Gavin Sinclair
11/27/2003 6:26:00 AM
On Thursday, November 27, 2003, 10:50:47 AM, Peter wrote:
>> Will it also be possible to redefine wrapper methods? (I believe that's
>> what the original question intended) With primary methods it's obvious
>> which primary method is being redefined, but not with wrapper methods
>> since they stack.
> ... since they stack _and_ since are anonymous in a sense. If there are 5
> foo:pre methods, how can you indicate which one it is that you want to
> redefine? Or is it just no redefining, wrap-and-live-with-it?
Sounds like "wrap and live with it", which is OK by me.
Gavin