meant 'mondrian is the nicest ruby in ruby ide'