Zulu
1/29/2009 4:21:00 PM
Roger escribi?:
> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Zulu wrote
> in message <4980a245$1@news.x-privat.org>:
>
>> Roger escribi?:
>
>>>>> If course, Pressac goes on to say
>>>>>
>>>>> <quote>
>>>>>
>>>>> The discrepancy between the numbers of this drawing and its date is an
>>>>> indication that the members of the Bauleitung, who had completed the
>>>>> study for the new Krematorium at the main camp only on 28th January
>>>>> 1942, with a complete series of drawings (932, 933, 934, 935, 936,
>>>>> 937, 938), had been caught unprepared by the decision made on 27th
>>>>> February 1942 to transfer the building to Birkenau where the nature of
>>>>> the land was different. Pushed for time, they used the drawings from
>>>>> their earlier study, making the absolute minimum of changes and not
>>>>> even bothering to change the dates and some of the numbers on the
>>>>> original identification blocks.
>>>>>
>>>>> </quote>
>>>>>
>>>>> IOW, the drawing does not accurately reflect the room as it was built.
>>>>>
>>>>> Funny that you skipped that part of the page...
>
>>>> And, Does it change something in the ventilation system?
>
>>> Then ventilation system as described by witnesses in a position to
>>> know was sufficient to the task.
>
>> LOL, should eyewitnesses proved to be LIARS be considered more credible than
>> documents and material proofs?
>
> Which eyewitnesses are you referring to?
Vrba first, than all so-called sonderkommandos who assumed that the operations had
been performed under "SECRECY".
MOre the ones of whom the testimony were posted here by McVay and I debunked like
Pery Broad or MIKLOS NYISZLI...
If you have more, so put it.
>> That is all about it for that "gas chambers" HOAX, only tales sustains it.
>
> No, *complete* documents do, as will.
WOW, which ones?
>> The Leichenkeller 1 at Krema II is almost INTACT to be analyzed, idiot.
>> Why is not that elementary job already made by those so called "serious scholars"?
>
> Why do you lie that it has not been?
About the points I mentioned?
Please give here the results about
1- the actual ventilation system
2- the traces on the floor of the embedding of the alleged "wire mesh introduction
columns". (Van Pelt forgot it on his job about "holes", really amazing)
3- the size of the entrance door. Is it really that ludicrous "1 meter width" door
assumed by Pressac?