microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.remoting

Mike

8/17/2004 2:18:00 AM

I'm new to remoting (duh, see previous post) but I'd be surprised if someone
hasn't already written a MemoryMappedFileChannel for remoting. (I'm
surprised there isn't one in the core classes.)

Apres google NB: Apparently www.genuinechannels.com has a local channel, in
addition to gobs of other stuff. (No relation, and no personal experience.)
Didn't see any free code for local channels.

m

"Sam Santiago" <ssantiago@n0spam-SoftiTechture.com> wrote in message
news:exNSB6KgEHA.3948@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> It depends on what you are trying to do and how you would like your apps
to
> communicate. You can always use other methods such as a common database,
> MSMQ, or a shared file. You can still use COM+ and create a serviced
> component used by both applications. And you can use remoting as well.
> Here's a link with some info and more links:
>
> Distributed App Communication
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vsent7/html/vxoriChoosingBusinessLogicTechno...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sam
>
> --
> _______________________________
> Sam Santiago
> ssantiago@n0spam-SoftiTechture.com
> http://www.SoftiTe...
> _______________________________
> "Alex Maghen" <AlexMaghen@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0408F2DD-A7F7-4DE9-A361-39424DE9A9C5@microsoft.com...
> > Hi. I've been reviewing the documentation on .NET Remoting and I have a
> > question: If the only type of inter-application communication will be
> between
> > two .NET applications on the same machine, is there any easier way to do
> this
> > than what's described in the Remoting documentation? I mean, is there no
> way
> > for Clases and Members made public to be accessible by other
applications
> the
> > way they used to be in plain old OLE applications? Just let me know so I
> can
> > start slogging through all this remoting stuff if it comes to that :)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Alex
>
>