Its Me
10/26/2004 7:39:00 PM
"George Moschovitis" <gm@navel.gr> wrote in message
news:clkqat$1q5a$1@ulysses.noc.ntua.gr...
> things I dont like: for example the way Rail forces the application
> design to the developer.
How do you mean?
> Nitro has a different focus. Nitro aims to
> be a framework for SCALABLE applications with many concurrent users
> online. Wherever possible we will try to optimize the rendering pipeline
> as much as posible and alway select the scalable way to implement
> features.
Do you mean Nitro prefers a pre-compile + cache approach over fully run-time
manipulation?
> However many features of Rails, like scaffolding and controllers will be
implemented
> soon.
That's great to hear.
> Btw the Builder aproach is something like Amrita and has nothing
> to do with Nitro .sx pages. Nitro .sx pages are something like php or
> jsp but FULLY xml compliant so you can use tools like xmlint to
> automatically validate files,
> use XSLT to pretansform them,
Or RexML on the .sx page, to continue working in Ruby?
> it is
> compatible with syntax highliting in editors etc.
Could I create a .sx page in Dreamweaver?
> I 'll include an example in a future version.
That would be a big help.
Thanks!