Mauricio Fernández
10/20/2004 11:48:00 PM
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:27:25PM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think `platform' would be better to be same as RUBY_PLATFORM.
Thank you. Fortunately nothing was really affected negatively by this,
but your patch has been applied and the new version made available as
rpa-base 0.2.2-8, so that the automatic self-update will get the fix.
> diff -ru2p rpa-base-0.2.2/lib/rpa/defaults.rb rpa-base-0.2.2+/lib/rpa/defaults.rb
> --- rpa-base-0.2.2/lib/rpa/defaults.rb 2004-07-10 17:12:15.000000000 +0000
> +++ rpa-base-0.2.2+/lib/rpa/defaults.rb 2004-10-19 07:09:03.000000000 +0000
> @@ -21,5 +21,5 @@ module RPA
> "rpa#{RPA::VERSION}")
> SITELIBDIR = File.join(RPA_BASE, ::Config::CONFIG['ruby_version'])
> - SO_DIR = File.join(SITELIBDIR, ::Config::CONFIG["target"])
> + SO_DIR = File.join(SITELIBDIR, ::Config::CONFIG["arch"])
> end
> end
> diff -ru2p rpa-base-0.2.2/lib/rpa/install.rb rpa-base-0.2.2+/lib/rpa/install.rb
> --- rpa-base-0.2.2/lib/rpa/install.rb 2004-09-05 18:40:10.000000000 +0000
> +++ rpa-base-0.2.2+/lib/rpa/install.rb 2004-10-19 07:08:38.000000000 +0000
> @@ -69,5 +69,5 @@ module Install
> #FIXME: full blown object?
> @metadata ||=
> - {'platform' => ::Config::CONFIG['target'],
> + {'platform' => ::Config::CONFIG['arch'],
> 'rpaversion' => RPA::VERSION,
> 'date' => Time.new.rfc2822}
--
Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com