ptkwt
10/23/2003 3:48:00 AM
In article <3F9705AD.7070908@hypermetrics.com>,
Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> wrote:
>Andrew Walrond wrote:
>> On Wednesday 22 Oct 2003 10:57 pm, Hal Fulton wrote:
>
>>>I don't wish to detract from Rubyx or the efforts of
>>>Andrew W and others.
>>>
>>>But it was Lunar, not Rubyx, that I was talking about.
>>
>> Sorry! Didn't mean to hijack the thread :(
>
>No apology needed, you didn't hijack anything.
>
>I remembered Rubyx and sent you email this last night...
>think it bounced. Maybe I typed the addr wrong.
>
>And Lunar has never been mentioned until recently as far
>as I am aware.
>
>In any event, you can contribute to Lunar if you wish,
>and I'd encourage it. I'm not certain Lunar and Rubyx are
>competing things just because they both use Ruby.
>
>But I'm throwing my lot in with Lunar. I like it, and I
>intend to apply a good deal of my energy to it.
>
Well, if nothing else maybe Lunar could use Rubyx's Ruby-based init
system (which apparently is already working)... It's pretty much a
standalone subsystem so the more users the better. And it could save a
bit of effort.
Phil