Asp Forum - Testing code branching coverage

Carl Youngblood

11/4/2003 12:12:00 AM

I'm wondering if it might be possible to write ruby code that could
dynamically check my classes for branches and keep track of each branch
during execution so that it could tell me how good the code coverage of
different execution paths was. In other words, I could run my ruby
script and it would print out the number of branches taken versus the
total number of possible branches.

I noticed that the ruby profiler is all written in Ruby, so I was
thinking it might be possible to write code that would do this without
having to modify my code. However, I am nowhere near enough of a Ruby
expert to take this one on. Anybody have any ideas?

Thanks,
Carl

17 Answers

soc.culture.china

8/31/2010 4:12:00 AM

On Aug 30, 8:46 pm, ww <lbt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.4shared.com/photo/6CrJAsMH/258Troll_...

Hey!!! I need a lot of this stuff to remove one, the shit face
psychotic brainless shameless crazy sleazy slimy filthy evil ugly
abianchen/report2009/abum_chump slut cunt chattering monkey
pathological lying bitch from Manila.

his Excellency Itoh , the Japanese Advisor to the Manchu Imperial Government

8/31/2010 5:52:00 AM

Hey , Chairman Mao,

I , Itoh , was an advisor to the Manchu Imperial
government in Beijing
in the last century and
we Japanese
had proposed to the Chinese Republicans in the last century
for
Japanese co-ownership of Manchuria with your Chinese migrants in
Manchuria, which
was not Chinese territory .
Our Japanese Imperial government in the last century
proposed a
sphere of Joint Prosperity with your Chinese people in
Manchuria ,
but your Chinese migrants in Manchuria killed our Japanese
migrants in Manchuria ,
why ?
the Japanese migrants in Manchuria just wanted to share
Manchuria
with your Chinese migrants into Manchuria in the last
century .

The Japanese migrating people into Manchuria in the last
century
just wanted
a fair share of Manchurian territory with your
Chinese migrating people into Manchuria ,
why did your Chinese migrants in Manchuria killed our
Japanese migrating
people in Manchuria in the last century ?

why you Chinese wanted all Manchuria for yourselves Chinese ?
Manchuria was not even your Chinese territory .
Manchuria was Korean and Mongol and Manchu territories.

why did you Chinese migrants kill our Japanese migrants in
Manchuria
in the last century ?

why did your Chinese migrants kill the Dark skin Malays in
KL in 1969 in west Malaysia ?

why did your Chinese migrants kill native Uyghurs in Karshi
in Xin Jiang ?

why did your Chinese migrants kill Tibetans in Tibet ?

and Now , why you Chinese migrants are demanding a fair
share of ASEAN territories
with Dark Skin REAL natives of ASEAN ?

why you Chinese refused to share Manchuria with our Japanese
migrants in Manchuria
in the last century ,
why you Chinese are demanding a fair share of the wealth of
ASEAN with
Dark skin natives of ASEAN ?
you Chinese are just a
migrating people into ASEAN ?

Chairman Mao, we know you are a nationalist , because
the Manchu Jurchen people had stolen
China from the Chinese people.
but you Chinese migrants from China are stealing the native
lands of
the Dark skin REAL native people of ASEAN .

you Chinese knew full well that Manchuria wasn ' t even
Chinese territory .

you Chinese know full well that ASEAN is not Chinese
territory.

why are your millions of Chinese people occupying the
ASEAN territories ?

why are your Chinese migrants occupying the Spratleys ?

you Chinese have never been a native people of SE ASIA,

you Chinese have never been a native people of ASEAN ,

so
why are your Chinese people faking and pretending to be
the new Chinese native of ASEAN , just
like Wakalukong in Singapore ?

sine you Chinese are demanding a Chinese co-ownership of
ASEAN with
the Dark skin REAL natives of ASEAN ,

can we Japanese demand for a Japanese Co-ownership of
Taiwan with
your Chinese migrants in Taiwan ?

to be fair ,
you Chinese are all migrants outside China Central which
are
lands between the two rivers ,
the ChangJiang river in the north of China Central and
the Yellow river .in the south
of China Central .

to be fair , you Chinese should share Taiwan with our
Japanese people in Japan ,
because you Chinese in ASEAN are sharing ASEAN with the
Chinese people in China .

many Chinese in China are holding Singaporean passports ,
many Chinese in China are holding Malay' s passports ,
many Chinese in China are holding Filipino passports ,
many Chinese in China are holding Indonesian passports ,
many Chinese in China are holding Thai passports ,
many Chinese in China are holding Burmese passports,
many Chinese in China are holding Lao passports ,

so Chinese from ASEAN are living in China now ,
so China is already sharing ASEAN with the Dark Skin REAL
natives of ASEAN.

this week Aug . 2010 Chinese navy is in Myanmar ,
next century
Chinese navy will be all over ASEAN territorial water, which
you
Chinese are calling as your South CHINA SEA .

you Chinese are just hijacking ASEAN for your own Chinese
people in CHINA .

we Japanese are more docile in this century , still
living in in our own Nihon islands .

.

.

Aug 31, 7:55 am, "Chairman Mao , expert fucker of Chinese High
School Girl 's cunts in China" <monsteroooodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> our Chinese people have a strategy centuries ago to
> populated all lands south of China Central ,
>
> China Central was all lands in China Proper Central Plains
> north of the Chang Jiang River
> and south of the Yellow river ,
>
> our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territories which
> was all lands south of the Chang Jiang river which
> belonged to 100 tribes of ethnic Yue people who were not
> Chinese .
>
> Chinese are now calling Non - Chinese Yue territorie
> as their South China , which originally was not
> Chinese territory ,
> but Yue territory belonging to the Thai - Kadai,
> the Muongs, the Vietnamese , the Miao , the Malays ,
> the aborigene natives of Taiwan , etc......
>
> our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territory which our Chinese
> people
> are now calling as our Chinese South China some 6000 years
> ago
> during the Shang Dynasty because of copper mines in Jiang -Xi
> province ,
> west of Shanghai city .
>
> our Chinese migrating strategy is to occupy lands first and
> talk to negotiate later
> after our Chinese migrants have taken control of new lands
> south of China Central ,
> the Jews in Israel are just copying our Chinese migrating
> strategy
> of our Chinese migrants throughout history
> in SE Asia and in Western China.
>
> Thus countries like Myanmar , Malaysia , Laos , Tibet, XingJiang ,
> Inner Mongolia,
> were the targets of our Chinese migrants .
>
> 6000 years ago , our Chinese migrants from China Central pushed
> natives
> of Yue territories in Jiang-Xi , Wu-Nan ..west ,
> to Yun Nan , Quang - Xi , Kwei- Zhou ,
> that was why our Chinese migrants are able to call Yue
> territories
> as our South China,
>
> Today in the 21 st century , our Chinese migrants are SE Asia
> are
> calling SE Asia ASEAN as our New South China, because
> we Chinese have millions of
> our Chinese people in the Philippines, Singapore , Malaysia ,
> Thailand ,
> Myanmar , Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia , Brunei , Cambodia .
>
> our Chinese aim is to control first all lands in ASEAN and to
> negotiate later with
> all natives of ASEAN in order for us Chinese to co-own all
> ASEAN lands and seas with the Dark Skin REAL native of
> ASEAN ,
> our Chinese migrants now have the financial Power
> in all nations of ASEAN , and with Chinese financial help
> from Chjinese banks in China , our Chinese migrants shall
> demand a Chinese co-ownership of ASEAN ,.....
> just
> like the Japs had planned to do in the last century in SE
> Asia ,.
> this time ,
> it is our turn for our Chinese migrants to occupy lands of
> ASEAN ,
> because
> our Chinese nation will have the military power to threaten
> natives
> of ASEAN nations if nations of ASEAN refuse
> to conform to our Chinese demand for a fair share of the
> WEALTH
> of ASEAN for our Chinese people in ASEAN .
>
> that is why we Chinese are taking the Spratleys ,
> and our Chinese migrants who are the new Natives of Sabah
> shall declare Sabah ' s autonomy from the Malay ' s Power
> in Malayu in West Malaysia.
>
> http://www.sapp.org.my/beaufort/081222_en_be...
>
> Aug 29, 7:08 pm, ww <lbt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66205/robert-d-kapla......
>
> > The Geography of Chinese Power
> > How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea?
> > By Robert D. Kaplan
> > May/June 2010
>
> > Thanks to the country’s favorable location on the map, China's
> > in?uence is expanding on land and at sea, from Central Asia to the
> > South China Sea and from the Russian Far East to the Indian Ocean.
>
> > ROBERT D. KAPLAN is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American
> > Security and a correspondent for The Atlantic. His book Monsoon: The
> > Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power will be published in the
> > fall.
>
> > The English geographer Sir Halford Mackinder ended his famous 1904
> > article, "The Geographical Pivot of History," with a disturbing
> > reference to China. After explaining why Eurasia was the geostrategic
> > fulcrum of world power, he posited that the Chinese, should they
> > expand their power well beyond their borders, "might constitute the
> > yellow peril to the world's freedom just because they would add an
> > oceanic frontage to the resources of the great continent, an advantage
> > as yet denied to the Russian tenant of the pivot region." Leaving
> > aside the sentiment's racism, which was common for the era, as well as
> > the hysterics sparked by the rise of a non-Western power at any time,
> > Mackinder had a point: whereas Russia, that other Eurasian giant,
> > basically was, and is still, a land power with an oceanic front
> > blocked by ice, China, owing to a 9,000-mile temperate coastline with
> > many good natural harbors, is both a land power and a sea power.
> > (Mackinder actually feared that China might one day conquer Russia.)
> > China's virtual reach extends from Central Asia, with all its mineral
> > and hydrocarbon wealth, to the main shipping lanes of the Pacific
> > Ocean. Later, in Democratic Ideals and Reality, Mackinder predicted
> > that along with the United States and the United Kingdom, China would
> > eventually guide the world by "building for a quarter of humanity a
> > new civilization, neither quite Eastern nor quite Western."
>
> > China's blessed geography is so obvious a point that it tends to get
> > overlooked in discussions of the country's economic dynamism and
> > national assertiveness. Yet it is essential: it means that China will
> > stand at the hub of geopolitics even if the country's path toward
> > global power is not necessarily linear. (China has routinely had GDP
> > growth rates of more than ten percent annually over the past 30 years,
> > but they almost certainly cannot last another 30.) China combines an
> > extreme, Western-style modernity with a "hydraulic civilization" (a
> > term coined by the historian Karl Wittfogel to describe societies that
> > exercise centralized control over irrigation) that is reminiscent of
> > the ancient Orient: thanks to central control, the regime can, for
> > example, enlist the labor of millions to build major infrastructure.
> > This makes China relentlessly dynamic in ways that democracies, with
> > all of their temporizing, cannot be. As China's nominally Communist
> > rulers -- the scions of some 25 dynasties going back 4,000 years --
> > are absorbing Western technology and Western practices, they are
> > integrating them into a disciplined and elaborate cultural system with
> > a unique experience in, among other things, forming tributary
> > relationships with other states. "The Chinese," a Singaporean official
> > told me early this year, "charm you when they want to charm you, and
> > squeeze you when they want to squeeze you, and they do it quite
> > systematically."
>
> > China's internal dynamism creates external ambitions. Empires rarely
> > come about by design; they grow organically. As states become
> > stronger, they cultivate new needs and -- this may seem
> > counterintuitive -- apprehensions that force them to expand in various
> > forms. Even under the stewardship of some of the most forgettable
> > presidents -- Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Chester Arthur,
> > Benjamin Harrison -- the United States' economy grew steadily and
> > quietly in the late nineteenth century. As the country traded more
> > with the outside world, it developed complex economic and strategic
> > interests in far-flung places. Sometimes, as in South America and the
> > Pacific region, for example, these interests justified military
> > action. The United States was also able to start focusing outward
> > during that period because it had consolidated the interior of the
> > continent; the last major battle of the Indian Wars was fought in
> > 1890.
>
> > China today is consolidating its land borders and beginning to turn
> > outward. China's foreign policy ambitions are as aggressive as those
> > of the United States a century ago, but for completely different
> > reasons. China does not take a missionary approach to world affairs,
> > seeking to spread an ideology or a system of government. Moral
> > progress in international affairs is an American goal, not a Chinese
> > one; China's actions abroad are propelled by its need to secure
> > energy, metals, and strategic minerals in order to support the rising
> > living standards of its immense population, which amounts to about one-
> > fifth of the world's total.
>
> > To accomplish this task, China has built advantageous power
> > relationships both in contiguous territories and in far-flung locales
> > rich in the resources it requires to fuel its growth. Because what
> > drives China abroad has to do with a core national interest --
> > economic survival -- China can be defined as an über-realist power.. It
> > seeks to develop a sturdy presence throughout the parts of Africa that
> > are well endowed with oil and minerals and wants to secure port access
> > throughout the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea, which connect the
> > hydrocarbon-rich Arab-Persian world to the Chinese seaboard. Having no
> > choice in the matter, Beijing cares little about the type of regime
> > with which it is engaged; it requires stability, not virtue as the
> > West conceives of it. And because some of these regimes -- such as
> > those in Iran, Myanmar (also known as Burma), and Sudan -- are
> > benighted and authoritarian, China's worldwide scouring for resources
> > brings it into conflict with the missionary-oriented United States, as
> > well as with countries such as India and Russia, against whose own
> > spheres of influence China is bumping up.
>
> > To be sure, China is not an existential problem for these states. The
> > chance of a war between China and the United States is remote; the
> > Chinese military threat to the United States is only indirect. The
> > challenge China poses is primarily geographic -- notwithstanding
> > critical issues about
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Wakalukong

8/31/2010 6:54:00 AM

On Aug 31, 1:51 pm, "his Excellency Itoh , the Japanese Advisor to
the Manchu Imperial Government" <mussahassan.has...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hey , Chairman Mao,
>
> I , Itoh , was an advisor to the Manchu Imperial
> government in Beijing
> in the last century and
> we Japanese
> had proposed to the Chinese Republicans in the last century
> for
> Japanese co-ownership of Manchuria with your Chinese migrants in
> Manchuria, which
(snip)
------------

Who on Earth cares for a talking shit?

Wakalukong

the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha

8/31/2010 11:49:00 AM

Chaurman Mao,
can we Indians share Tibet with your Chinese migrants into
Tibet ?

can we Indians co-own Tibetan territories with your Chinese
migrants into Tibet ?

Aug 31, 7:55 am, "Chairman Mao , expert fucker of Chinese High
School Girl 's cunts in China" <monsteroooodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> our Chinese people have a strategy centuries ago to
> populated all lands south of China Central ,
>
> China Central was all lands in China Proper Central Plains
> north of the Chang Jiang River
> and south of the Yellow river ,
>
> our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territories which
> was all lands south of the Chang Jiang river which
> belonged to 100 tribes of ethnic Yue people who were not
> Chinese .
>
> Chinese are now calling Non - Chinese Yue territorie
> as their South China , which originally was not
> Chinese territory ,
> but Yue territory belonging to the Thai - Kadai,
> the Muongs, the Vietnamese , the Miao , the Malays ,
> the aborigene natives of Taiwan , etc......
>
> our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territory which our Chinese
> people
> are now calling as our Chinese South China some 6000 years
> ago
> during the Shang Dynasty because of copper mines in Jiang -Xi
> province ,
> west of Shanghai city .
>
> our Chinese migrating strategy is to occupy lands first and
> talk to negotiate later
> after our Chinese migrants have taken control of new lands
> south of China Central ,
> the Jews in Israel are just copying our Chinese migrating
> strategy
> of our Chinese migrants throughout history
> in SE Asia and in Western China.
>
> Thus countries like Myanmar , Malaysia , Laos , Tibet, XingJiang ,
> Inner Mongolia,
> were the targets of our Chinese migrants .
>
> 6000 years ago , our Chinese migrants from China Central pushed
> natives
> of Yue territories in Jiang-Xi , Wu-Nan ..west ,
> to Yun Nan , Quang - Xi , Kwei- Zhou ,
> that was why our Chinese migrants are able to call Yue
> territories
> as our South China,
>
> Today in the 21 st century , our Chinese migrants are SE Asia
> are
> calling SE Asia ASEAN as our New South China, because
> we Chinese have millions of
> our Chinese people in the Philippines, Singapore , Malaysia ,
> Thailand ,
> Myanmar , Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia , Brunei , Cambodia .
>
> our Chinese aim is to control first all lands in ASEAN and to
> negotiate later with
> all natives of ASEAN in order for us Chinese to co-own all
> ASEAN lands and seas with the Dark Skin REAL native of
> ASEAN ,
> our Chinese migrants now have the financial Power
> in all nations of ASEAN , and with Chinese financial help
> from Chjinese banks in China , our Chinese migrants shall
> demand a Chinese co-ownership of ASEAN ,.....
> just
> like the Japs had planned to do in the last century in SE
> Asia ,.
> this time ,
> it is our turn for our Chinese migrants to occupy lands of
> ASEAN ,
> because
> our Chinese nation will have the military power to threaten
> natives
> of ASEAN nations if nations of ASEAN refuse
> to conform to our Chinese demand for a fair share of the
> WEALTH
> of ASEAN for our Chinese people in ASEAN .
>
> that is why we Chinese are taking the Spratleys ,
> and our Chinese migrants who are the new Natives of Sabah
> shall declare Sabah ' s autonomy from the Malay ' s Power
> in Malayu in West Malaysia.
>
> http://www.sapp.org.my/beaufort/081222_en_be...
>
> Aug 29, 7:08 pm, ww <lbt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66205/robert-d-kapla......
>
> > The Geography of Chinese Power
> > How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea?
> > By Robert D. Kaplan
> > May/June 2010
>
> > Thanks to the country’s favorable location on the map, China's
> > in?uence is expanding on land and at sea, from Central Asia to the
> > South China Sea and from the Russian Far East to the Indian Ocean.
>
> > ROBERT D. KAPLAN is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American
> > Security and a correspondent for The Atlantic. His book Monsoon: The
> > Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power will be published in the
> > fall.
>
> > The English geographer Sir Halford Mackinder ended his famous 1904
> > article, "The Geographical Pivot of History," with a disturbing
> > reference to China. After explaining why Eurasia was the geostrategic
> > fulcrum of world power, he posited that the Chinese, should they
> > expand their power well beyond their borders, "might constitute the
> > yellow peril to the world's freedom just because they would add an
> > oceanic frontage to the resources of the great continent, an advantage
> > as yet denied to the Russian tenant of the pivot region." Leaving
> > aside the sentiment's racism, which was common for the era, as well as
> > the hysterics sparked by the rise of a non-Western power at any time,
> > Mackinder had a point: whereas Russia, that other Eurasian giant,
> > basically was, and is still, a land power with an oceanic front
> > blocked by ice, China, owing to a 9,000-mile temperate coastline with
> > many good natural harbors, is both a land power and a sea power.
> > (Mackinder actually feared that China might one day conquer Russia.)
> > China's virtual reach extends from Central Asia, with all its mineral
> > and hydrocarbon wealth, to the main shipping lanes of the Pacific
> > Ocean. Later, in Democratic Ideals and Reality, Mackinder predicted
> > that along with the United States and the United Kingdom, China would
> > eventually guide the world by "building for a quarter of humanity a
> > new civilization, neither quite Eastern nor quite Western."
>
> > China's blessed geography is so obvious a point that it tends to get
> > overlooked in discussions of the country's economic dynamism and
> > national assertiveness. Yet it is essential: it means that China will
> > stand at the hub of geopolitics even if the country's path toward
> > global power is not necessarily linear. (China has routinely had GDP
> > growth rates of more than ten percent annually over the past 30 years,
> > but they almost certainly cannot last another 30.) China combines an
> > extreme, Western-style modernity with a "hydraulic civilization" (a
> > term coined by the historian Karl Wittfogel to describe societies that
> > exercise centralized control over irrigation) that is reminiscent of
> > the ancient Orient: thanks to central control, the regime can, for
> > example, enlist the labor of millions to build major infrastructure.
> > This makes China relentlessly dynamic in ways that democracies, with
> > all of their temporizing, cannot be. As China's nominally Communist
> > rulers -- the scions of some 25 dynasties going back 4,000 years --
> > are absorbing Western technology and Western practices, they are
> > integrating them into a disciplined and elaborate cultural system with
> > a unique experience in, among other things, forming tributary
> > relationships with other states. "The Chinese," a Singaporean official
> > told me early this year, "charm you when they want to charm you, and
> > squeeze you when they want to squeeze you, and they do it quite
> > systematically."
>
> > China's internal dynamism creates external ambitions. Empires rarely
> > come about by design; they grow organically. As states become
> > stronger, they cultivate new needs and -- this may seem
> > counterintuitive -- apprehensions that force them to expand in various
> > forms. Even under the stewardship of some of the most forgettable
> > presidents -- Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Chester Arthur,
> > Benjamin Harrison -- the United States' economy grew steadily and
> > quietly in the late nineteenth century. As the country traded more
> > with the outside world, it developed complex economic and strategic
> > interests in far-flung places. Sometimes, as in South America and the
> > Pacific region, for example, these interests justified military
> > action. The United States was also able to start focusing outward
> > during that period because it had consolidated the interior of the
> > continent; the last major battle of the Indian Wars was fought in
> > 1890.
>
> > China today is consolidating its land borders and beginning to turn
> > outward. China's foreign policy ambitions are as aggressive as those
> > of the United States a century ago, but for completely different
> > reasons. China does not take a missionary approach to world affairs,
> > seeking to spread an ideology or a system of government. Moral
> > progress in international affairs is an American goal, not a Chinese
> > one; China's actions abroad are propelled by its need to secure
> > energy, metals, and strategic minerals in order to support the rising
> > living standards of its immense population, which amounts to about one-
> > fifth of the world's total.
>
> > To accomplish this task, China has built advantageous power
> > relationships both in contiguous territories and in far-flung locales
> > rich in the resources it requires to fuel its growth. Because what
> > drives China abroad has to do with a core national interest --
> > economic survival -- China can be defined as an über-realist power.. It
> > seeks to develop a sturdy presence throughout the parts of Africa that
> > are well endowed with oil and minerals and wants to secure port access
> > throughout the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea, which connect the
> > hydrocarbon-rich Arab-Persian world to the Chinese seaboard. Having no
> > choice in the matter, Beijing cares little about the type of regime
> > with which it is engaged; it requires stability, not virtue as the
> > West conceives of it. And because some of these regimes -- such as
> > those in Iran, Myanmar (also known as Burma), and Sudan -- are
> > benighted and authoritarian, China's worldwide scouring for resources
> > brings it into conflict with the missionary-oriented United States, as
> > well as with countries such as India and Russia, against whose own
> > spheres of influence China is bumping up.
>
> > To be sure, China is not an existential problem for these states. The
> > chance of a war between China and the United States is remote; the
> > Chinese military threat to the United States is only indirect. The
> > challenge China poses is primarily geographic -- notwithstanding
> > critical issues about
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Wakalukong

8/31/2010 3:08:00 PM

On Aug 31, 7:48 pm, the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking
Boudha <mahatmanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
------------

Who on Earth wants an empress with a black lean cock to teach him
geography? Ladies and gentlemen, are you now convinced that Black
Lean Cock is a moron?

Wakalukong

Khmer Rouge Hun Sen the Fake Communist now the Khmer Mafia Boss of Cambodia

9/2/2010 2:01:00 AM

Tibet is like Cambodia ,

Vietnamese are in Cambodia ,

Chinese are in Tibet and Malaysia .

what the fucks .

but Chinese are still paying me money to shut up
my moputh concerning Chinese involvements
in the Khmer Rouge Genocide programmes in Cambodia .

n Aug 31, 4:48 am, the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha
<mahatmanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chaurman Mao,
> can we Indians share Tibet with your Chinese migrants into
> Tibet ?
>
> can we Indians co-own Tibetan territories with your Chinese
> migrants into Tibet ?
>
> Aug 31, 7:55 am, "Chairman Mao , expert fucker of Chinese High
> School Girl 's cunts in China" <monsteroooodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > our Chinese people have a strategy centuries ago to
> > populated all lands south of China Central ,
>
> > China Central was all lands in China Proper Central Plains
> > north of the Chang Jiang River
> > and south of the Yellow river ,
>
> > our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territories which
> > was all lands south of the Chang Jiang river which
> > belonged to 100 tribes of ethnic Yue people who were not
> > Chinese .
>
> > Chinese are now calling Non - Chinese Yue territorie
> > as their South China , which originally was not
> > Chinese territory ,
> > but Yue territory belonging to the Thai - Kadai,
> > the Muongs, the Vietnamese , the Miao , the Malays ,
> > the aborigene natives of Taiwan , etc.......
>
> > our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territory which our Chinese
> > people
> > are now calling as our Chinese South China some 6000 years
> > ago
> > during the Shang Dynasty because of copper mines in Jiang -Xi
> > province ,
> > west of Shanghai city .
>
> > our Chinese migrating strategy is to occupy lands first and
> > talk to negotiate later
> > after our Chinese migrants have taken control of new lands
> > south of China Central ,
> > the Jews in Israel are just copying our Chinese migrating
> > strategy
> > of our Chinese migrants throughout history
> > in SE Asia and in Western China.
>
> > Thus countries like Myanmar , Malaysia , Laos , Tibet, XingJiang ,
> > Inner Mongolia,
> > were the targets of our Chinese migrants .
>
> > 6000 years ago , our Chinese migrants from China Central pushed
> > natives
> > of Yue territories in Jiang-Xi , Wu-Nan ...west ,
> > to Yun Nan , Quang - Xi , Kwei- Zhou ,
> > that was why our Chinese migrants are able to call Yue
> > territories
> > as our South China,
>
> > Today in the 21 st century , our Chinese migrants are SE Asia
> > are
> > calling SE Asia ASEAN as our New South China, because
> > we Chinese have millions of
> > our Chinese people in the Philippines, Singapore , Malaysia ,
> > Thailand ,
> > Myanmar , Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia , Brunei , Cambodia .
>
> > our Chinese aim is to control first all lands in ASEAN and to
> > negotiate later with
> > all natives of ASEAN in order for us Chinese to co-own all
> > ASEAN lands and seas with the Dark Skin REAL native of
> > ASEAN ,
> > our Chinese migrants now have the financial Power
> > in all nations of ASEAN , and with Chinese financial help
> > from Chjinese banks in China , our Chinese migrants shall
> > demand a Chinese co-ownership of ASEAN ,....
> > just
> > like the Japs had planned to do in the last century in SE
> > Asia ,.
> > this time ,
> > it is our turn for our Chinese migrants to occupy lands of
> > ASEAN ,
> > because
> > our Chinese nation will have the military power to threaten
> > natives
> > of ASEAN nations if nations of ASEAN refuse
> > to conform to our Chinese demand for a fair share of the
> > WEALTH
> > of ASEAN for our Chinese people in ASEAN .
>
> > that is why we Chinese are taking the Spratleys ,
> > and our Chinese migrants who are the new Natives of Sabah
> > shall declare Sabah ' s autonomy from the Malay ' s Power
> > in Malayu in West Malaysia.
>
> >http://www.sapp.org.my/beaufort/081222_en_be...
>
> > Aug 29, 7:08 pm, ww <lbt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66205/robert-d-kapla.......
>
> > > The Geography of Chinese Power
> > > How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea?
> > > By Robert D. Kaplan
> > > May/June 2010
>
> > > Thanks to the country’s favorable location on the map, China's
> > > in?uence is expanding on land and at sea, from Central Asia to the
> > > South China Sea and from the Russian Far East to the Indian Ocean.
>
> > > ROBERT D. KAPLAN is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American
> > > Security and a correspondent for The Atlantic. His book Monsoon: The
> > > Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power will be published in the
> > > fall.
>
> > > The English geographer Sir Halford Mackinder ended his famous 1904
> > > article, "The Geographical Pivot of History," with a disturbing
> > > reference to China. After explaining why Eurasia was the geostrategic
> > > fulcrum of world power, he posited that the Chinese, should they
> > > expand their power well beyond their borders, "might constitute the
> > > yellow peril to the world's freedom just because they would add an
> > > oceanic frontage to the resources of the great continent, an advantage
> > > as yet denied to the Russian tenant of the pivot region." Leaving
> > > aside the sentiment's racism, which was common for the era, as well as
> > > the hysterics sparked by the rise of a non-Western power at any time,
> > > Mackinder had a point: whereas Russia, that other Eurasian giant,
> > > basically was, and is still, a land power with an oceanic front
> > > blocked by ice, China, owing to a 9,000-mile temperate coastline with
> > > many good natural harbors, is both a land power and a sea power.
> > > (Mackinder actually feared that China might one day conquer Russia.)
> > > China's virtual reach extends from Central Asia, with all its mineral
> > > and hydrocarbon wealth, to the main shipping lanes of the Pacific
> > > Ocean. Later, in Democratic Ideals and Reality, Mackinder predicted
> > > that along with the United States and the United Kingdom, China would
> > > eventually guide the world by "building for a quarter of humanity a
> > > new civilization, neither quite Eastern nor quite Western."
>
> > > China's blessed geography is so obvious a point that it tends to get
> > > overlooked in discussions of the country's economic dynamism and
> > > national assertiveness. Yet it is essential: it means that China will
> > > stand at the hub of geopolitics even if the country's path toward
> > > global power is not necessarily linear. (China has routinely had GDP
> > > growth rates of more than ten percent annually over the past 30 years,
> > > but they almost certainly cannot last another 30.) China combines an
> > > extreme, Western-style modernity with a "hydraulic civilization" (a
> > > term coined by the historian Karl Wittfogel to describe societies that
> > > exercise centralized control over irrigation) that is reminiscent of
> > > the ancient Orient: thanks to central control, the regime can, for
> > > example, enlist the labor of millions to build major infrastructure.
> > > This makes China relentlessly dynamic in ways that democracies, with
> > > all of their temporizing, cannot be. As China's nominally Communist
> > > rulers -- the scions of some 25 dynasties going back 4,000 years --
> > > are absorbing Western technology and Western practices, they are
> > > integrating them into a disciplined and elaborate cultural system with
> > > a unique experience in, among other things, forming tributary
> > > relationships with other states. "The Chinese," a Singaporean official
> > > told me early this year, "charm you when they want to charm you, and
> > > squeeze you when they want to squeeze you, and they do it quite
> > > systematically."
>
> > > China's internal dynamism creates external ambitions. Empires rarely
> > > come about by design; they grow organically. As states become
> > > stronger, they cultivate new needs and -- this may seem
> > > counterintuitive -- apprehensions that force them to expand in various
> > > forms. Even under the stewardship of some of the most forgettable
> > > presidents -- Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Chester Arthur,
> > > Benjamin Harrison -- the United States' economy grew steadily and
> > > quietly in the late nineteenth century. As the country traded more
> > > with the outside world, it developed complex economic and strategic
> > > interests in far-flung places. Sometimes, as in South America and the
> > > Pacific region, for example, these interests justified military
> > > action. The United States was also able to start focusing outward
> > > during that period because it had consolidated the interior of the
> > > continent; the last major battle of the Indian Wars was fought in
> > > 1890.
>
> > > China today is consolidating its land borders and beginning to turn
> > > outward. China's foreign policy ambitions are as aggressive as those
> > > of the United States a century ago, but for completely different
> > > reasons. China does not take a missionary approach to world affairs,
> > > seeking to spread an ideology or a system of government. Moral
> > > progress in international affairs is an American goal, not a Chinese
> > > one; China's actions abroad are propelled by its need to secure
> > > energy, metals, and strategic minerals in order to support the rising
> > > living standards of its immense population, which amounts to about one-
> > > fifth of the world's total.
>
> > > To accomplish this task, China has built advantageous power
> > > relationships both in contiguous territories and in far-flung locales
> > > rich in the resources it requires to fuel its growth. Because what
> > > drives China abroad has to do with a core national interest --
> > > economic survival -- China can be defined as an über-realist power. It
> > > seeks to develop a sturdy presence throughout the parts of Africa that
> > > are well endowed with oil and minerals and wants to secure port access
> > > throughout
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Wakalukong

9/2/2010 3:36:00 AM

On Sep 2, 10:01 am, Khmer Rouge Hun Sen the Fake Communist now the
Khmer Mafia Boss of Cambodia <hatjman.hun...@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
-----------

Would you want a moron who tells you he's an empress with a black lean
cock to teach you
geography? Ladies and gentlemen, are you now convinced that Khmer
Rouge aka Black
Lean Cock aka Duch Komin is a moron?

Wakalukong

the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha

9/2/2010 11:14:00 AM

Hun Sen , you are a Fake Budhist , and a Fake Communist .

all you want is money ,
just like your fat Cantonese wife Bun Rany Hun Sen ,

your family is a totally fake communist during Democratic
Kampuchea Regime .

now , Mr . Hun SEn , how many Budhist monks did you
kill ?

n Sep 1, 7:01 pm, Khmer Rouge Hun Sen the Fake Communist now the
Khmer Mafia Boss of Cambodia <hatjman.hun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tibet is like Cambodia ,
>
> Vietnamese are in Cambodia ,
>
> Chinese are in Tibet and Malaysia .
>
> what the fucks .
>
> but Chinese are still paying me money to shut up
> my moputh concerning Chinese involvements
> in the Khmer Rouge Genocide programmes in Cambodia .
>
> n Aug 31, 4:48 am, the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha
>
> <mahatmanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Chaurman Mao,
> > can we Indians share Tibet with your Chinese migrants into
> > Tibet ?
>
> > can we Indians co-own Tibetan territories with your Chinese
> > migrants into Tibet ?
>
> > Aug 31, 7:55 am, "Chairman Mao , expert fucker of Chinese High
> > School Girl 's cunts in China" <monsteroooodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > our Chinese people have a strategy centuries ago to
> > > populated all lands south of China Central ,
>
> > > China Central was all lands in China Proper Central Plains
> > > north of the Chang Jiang River
> > > and south of the Yellow river ,
>
> > > our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territories which
> > > was all lands south of the Chang Jiang river which
> > > belonged to 100 tribes of ethnic Yue people who were not
> > > Chinese .
>
> > > Chinese are now calling Non - Chinese Yue territorie
> > > as their South China , which originally was not
> > > Chinese territory ,
> > > but Yue territory belonging to the Thai - Kadai,
> > > the Muongs, the Vietnamese , the Miao , the Malays ,
> > > the aborigene natives of Taiwan , etc.......
>
> > > our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territory which our Chinese
> > > people
> > > are now calling as our Chinese South China some 6000 years
> > > ago
> > > during the Shang Dynasty because of copper mines in Jiang -Xi
> > > province ,
> > > west of Shanghai city .
>
> > > our Chinese migrating strategy is to occupy lands first and
> > > talk to negotiate later
> > > after our Chinese migrants have taken control of new lands
> > > south of China Central ,
> > > the Jews in Israel are just copying our Chinese migrating
> > > strategy
> > > of our Chinese migrants throughout history
> > > in SE Asia and in Western China.
>
> > > Thus countries like Myanmar , Malaysia , Laos , Tibet, XingJiang ,
> > > Inner Mongolia,
> > > were the targets of our Chinese migrants .
>
> > > 6000 years ago , our Chinese migrants from China Central pushed
> > > natives
> > > of Yue territories in Jiang-Xi , Wu-Nan ..west ,
> > > to Yun Nan , Quang - Xi , Kwei- Zhou ,
> > > that was why our Chinese migrants are able to call Yue
> > > territories
> > > as our South China,
>
> > > Today in the 21 st century , our Chinese migrants are SE Asia
> > > are
> > > calling SE Asia ASEAN as our New South China, because
> > > we Chinese have millions of
> > > our Chinese people in the Philippines, Singapore , Malaysia ,
> > > Thailand ,
> > > Myanmar , Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia , Brunei , Cambodia .
>
> > > our Chinese aim is to control first all lands in ASEAN and to
> > > negotiate later with
> > > all natives of ASEAN in order for us Chinese to co-own all
> > > ASEAN lands and seas with the Dark Skin REAL native of
> > > ASEAN ,
> > > our Chinese migrants now have the financial Power
> > > in all nations of ASEAN , and with Chinese financial help
> > > from Chjinese banks in China , our Chinese migrants shall
> > > demand a Chinese co-ownership of ASEAN ,....
> > > just
> > > like the Japs had planned to do in the last century in SE
> > > Asia ,.
> > > this time ,
> > > it is our turn for our Chinese migrants to occupy lands of
> > > ASEAN ,
> > > because
> > > our Chinese nation will have the military power to threaten
> > > natives
> > > of ASEAN nations if nations of ASEAN refuse
> > > to conform to our Chinese demand for a fair share of the
> > > WEALTH
> > > of ASEAN for our Chinese people in ASEAN .
>
> > > that is why we Chinese are taking the Spratleys ,
> > > and our Chinese migrants who are the new Natives of Sabah
> > > shall declare Sabah ' s autonomy from the Malay ' s Power
> > > in Malayu in West Malaysia.
>
> > >http://www.sapp.org.my/beaufort/081222_en_be...
>
> > > Aug 29, 7:08 pm, ww <lbt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66205/robert-d-kapla......
>
> > > > The Geography of Chinese Power
> > > > How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea?
> > > > By Robert D. Kaplan
> > > > May/June 2010
>
> > > > Thanks to the country’s favorable location on the map, China's
> > > > in?uence is expanding on land and at sea, from Central Asia to the
> > > > South China Sea and from the Russian Far East to the Indian Ocean.
>
> > > > ROBERT D. KAPLAN is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American
> > > > Security and a correspondent for The Atlantic. His book Monsoon: The
> > > > Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power will be published in the
> > > > fall.
>
> > > > The English geographer Sir Halford Mackinder ended his famous 1904
> > > > article, "The Geographical Pivot of History," with a disturbing
> > > > reference to China. After explaining why Eurasia was the geostrategic
> > > > fulcrum of world power, he posited that the Chinese, should they
> > > > expand their power well beyond their borders, "might constitute the
> > > > yellow peril to the world's freedom just because they would add an
> > > > oceanic frontage to the resources of the great continent, an advantage
> > > > as yet denied to the Russian tenant of the pivot region." Leaving
> > > > aside the sentiment's racism, which was common for the era, as well as
> > > > the hysterics sparked by the rise of a non-Western power at any time,
> > > > Mackinder had a point: whereas Russia, that other Eurasian giant,
> > > > basically was, and is still, a land power with an oceanic front
> > > > blocked by ice, China, owing to a 9,000-mile temperate coastline with
> > > > many good natural harbors, is both a land power and a sea power.
> > > > (Mackinder actually feared that China might one day conquer Russia.)
> > > > China's virtual reach extends from Central Asia, with all its mineral
> > > > and hydrocarbon wealth, to the main shipping lanes of the Pacific
> > > > Ocean. Later, in Democratic Ideals and Reality, Mackinder predicted
> > > > that along with the United States and the United Kingdom, China would
> > > > eventually guide the world by "building for a quarter of humanity a
> > > > new civilization, neither quite Eastern nor quite Western."
>
> > > > China's blessed geography is so obvious a point that it tends to get
> > > > overlooked in discussions of the country's economic dynamism and
> > > > national assertiveness. Yet it is essential: it means that China will
> > > > stand at the hub of geopolitics even if the country's path toward
> > > > global power is not necessarily linear. (China has routinely had GDP
> > > > growth rates of more than ten percent annually over the past 30 years,
> > > > but they almost certainly cannot last another 30.) China combines an
> > > > extreme, Western-style modernity with a "hydraulic civilization" (a
> > > > term coined by the historian Karl Wittfogel to describe societies that
> > > > exercise centralized control over irrigation) that is reminiscent of
> > > > the ancient Orient: thanks to central control, the regime can, for
> > > > example, enlist the labor of millions to build major infrastructure.
> > > > This makes China relentlessly dynamic in ways that democracies, with
> > > > all of their temporizing, cannot be. As China's nominally Communist
> > > > rulers -- the scions of some 25 dynasties going back 4,000 years --
> > > > are absorbing Western technology and Western practices, they are
> > > > integrating them into a disciplined and elaborate cultural system with
> > > > a unique experience in, among other things, forming tributary
> > > > relationships with other states. "The Chinese," a Singaporean official
> > > > told me early this year, "charm you when they want to charm you, and
> > > > squeeze you when they want to squeeze you, and they do it quite
> > > > systematically."
>
> > > > China's internal dynamism creates external ambitions. Empires rarely
> > > > come about by design; they grow organically. As states become
> > > > stronger, they cultivate new needs and -- this may seem
> > > > counterintuitive -- apprehensions that force them to expand in various
> > > > forms. Even under the stewardship of some of the most forgettable
> > > > presidents -- Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Chester Arthur,
> > > > Benjamin Harrison -- the United States' economy grew steadily and
> > > > quietly in the late nineteenth century. As the country traded more
> > > > with the outside world, it developed complex economic and strategic
> > > > interests in far-flung places. Sometimes, as in South America and the
> > > > Pacific region, for example, these interests justified military
> > > > action. The United States was also able to start focusing outward
> > > > during that period because it had consolidated the interior of the
> > > > continent; the last major battle of the Indian Wars was fought in
> > > > 1890.
>
> > > > China today is consolidating its land borders and beginning to turn
> > > > outward. China's foreign policy ambitions are as aggressive as those
> > > > of the United States a century ago, but for completely different
> > > > reasons. China does not take a missionary approach to world affairs,
> > > > seeking to spread an ideology or a system of government. Moral
> > > > progress in international affairs is an American goal, not a Chinese
> > > > one; China's actions
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Wakalukong

9/2/2010 4:31:00 PM

On Sep 2, 7:14 pm, the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha
<mahatmanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hun Sen , you are a Fake Budhist , and a Fake Communist .
(snip)
------------

Would you want a moron who tells you he's an empress with a black
lean
cock to teach you geography? Ladies and gentlemen, are you now
convinced that Black Lean Cock aka Duch Komin is a moron?

Wakalukong

charlie vietcong

9/3/2010 1:11:00 AM

How many Budhist monks has Excellency Mr . Hun Sen killed ?

who cares ?

as long as Excellency Mr. Hun Sen killed his Khmer people
for
and on behalf of our Vietnamese Vietcongs in Vietnam and in
Campuchea .

n Sep 2, 6:14 pm, the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha
<mahatmanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hun Sen , you are a Fake Budhist , and a Fake Communist .
>
> all you want is money ,
> just like your fat Cantonese wife Bun Rany Hun Sen ,
>
> your family is a totally fake communist during Democratic
> Kampuchea Regime .
>
> now , Mr . Hun SEn , how many Budhist monks did you
> kill ?
>
> n Sep 1, 7:01 pm, Khmer Rouge Hun Sen the Fake Communist now the
> Khmer Mafia Boss of Cambodia <hatjman.hun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tibet is like Cambodia ,
>
> > Vietnamese are in Cambodia ,
>
> > Chinese are in Tibet and Malaysia .
>
> > what the fucks .
>
> > but Chinese are still paying me money to shut up
> > my moputh concerning Chinese involvements
> > in the Khmer Rouge Genocide programmes in Cambodia .
>
> > n Aug 31, 4:48 am, the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha
>
> > <mahatmanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Chaurman Mao,
> > > can we Indians share Tibet with your Chinese migrants into
> > > Tibet ?
>
> > > can we Indians co-own Tibetan territories with your Chinese
> > > migrants into Tibet ?
>
> > > Aug 31, 7:55 am, "Chairman Mao , expert fucker of Chinese High
> > > School Girl 's cunts in China" <monsteroooodk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > our Chinese people have a strategy centuries ago to
> > > > populated all lands south of China Central ,
>
> > > > China Central was all lands in China Proper Central Plains
> > > > north of the Chang Jiang River
> > > > and south of the Yellow river ,
>
> > > > our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territories which
> > > > was all lands south of the Chang Jiang river which
> > > > belonged to 100 tribes of ethnic Yue people who were not
> > > > Chinese .
>
> > > > Chinese are now calling Non - Chinese Yue territorie
> > > > as their South China , which originally was not
> > > > Chinese territory ,
> > > > but Yue territory belonging to the Thai - Kadai,
> > > > the Muongs, the Vietnamese , the Miao , the Malays ,
> > > > the aborigene natives of Taiwan , etc......
>
> > > > our Chinese migrants invaded Yue territory which our Chinese
> > > > people
> > > > are now calling as our Chinese South China some 6000 years
> > > > ago
> > > > during the Shang Dynasty because of copper mines in Jiang -Xi
> > > > province ,
> > > > west of Shanghai city .
>
> > > > our Chinese migrating strategy is to occupy lands first and
> > > > talk to negotiate later
> > > > after our Chinese migrants have taken control of new lands
> > > > south of China Central ,
> > > > the Jews in Israel are just copying our Chinese migrating
> > > > strategy
> > > > of our Chinese migrants throughout history
> > > > in SE Asia and in Western China.
>
> > > > Thus countries like Myanmar , Malaysia , Laos , Tibet, XingJiang ,
> > > > Inner Mongolia,
> > > > were the targets of our Chinese migrants .
>
> > > > 6000 years ago , our Chinese migrants from China Central pushed
> > > > natives
> > > > of Yue territories in Jiang-Xi , Wu-Nan ..west ,
> > > > to Yun Nan , Quang - Xi , Kwei- Zhou ,
> > > > that was why our Chinese migrants are able to call Yue
> > > > territories
> > > > as our South China,
>
> > > > Today in the 21 st century , our Chinese migrants are SE Asia
> > > > are
> > > > calling SE Asia ASEAN as our New South China, because
> > > > we Chinese have millions of
> > > > our Chinese people in the Philippines, Singapore , Malaysia ,
> > > > Thailand ,
> > > > Myanmar , Laos, Vietnam, Indonesia , Brunei , Cambodia .
>
> > > > our Chinese aim is to control first all lands in ASEAN and to
> > > > negotiate later with
> > > > all natives of ASEAN in order for us Chinese to co-own all
> > > > ASEAN lands and seas with the Dark Skin REAL native of
> > > > ASEAN ,
> > > > our Chinese migrants now have the financial Power
> > > > in all nations of ASEAN , and with Chinese financial help
> > > > from Chjinese banks in China , our Chinese migrants shall
> > > > demand a Chinese co-ownership of ASEAN ,....
> > > > just
> > > > like the Japs had planned to do in the last century in SE
> > > > Asia ,.
> > > > this time ,
> > > > it is our turn for our Chinese migrants to occupy lands of
> > > > ASEAN ,
> > > > because
> > > > our Chinese nation will have the military power to threaten
> > > > natives
> > > > of ASEAN nations if nations of ASEAN refuse
> > > > to conform to our Chinese demand for a fair share of the
> > > > WEALTH
> > > > of ASEAN for our Chinese people in ASEAN .
>
> > > > that is why we Chinese are taking the Spratleys ,
> > > > and our Chinese migrants who are the new Natives of Sabah
> > > > shall declare Sabah ' s autonomy from the Malay ' s Power
> > > > in Malayu in West Malaysia.
>
> > > >http://www.sapp.org.my/beaufort/081222_en_be...
>
> > > > Aug 29, 7:08 pm, ww <lbt...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > >http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66205/robert-d-kapla......
>
> > > > > The Geography of Chinese Power
> > > > > How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea?
> > > > > By Robert D. Kaplan
> > > > > May/June 2010
>
> > > > > Thanks to the country’s favorable location on the map, China's
> > > > > in?uence is expanding on land and at sea, from Central Asia to the
> > > > > South China Sea and from the Russian Far East to the Indian Ocean.
>
> > > > > ROBERT D. KAPLAN is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American
> > > > > Security and a correspondent for The Atlantic. His book Monsoon: The
> > > > > Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power will be published in the
> > > > > fall.
>
> > > > > The English geographer Sir Halford Mackinder ended his famous 1904
> > > > > article, "The Geographical Pivot of History," with a disturbing
> > > > > reference to China. After explaining why Eurasia was the geostrategic
> > > > > fulcrum of world power, he posited that the Chinese, should they
> > > > > expand their power well beyond their borders, "might constitute the
> > > > > yellow peril to the world's freedom just because they would add an
> > > > > oceanic frontage to the resources of the great continent, an advantage
> > > > > as yet denied to the Russian tenant of the pivot region." Leaving
> > > > > aside the sentiment's racism, which was common for the era, as well as
> > > > > the hysterics sparked by the rise of a non-Western power at any time,
> > > > > Mackinder had a point: whereas Russia, that other Eurasian giant,
> > > > > basically was, and is still, a land power with an oceanic front
> > > > > blocked by ice, China, owing to a 9,000-mile temperate coastline with
> > > > > many good natural harbors, is both a land power and a sea power.
> > > > > (Mackinder actually feared that China might one day conquer Russia.)
> > > > > China's virtual reach extends from Central Asia, with all its mineral
> > > > > and hydrocarbon wealth, to the main shipping lanes of the Pacific
> > > > > Ocean. Later, in Democratic Ideals and Reality, Mackinder predicted
> > > > > that along with the United States and the United Kingdom, China would
> > > > > eventually guide the world by "building for a quarter of humanity a
> > > > > new civilization, neither quite Eastern nor quite Western."
>
> > > > > China's blessed geography is so obvious a point that it tends to get
> > > > > overlooked in discussions of the country's economic dynamism and
> > > > > national assertiveness. Yet it is essential: it means that China will
> > > > > stand at the hub of geopolitics even if the country's path toward
> > > > > global power is not necessarily linear. (China has routinely had GDP
> > > > > growth rates of more than ten percent annually over the past 30 years,
> > > > > but they almost certainly cannot last another 30.) China combines an
> > > > > extreme, Western-style modernity with a "hydraulic civilization" (a
> > > > > term coined by the historian Karl Wittfogel to describe societies that
> > > > > exercise centralized control over irrigation) that is reminiscent of
> > > > > the ancient Orient: thanks to central control, the regime can, for
> > > > > example, enlist the labor of millions to build major infrastructure.
> > > > > This makes China relentlessly dynamic in ways that democracies, with
> > > > > all of their temporizing, cannot be. As China's nominally Communist
> > > > > rulers -- the scions of some 25 dynasties going back 4,000 years --
> > > > > are absorbing Western technology and Western practices, they are
> > > > > integrating them into a disciplined and elaborate cultural system with
> > > > > a unique experience in, among other things, forming tributary
> > > > > relationships with other states. "The Chinese," a Singaporean official
> > > > > told me early this year, "charm you when they want to charm you, and
> > > > > squeeze you when they want to squeeze you, and they do it quite
> > > > > systematically."
>
> > > > > China's internal dynamism creates external ambitions. Empires rarely
> > > > > come about by design; they grow organically. As states become
> > > > > stronger, they cultivate new needs and -- this may seem
> > > > > counterintuitive -- apprehensions that force them to expand in various
> > > > > forms. Even under the stewardship of some of the most forgettable
> > > > > presidents -- Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Chester Arthur,
> > > > > Benjamin Harrison -- the United States' economy grew steadily and
> > > > > quietly in the late nineteenth century. As the country traded more
> > > > > with the outside world, it developed complex economic and strategic
> > > > > interests in far-flung
>
> ...
>
> read more »

comp.lang.ruby

Testing code branching coverage

Carl Youngblood

soc.culture.china

his Excellency Itoh , the Japanese Advisor to the Manchu Imperial Government

Wakalukong

the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha

Wakalukong

Khmer Rouge Hun Sen the Fake Communist now the Khmer Mafia Boss of Cambodia

Wakalukong

the Black LEARN GA kock of the Fucking Boudha

Wakalukong

charlie vietcong

x Login to ForumsZone