Asp Forum - Re: How does remoting handle broken links? - microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.remoting

retoro

8/30/2004 4:39:00 PM

I believe it will test and, if necessary, re-open a connection when a
remoting method is called as needed. However, if the connection dies in the
middle of a remoting call, then you'll get an exception and have to recover
from that yourself.

Ken

"David Palmer via .NET 247" <anonymous@dotnet247.com> wrote in message
news:uc1HYuPjEHA.2500@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hoe does remoting handle broken links? Does it try to recovery?
(especially if operating over
> WAN)
>
> --------------------------------
> From: David Palmer
>
> -----------------------
> Posted by a user from .NET 247 (http://www.dotn...)
>
> <Id>p2BBimNAq0q6WFhPNJkKcg==</Id>

4 Answers

duke

7/12/2013 3:54:00 PM

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:09:41 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>> If you reject the evidence as fast as I give it to you, no wonder you
>> believe the way you do.

>You have NEVER provided evidence. NEVER.

He just did, jdyke. You're not intelligent enough to comprehend.

The dukester, American - American

********************************************
Repeal Obama - most impotent president ever.
Five major US scandals and still going strong:
a)Fast/Furious,b)IRS,c)NSA d)News Phone Records,
e)Selective enforcement of environmental laws
********************************************

duke

7/12/2013 4:04:00 PM

On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:48:04 +1000, "Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
wrote:

>>"duke" wrote in message news:9n4tt81b36cssupd58mdh3b4qv8kp5k7r1@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:36:10 +1000, "Andrew W"
>><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>>"duke" wrote in message
>>>>news:f2mrt8p5msjs2qrid7i6qn1psmtps7snaf@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:35:18 +1000, "Andrew W"
>>>><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>"duke" wrote in message
>>>>>>news:4btnt8tksdaq8vcirai43o0mm96nlb27jh@4ax.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:54:18 +1000, "Andrew W"
>>>>>><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Have you yourself seen God and his eternal powers etc first hand?
>>>>>>>>>If not then you have a false excuse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Like electricity and gravity, no one as ever seen these, but we know
>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>their presence by the effects they have on the environment. Welcome
>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>God's
>>>>>>>>presence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yeah we see some effects, which have various explanations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Name one. I request you present a **valid** explanation for creation
>>>>>>other
>>>>>>than
>>>>>>God.
>>>>
>>>>>No human knows how creation was formed yet at this time, and that
>>>>>includes
>>>>>you.
>>>>
>>>>The clear fact that it was a CREATION leaves no doubt that it was the
>>>>will
>>>>of a
>>>>Supreme Creator. His name is God almighty.
>>
>>>Creation is just a name given to the universe by religion.
>>How stupid can a comment be?

>Its a simple truth that you couldn't even comment on due to your lack of
>intelligence.

God willed the universe into existence - something from nothing into
nothingness. My God did that. Your god is a zombie.

>>>But what is it really?
>>>The universe looks more like a debris field when you think about it.
>>>Why would God just make a debris field?
>>>What's its purpose?
>>To blow the minds of the ignorant.

>No useful answer again? Is that really the best you could do?

it's a facts. An explosive or expansive development will always look like a
debris field. Did you really think that stars and planets started life as they
look today, but just grown up?

>You say you talk to God every day. You should know something about this
>subject by now.
>Unless of course you are just delusional.

I've found you unable to understand my words.

>>>>>But we see no effects of a 'god' person.
>>>>God is his name, creation is his game.
>>>'God' is just a title and function.
>>>Spirits don't need names.
>>
>>Good, because nobody said a name was necessary
>?
>So now you suddenly say its not necessary, after insisting for years that
>'God' is his name?

It's not necessary for God to be his name to do what he did, you big dummy.

>>>>>On the other hand we do see the effects of different forms of energy on
>>>>>the world and universe.
>>>>Right, and where did they come from?
>>>Unknown at this time.
>>Wrong. The supreme creator, God almighty by name.
>How?
>Unless you can answer that, your claim is meaningless.

God has the eternal will to bring it all about.

>>>>WE.......know. You're hiding.
>>>Liar.
>>>No one can know for sure unless one has a time machine and can go back and
>>>ask him.
>>He demonstrates it to us, excluding you, every day.

>Rubbish. No one here was even alive when he was allegedly among us.
>You talk crap.

>>You reject the God of the bible. Don't try to claim you're doing right by
>>God.

>Everyone should question the "God of the bible" (sic).
>Its an ancient Hebrew patriarchal jealous and vengeful god figure.
>Get out of the past. Its the 21st century now.

OUr all loving God was seen as jealous and vengeful by Jews for hundreds of
years. Now we know God (my God, not yours) is all loving.

>>No, by loving and obeying God and loving and serving our neighbor in need -
>>both
>>of which you reject.

>Rubbish. I don't reject both.

Sure you do, zombie worshipper.

>But you can't love and serve both God and the people at the same time.
>Loving, obeying and serving a jealous and vengeful god figure divides
>people.

It's OBEY God and SERVE our neighbor in need, you ignorant child.

>That's why the middle east has been in a state of war and infighting for
>thousands of years.
>Do you want the western world to become like that too?

They, like you, reject the Christian God and his message.

The dukester, American - American

********************************************
Repeal Obama - most impotent president ever.
Five major US scandals and still going strong:
a)Fast/Furious,b)IRS,c)NSA d)News Phone Records,
e)Selective enforcement of environmental laws
********************************************

James

7/13/2013 11:21:00 AM

Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>In article <2d9tt8581s34vit6a7292f1dacmmlfschc@4ax.com>,
> James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:
>
>> Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> >In article <lq5ot8dhqisfk65fkbn8flvaesqnsi8l0j@4ax.com>,
>> > James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> >> >In article <42ejt899c9d7m0ldjip3r69glg21211i4n@4ax.com>,
>> >> > James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> >> >> >In article <irrgt81stqnhf98eio5u4ed952jkioopmp@4ax.com>,
>> >> >> > James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "W.T.S." <m14m@earthlink.net>
>> >> >> >> >In article <7ivft8lgq5hiv9vjhklkgmdcbnsntn2d1b@4ax.com>,
>> >> >> >> >duckgumbo32
>> >> >> >> >@cox.net says...
>> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 02:40:26 -0700, r@somis.org (?RLMeasures)
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >In article <MPG.2c4161d134fd0e1398c283@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> >> >> >> >> >m14m@earthlink.net wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> <http://my.earthlink.net/article/int?guid=20130705/c5...
>> >> >> >> >> >> f-4
>> >> >> >> >> >> b04
>> >> >> >> >> >> -
>> >> >> >> >> >> 9a47-68da88c4fb1f>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> http://tinyurl.c...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Catholicism wants an 11 year old girl forced-birthed. This
>> >> >> >> >> >> abomination
>> >> >> >> >> >> is happening the world over. When Catholicism rears its ugly
>> >> >> >> >> >> head,
>> >> >> >> >> >> women and children suffer and die.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> > The driving force behind RCC mistakes is the org's hubris and
>> >> >> >> >> > its
>> >> >> >> >> >inability to admit that the pope is really not infallible.
>> >> >> >> >> >(1870)
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Yet there is no mistake. Infallible statements by the Pope total
>> >> >> >> >> 2
>> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> 2000
>> >> >> >> >> years. And the requirement that the statement be strongly
>> >> >> >> >> suggested
>> >> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> >> scripture is firm in place.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> The Immaculate Conception of the BVM and her elevation to heaven
>> >> >> >> >> are
>> >> >> >> >> strongly
>> >> >> >> >> suggested in Luke. And so the Pope, under the guidance of the
>> >> >> >> >> Holy
>> >> >> >> >> Spirit,
>> >> >> >> >> declared it God's truth for Catholics.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> You're really starting to "faulter" over your lacking of
>> >> >> >> >> knowledge
>> >> >> >> >> about
>> >> >> >> >> things
>> >> >> >> >> on which you wish to pass judgment.
>> >> >> >> >The Church set a new level of "wrong" when it declared its power to
>> >> >> >> >interfere in the reproductive rights of women. The Pope and his
>> >> >> >> >sock
>> >> >> >> >puppet screwed the pooch big time on that one!
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> The pukester, KKKatholiKKK Stool.
>> >> >> >> >> ********************************************
>> >> >> >> >> Renounce, denounce and repudiate Catholicism!
>> >> >> >> >> It's too degenerate to ever fix.
>> >> >> >> >> ********************************************
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >We are indeed Carcinoma Sapiens, destroying, by insane fecundity,
>> >> >> >> >that
>> >> >> >> >which we need to survive.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >As always, organized religion opposes progress -
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >See what RELIGION does to peoples' minds:
>> >> >> >> >http://tinyurl.c...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Adults no longer believe in the Tooth Fairy - but they still
>> >> >> >> >torture
>> >> >> >> >and
>> >> >> >> >kill each other over ancient myths and superstitions.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"We all remember how many religious wars were fought for a religion
>> >> >> >> >of
>> >> >> >> >love
>> >> >> >> >and gentleness; how many bodies were burned
>> >> >> >> >alive with the genuinely kind intention of saving souls from the
>> >> >> >> >eternal
>> >> >> >> >fire of hell." --- Karl Popper
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity.
>> >> >> >> >When
>> >> >> >> >many
>> >> >> >> >people suffer from a delusion, it is called Religion."
>> >> >> >> > --- Robert M. Pirsig
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Either God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or he can but does not
>> >> >> >> >want
>> >> >> >> >to.
>> >> >> >> >If he wants to but cannot he is impotent. If he can
>> >> >> >> >but does not want to, he is wicked. If he neither can nor wants to,
>> >> >> >> >then
>> >> >> >> >he
>> >> >> >> >is both powerless and wicked.
>> >> >> >> >--- Epicurus, Greek philosopher, circa 300 B.C.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Act of God" disasters like the Japanese earthquake expose the
>> >> >> >> >myth.
>> >> >> >> >Either
>> >> >> >> >God can do nothing to stop catastrophes like
>> >> >> >> >this, or he doesn't care to, or he doesn't exist. He is thus either
>> >> >> >> >impotent, evil, or imaginary.
>> >> >> >> >--- CNN Belief Blog, 3-20-11
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"With or without religion, you would have good people doing good
>> >> >> >> >things
>> >> >> >> >and
>> >> >> >> >evil people doing evil things. But for good people
>> >> >> >> >to do evil things, that takes religion."
>> >> >> >> >--- Steven Weinberg, quoted in The New York Times, April 20, 1999
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it
>> >> >> >> >from
>> >> >> >> >religious conviction." --- Blaise Pascal.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as
>> >> >> >> >false,
>> >> >> >> >and by rulers as useful."
>> >> >> >> >--- Seneca the Younger (4? BC - 65 AD)
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Religion once ruled the world. It was called the Dark Ages." ---
>> >> >> >> >Ruth
>> >> >> >> >Green.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings."
>> >> >> >> >---
>> >> >> >> >Victor Stenger.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"I don't believe in God because I don't believe in Mother Goose."
>> >> >> >> >---
>> >> >> >> >Clarence Darrow
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"As my ancestors are free from slavery, I am free from the slavery
>> >> >> >> >of
>> >> >> >> >religion." --- Butterfly McQueen
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Religion was invented when the first con-man met the first fool."
>> >> >> >> >-
>> >> >> >> >Mark
>> >> >> >> >Twain
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." --- Mark Twain
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant
>> >> >> >> >character
>> >> >> >> >in
>> >> >> >> >all fiction." --- Richard Dawkins
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >"Cult today, religion tomorrow."
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >You still haven't provided that objective, verifiable evidence that
>> >> >> >this
>> >> >> >god thing of yours exists. You cannot discuss it's qualities until you
>> >> >> >have done so.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Just look in the mirror at that sophisticated machine peering back at
>> >> >> you. Because you are a biological machine instead of a mechanical one,
>> >> >> for some reason you deny a creator.
>> >> >
>> >> >I do no such thing. I have 2 creators--my mother and my father.
>> >>
>> >> Have you seen their blueprints for the human body? If there was such a
>> >> thing, it would be more complex than the blueprints for the now
>> >> retired Space Shuttle
>> >
>> > Non sequitur much?
>>
>> I have already seen a partial 'blueprint' of the human body while in a
>> doctor's office. He had a large detailed chart of the circulatory
>> system of the human body up on the wall. If you study the thing in
>> detail you will see a super design of biological engineering. But that
>> is only one system contained in the human body. There are many others
>> such as the digestive system, immune system etc, each just as complex,
>> and all working in harmony with each other.
>>
>> No human could come close to designing such a thing. And humans have
>> intelligence! Yet, we are led to believe time and time again, that the
>> human body was put together by mindless forces over time. Well, all I
>> can respectfully say is, I also have a bridge in California that I can
>> sell you for a good price:)
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >> >> That biological machine is better
>> >> >> than mechanical ones. Yet if it was mechanical, it would be praised
>> >> >> for its construction, esp the human brain. If one demands a creator,
>> >> >> why not the other one?
>> >> >
>> >> >Because the human body is a kludge, not a well-designed "machine".
>> >>
>> >> When it was first created, it was perfect. Now we inherit
>> >> imperfections from our first father, Adam after he sinned.
>> >
>> >Nonsense. Complete and total nonsense.
>>
>> 'In your opion"
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> >> But it doesn't stop there. There are millions of life forms, all very
>> >> >> sophisticated, even the one-celled ones. It is a virtual factory going
>> >> >> on inside a cell. Where do you see mindless forces producing such
>> >> >> sophistication? In the rocks? If mindless forces made all these
>> >> >> things, then you should find caves complete with plumbing and
>> >> >> electricity etc. But you don't. You find just what you expect to find
>> >> >> from mindless forces. The results of matter responding to the laws of
>> >> >> physics in its environment, and producing nothing of sophistication.
>> >> >
>> >> >Gawd, you're stupid.
>> >>
>> >> Hopefully someday, you will take off those evolution glasses, and put
>> >> in the glasses of reality.
>> >
>> >The projection is strong in this one.
>> >
>> >There are mountains of evidence for the fact of evolution--fossils,
>> >morphology, and, most important, DNA.
>> >
>> >For your silliness, not one piece of evidence.
>>
>> If you reject the evidence as fast as I give it to you, no wonder you
>> believe the way you do.
>
>You have NEVER provided evidence. NEVER.

Each to his/her own.

James
John 4:23,24
www.jw.org

Andrew W

7/14/2013 11:18:00 AM

>"duke" wrote in message news:7m90u81pjpge4c31l7m6i20fghtrv7e3qm@4ax.com...
>
>On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:48:04 +1000, "Andrew W"
><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
>wrote:
>
>>>"duke" wrote in message
>>>news:9n4tt81b36cssupd58mdh3b4qv8kp5k7r1@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:36:10 +1000, "Andrew W"
>>><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>"duke" wrote in message
>>>>>news:f2mrt8p5msjs2qrid7i6qn1psmtps7snaf@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:35:18 +1000, "Andrew W"
>>>>><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>"duke" wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:4btnt8tksdaq8vcirai43o0mm96nlb27jh@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:54:18 +1000, "Andrew W"
>>>>>>><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Have you yourself seen God and his eternal powers etc first hand?
>>>>>>>>>>If not then you have a false excuse.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Like electricity and gravity, no one as ever seen these, but we
>>>>>>>>>know
>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>their presence by the effects they have on the environment.
>>>>>>>>>Welcome
>>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>>>God's
>>>>>>>>>presence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yeah we see some effects, which have various explanations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Name one. I request you present a **valid** explanation for creation
>>>>>>>other
>>>>>>>than
>>>>>>>God.
>>>>>
>>>>>>No human knows how creation was formed yet at this time, and that
>>>>>>includes
>>>>>>you.
>>>>>
>>>>>The clear fact that it was a CREATION leaves no doubt that it was the
>>>>>will
>>>>>of a
>>>>>Supreme Creator. His name is God almighty.
>>>
>>>>Creation is just a name given to the universe by religion.
>>>How stupid can a comment be?
>
>>Its a simple truth that you couldn't even comment on due to your lack of
>>intelligence.
>
>God willed the universe into existence - something from nothing into
>nothingness. My God did that.
>

Sweeping statements like that are largely meaningless.

>
> Your god is a zombie.
>

I don't worship Gods.
You are the zombie.

>
>>>>>>On the other hand we do see the effects of different forms of energy
>>>>>>on
>>>>>>the world and universe.
>>>>>Right, and where did they come from?
>>>>Unknown at this time.
>>>Wrong. The supreme creator, God almighty by name.
>>How?
>>Unless you can answer that, your claim is meaningless.
>
>God has the eternal will to bring it all about.
>

Just another blind sweeping statement.

>
>>>>>WE.......know. You're hiding.
>>>>Liar.
>>>>No one can know for sure unless one has a time machine and can go back
>>>>and
>>>>ask him.
>>>He demonstrates it to us, excluding you, every day.
>
>>Rubbish. No one here was even alive when he was allegedly among us.
>>You talk crap.
>
>>>You reject the God of the bible. Don't try to claim you're doing right
>>>by
>>>God.
>
>>Everyone should question the "God of the bible" (sic).
>>Its an ancient Hebrew patriarchal jealous and vengeful god figure.
>>Get out of the past. Its the 21st century now.
>
>OUr all loving God was seen as jealous and vengeful by Jews for hundreds of
>years. Now we know God (my God, not yours) is all loving.
>

You also still see God as jealous and vengeful because you believe that he
created a hell for eternal suffering just for choosing not to worship him as
one's master.
Only tyrants do that.
Only zombies need masters. That's you.

>
>>>No, by loving and obeying God and loving and serving our neighbor in
>>>need -
>>>both
>>>of which you reject.
>
>>Rubbish. I don't reject both.
>
>Sure you do, zombie worshipper.
>

Prove it.

>
>>But you can't love and serve both God and the people at the same time.
>>Loving, obeying and serving a jealous and vengeful god figure divides
>>people.
>
>It's OBEY God and SERVE our neighbor in need, you ignorant child.
>

Did you forget worship?
You can't serve your neighbour properly if you dedicate yourself to
worshipping a god and going to church all the time.

>
>>That's why the middle east has been in a state of war and infighting for
>>thousands of years.
>>Do you want the western world to become like that too?
>
>They, like you, reject the Christian God and his message.
>

The Christian message is manyfold.
Much of it is highly questionable.
Just obedience to an invisible judgemental god being causes more problems
than it solves because everyone has their own interpretations and views.

--
A god figure that tries to use fear, oppression and terror to win your love
and obedience is clearly a false god figure.
All legalistic and petty type religions that promote such gods like Judaism,
Christianity and Islam are nothing but false, controlling religions and
should be avoided.

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.remoting

Re: How does remoting handle broken links?

retoro

duke

duke

James

Andrew W

x Login to ForumsZone