[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.remoting

Re: Alternative to abstract class?

Sam Santiago

8/27/2004 5:35:00 AM

Is there any reason you did not want to use an interface? Check out this
link for an example of an SAO factory return CAO object to the client using
an interface, http://www.softitechture.com/d..., that I created a few
weeks ago when discussing remoting factories.

Thanks,

Sam

--
_______________________________
Sam Santiago
ssantiago@n0spam-SoftiTechture.com
http://www.SoftiTe...
_______________________________
"f00sion" <f00sion@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CFB3ACC1-FD23-4727-94F2-51FB70092E06@microsoft.com...
> I found a good tutorial of how to supply the objects without having
> the implementation files on the client. This was working great until I
> realized that I couldnt use any constructors with server activated
> objects, so I switched to client activated objects only to run into
> the next roadblock, doh! can't instantiate abstract classes... here is
> a simple example of the structure, im sure there is a way to do it to
> allow instantiation but I am not as knowledgeable of inheritance as I
> should be:
>
>
> namespace JLClient
>
> {
>
> public abstract class address : MarshalByRefObject
>
> {
>
> public abstract string foo{get;set;}
>
> public abstract string test();
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
> namespace JLBase
>
> {
>
> public class address : JLClient.address
>
> {
>
> public override string foo{get{return _foo;}set{_foo=value}}
>
> public override string test()
>
> { return "blah"; }
>
> private string _foo;
>
> }
>
> }
>
> The goal is for the client to only have the minimum of what they need in
the
> dll, and not our full implementation. Is there a way to do it using CAO
> without abstract classes?
>