Asp Forum - Problems running rails with WEBrick

Don Coleman

10/8/2004 4:50:00 PM

I'm having trouble getting rails to run through WEBrick. Is there a
step I'm missing here?

don@debian:~$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-08-24) [i386-linux]
don@debian:~$ gem list --local
*** LOCAL GEMS ***
actionpack (0.8.5)
activerecord (0.9.5)
rails (0.7.0)
rake (0.4.8)
sources (0.0.1)

don@debian:~$ mysqladmin create rails_production
don@debian:~$ mysqladmin create rails_test
don@debian:~$ rails ~/rails
don@debian:~$ cd rails
don@debian:~/rails$ sed -i '/^#!/{s,local/,,}'
public/dispatch.{cgi,fcgi,rb,servlet}
don@debian:~/rails$ sed -i '/^#!/{s,local/,,}' script/new_{controller,model}
don@debian:~/rails$ script/new_controller Test
don@debian:~/rails$ chmod +x public/dispatch.servlet
don@debian:~/rails$ public/dispatch.servlet
[2004-10-08 12:23:48] INFO WEBrick 1.3.1
[2004-10-08 12:23:48] INFO ruby 1.8.2 (2004-08-24) [i386-linux]
[2004-10-08 12:23:48] INFO WEBrick::HTTPServer#start: pid=5258 port=3000

http://localhost:3000 displays Congratulations, you're on Rails!
http://localhost:3000/test displays '/test' not found

If I run do a similar procedure for a rails app running through Apache2,
I'll get "No action responded to index" until I implement index in
test_controller.

14 Answers

Kevin Radloff

10/8/2004 5:21:00 PM

On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 01:50:21 +0900, Don Coleman
<dcoleman@chariotsolutions.com> wrote:
> http://localhost:3000 displays Congratulations, you're on Rails!
> http://localhost:3000/test displays '/test' not found
>
> If I run do a similar procedure for a rails app running through Apache2,
> I'll get "No action responded to index" until I implement index in
> test_controller.

The webrick servlet requires the trailing slash on "/test/". I believe
that's in the list of things to be fixed. ;)

--
Kevin 'radsaq' Radloff
http://s...

Don Coleman

10/8/2004 5:29:00 PM

> The webrick servlet requires the trailing slash on "/test/". I believe
> that's in the list of things to be fixed. ;)

The trailing slash did the trick. Thanks.

thomas p.

1/22/2012 10:40:00 PM

"Rockinghorse Winner" <rwinner@remove_this.hmamail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:slrnjhouch.6vs.rwinner@badass.edu...
>* It may have been the liquor talking, but
> DanielSan <danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/22/2012 12:00 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:jffruf$6vh$16@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/21/2012 4:48 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote...
>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 12:39 PM, Patrick wrote:
snip
>>> What caused the big bang?
>>
>> I don't know.
>
> If you don't know the very first cause of all, then you don't know what
> caused anything.

Nonsense, even if there was a first cause, and, so far, it is just an
assertion.

snip

--
thomas p

Ignorance is the mother of devotion.

David Hume

thomas p.

1/22/2012 10:42:00 PM

"Rockinghorse Winner" <rwinner@remove_this.hmamail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:slrnjhoujm.6vs.rwinner@badass.edu...
>* It may have been the liquor talking, but
> Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:00:08 -0500, "Patrick" <barker_pb@erinot.com>
>> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>>
>>>
>>>"DanielSan" <danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:jffruf$6vh$16@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/21/2012 4:48 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote...
snip

>>>What caused the big bang?
>>>
>> We do not know. This may be a temporary limit or a permanent one for
>> scientists. Of course you know that there isn't any evidence that any
>> gods had anything to do with it.
>
> Well, there is a great big hole of ignorance - what caused everything. Is
> it
> possible that this Mystery is not due to lack of knowledge primarily, but
> due to the nature of that Cause. IOW, the reason astrophysics always ends
> in mystery is that God IS Mystery.

Or is isn't.

>
> So, when we bump up against mystery in our investigations what we are
> actually bumping up against is God....

Or we aren't.

--
thomas p

Ignorance is the mother of devotion.

David Hume

DanielSan

1/22/2012 10:49:00 PM

On 1/22/2012 1:03 PM, Rockinghorse Winner wrote:
> * It may have been the liquor talking, but
> DanielSan<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/22/2012 12:00 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:jffruf$6vh$16@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/21/2012 4:48 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote...
>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 12:39 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What did he evolve from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean, what animal? Australopithecus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Australopithecus (Latin australis "southern", Greek ??????? pithekos
>>>>> "ape")
>>>>> is a genus of hominids that is now extinct. From the evidence gathered by
>>>>> palaeontologists and archaeologists, it appears that the Australopithecus
>>>>> genus evolved in eastern Africa around 4 million years ago before
>>>>> spreading
>>>>> throughout the continent and eventually becoming extinct 2 million years
>>>>> ago
>>>>> (wiki)
>>>>
>>>> Yup.
>>>>>>> How did that evolution take place?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mutation + Natural selection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>> You are merely working off a theory.
>>>>> A theory of some being 2 million years ago.
>>>>
>>>> Okay, first of all, are you exactly like your parents? If you put you and
>>>> your parents when they were your age together, would you be completely
>>>> identical? No? Are Asians, Africans, Europeans and Inuits identical in
>>>> appearance?
>>>>
>>>> Are you asserting that so-called "microevolution" doesn't exist now?
>>>>
>>>>>>> Where did it come from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ramapithecus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ramapithecus, fossil primate genus dating from the Middle and Late
>>>>> Miocene
>>>>> epochs (about 16.6 to 5.3 million years ago). For a time in the 1960s and
>>>>> '70s
>>>>> Ramapithecus was thought to be the first direct ancestor of modern
>>>>> humans.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://safe1.britannica.com/registrations/signup.do?partnerCode=100...
>>>>
>>>> Yep.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you get back to the beginning of time, let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, you want me to go outside the subject of evolution?
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't answer my question.
>>>>> I want to know about your belief in the beginning of TIME - where
>>>>> did it all start?
>>>>
>>>> I see. I have to go outside evolution, even before the beginning of
>>>> Earth? Fine.
>>>> It began with the Big Bang. Energy became matter which slowly collected
>>>> into stars and planets.
>>>> Next question?
>>>
>>> What caused the big bang?
>>
>> I don't know.
>
> If you don't know the very first cause of all, then you don't know what
> caused anything.

Not true. I know what caused this bag of Doritos I have sitting by my
computer. It was caused by workers in a factory in Plano, Texas that
add ingredients such as corn and spices to machines the form and bake
the chips, add the spices, bag it up, deliver it to stores, and sold it
to me.

All these causes and effects (one wouldn't happen without the other) I know.

But:

>> If you know, provide evidence for it. Not half-baked guessing or
>> conjecture: EVIDENCE.

DanielSan

1/22/2012 10:51:00 PM

On 1/22/2012 1:07 PM, Rockinghorse Winner wrote:
> * It may have been the liquor talking, but
> Free Lunch<lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:00:08 -0500, "Patrick"<barker_pb@erinot.com>
>> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>>
>>>
>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:jffruf$6vh$16@dont-email.me...
>>>> On 1/21/2012 4:48 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote...
>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 12:39 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What did he evolve from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean, what animal? Australopithecus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Australopithecus (Latin australis "southern", Greek ??????? pithekos
>>>>> "ape")
>>>>> is a genus of hominids that is now extinct. From the evidence gathered by
>>>>> palaeontologists and archaeologists, it appears that the Australopithecus
>>>>> genus evolved in eastern Africa around 4 million years ago before
>>>>> spreading
>>>>> throughout the continent and eventually becoming extinct 2 million years
>>>>> ago
>>>>> (wiki)
>>>>
>>>> Yup.
>>>>>>> How did that evolution take place?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mutation + Natural selection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove it.
>>>>> You are merely working off a theory.
>>>>> A theory of some being 2 million years ago.
>>>>
>>>> Okay, first of all, are you exactly like your parents? If you put you and
>>>> your parents when they were your age together, would you be completely
>>>> identical? No? Are Asians, Africans, Europeans and Inuits identical in
>>>> appearance?
>>>>
>>>> Are you asserting that so-called "microevolution" doesn't exist now?
>>>>
>>>>>>> Where did it come from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ramapithecus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ramapithecus, fossil primate genus dating from the Middle and Late
>>>>> Miocene
>>>>> epochs (about 16.6 to 5.3 million years ago). For a time in the 1960s and
>>>>> '70s
>>>>> Ramapithecus was thought to be the first direct ancestor of modern
>>>>> humans.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://safe1.britannica.com/registrations/signup.do?partnerCode=100...
>>>>
>>>> Yep.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you get back to the beginning of time, let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, you want me to go outside the subject of evolution?
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't answer my question.
>>>>> I want to know about your belief in the beginning of TIME - where
>>>>> did it all start?
>>>>
>>>> I see. I have to go outside evolution, even before the beginning of
>>>> Earth? Fine.
>>>> It began with the Big Bang. Energy became matter which slowly collected
>>>> into stars and planets.
>>>> Next question?
>>>
>>> What caused the big bang?
>>>
>> We do not know. This may be a temporary limit or a permanent one for
>> scientists. Of course you know that there isn't any evidence that any
>> gods had anything to do with it.
>
> Well, there is a great big hole of ignorance - what caused everything. Is it
> possible that this Mystery is not due to lack of knowledge primarily, but
> due to the nature of that Cause. IOW, the reason astrophysics always ends
> in mystery is that God IS Mystery.

No. You can't simply insert your guess into the gap in our knowledge.

Patrick

1/23/2012 12:09:00 AM

"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:duqoh7hp6t6trdii9bauuamdp77fq2diti@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:58:28 -0500, "Patrick" <barker_pb@erinot.com>
> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>
>>"DanielSan" <danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:jffr9c$6vh$14@dont-email.me...
>>> On 1/21/2012 4:40 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:jff77o$jn1$9@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 1/21/2012 12:26 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:jff20c$mau$10@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 6:09 AM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>> "DanielSan"<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:jfdb79$6o2$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 7:04 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 5:19 PM, Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "The Magpie"<usenet@pigsinspace.co.uk> wrote>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ummm. No - we would like something acceptable. But if it isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence then it isn't evidence. You do know what evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, where did you come from?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I came form my planets.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh, geez. That was terrible. Let me fix that:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I came from my parents."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pfeh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK then....
>>>>>>>> Where did your parents come from?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Their parents.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How did mankind evolve?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mutation + Natural selection.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ancestral species.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No. I think you need a refresher course in evolutionary biology and
>>>>>>> history.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + If you aren't equipped with enough of a brain to determine
>>>>>> the subject of the discussion, then you should stay home.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not the one that is having issues with parent-child reproduction.
>>>>
>>>> The human species has not been on this planet forever.
>>>
>>> Uh, no duh?
>>>
>>>> Next, you'll try to convince me that the human species
>>>> originated in Africa..... and yet you won't know where or why...
>>>
>>> That's what the evidence points to.
>>>
>>>> Do you really think that answers my question?
>>>
>>> What would you like to know?
>>>
>>>> Details on Au. sediba. Discovered in 2009 at a site called Malapa and
>>>> announced the following year, Australopithecus sediba is represented by
>>>> remarkably complete skeletons of an adult female and a juvenile male.
>>>> Attribution to the genus Australopithecus caused intense discussions
>>>> among
>>>> scientists because while the post crania are clearly australopithecine
>>>> but
>>>> the teeth and cranium exhibit features regarded by some scientists as
>>>> clearly Homo.
>>>> Ochre. In 2007 there came one of those announcements of which it can be
>>>> said
>>>> truly "the textbooks will have to be rewritten". A team working at
>>>> pinnacle
>>>> point on the South African coast east of Cape Town reported evidence of
>>>> the
>>>> use of shell fish as a food source and the use of ochre for body
>>>> decoration.
>>>> The dating was remarkably early: 164,000 years ago (OSL). In a recent
>>>> paper
>>>> also appearing in the journal Science we learn of a further ochre find,
>>>> in
>>>> this case from Blombas Cave, between Pinnacle Point and Cape Town.
>>>> This
>>>> was
>>>> announced by Christopher Henshilwood and his team and they established
>>>> the
>>>> dating by the OSL technique to be around 100,000 years ago. The
>>>> remarkable
>>>> aspect of this find was uncovering two abalone shells used as vessels
>>>> for
>>>> the preparation of the ochre. Curtis Marean leads the work at Pinnacle
>>>> Point
>>>> and he says of the Bombas Cave finds, "This is a fabulous result that
>>>> provides insights on how the ochre was processed. I think the dating
>>>> looks
>>>> great. "
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would you like a reference for this?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.becominghuman.org/node/news/fascinating-finds-so...
>>>
>>> Sounds good. I would've posted something like that to support my
>>> assertion.
>>
>>I enjoy posting crap for others to read.
>>Sometimes they even read it.
>>
> Too bad you don't enjoy posting facts instead of nonsense and lies.

I answer to the same intelligence level that the original poster showed.
I sumtimes has to get down to youse people's level.....for you to
understand.
You post bullshit. I will answer with the same.
You ask an intelligent question. I will answer it properly.

Patrick

1/25/2012 6:11:00 PM

"Ralph" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote
> I purchased a regular Kindle last fall. There are many free books
> available in addition to the ones that cost money. I am debating between
> the Fire and a pad of some type since my wife wants one.

Kindle Fire is $199.
Color Nook is about $250.
And I-Pad is $495.

Steve O

1/27/2012 11:56:00 AM

On 26/01/2012 10:06, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:11:21 -0800, DanielSan wrote:
>
>> On 1/25/2012 10:09 AM, Patrick wrote:
>>> "Kelsey Bjarnason"<kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oil4v8-pl4.ln1@spankydtr.localhost.net...
>>>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:57:40 -0500, Patrick wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alex Crisis"<chiefelf269@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:ei3nh7lsebi7ges3c0sjs5h1v4db397uva@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:34:29 -0500, "Patrick"<barker_pb@erinot.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <major snippage>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And here you are.
>>>>>>> Coming back for more....
>>>>>>> Tell me about fools again....?
>>>>>
>>>>>> And with that statement, Patrick condemns himself to Hell.. (...
>>>>>> cause Jesus said so. If you want the Bible references, Patrick, I
>>>>>> would be glad to supply it.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Another liar making shit up.
>>>>> Supply it.
>>>>
>>>> A hint: it's in Matthew.
>>>
>>> I'm waiting.....
>>
>> Fine. Matthew 5:22
>
> One must conclude that Patrick is not much of a Christian, as he's
> apparently never read the book upon which the belief system is based.
>
> Oh, wait... *most* of them haven't read the stupid thing. Never mind.
>

He actually suggested I could learn something about the Bible from him,
without realizing that I have learned far more about it over the years
from other atheists in this newsgroup than I could ever learn from any
deluded Christer.
Before he asks, here's an example...
....they never told me about Balaam's Ass when I was at Catholic Grammar
School

Patrick

1/27/2012 2:47:00 PM

"Steve O" <nospam@here.thanks> wrote...
> On 26/01/2012 10:06, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>>> On 1/25/2012 10:09 AM, Patrick wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Another liar making shit up.
>>>>>> Supply it.
>>>>>
>>>>> A hint: it's in Matthew.
>>>>
>>>> I'm waiting.....
>>>
>>> Fine. Matthew 5:22
>>
>> One must conclude that Patrick is not much of a Christian, as he's
>> apparently never read the book upon which the belief system is based.
>>
>> Oh, wait... *most* of them haven't read the stupid thing. Never mind.
>>
>
> He actually suggested I could learn something about the Bible from him,
> without realizing that I have learned far more about it over the years
> from other atheists in this newsgroup than I could ever learn from any
> deluded Christer.
> Before he asks, here's an example...
> ...they never told me about Balaam's Ass when I was at Catholic Grammar
> School

Did I say that?
It certainly sounds like something I might say.
Except that I didn't say it.
Plus, "Catholic Grammar School?"
Those are NOT words that would have come out of MY mouth.
I did NOT attend Catholic Grammar School.
If you are going to lie about me, you should be more careful.

comp.lang.ruby

Problems running rails with WEBrick

Don Coleman

Kevin Radloff

Don Coleman

thomas p.

thomas p.

DanielSan

DanielSan

Patrick

Patrick

Steve O

Patrick

x Login to ForumsZone