[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.mobile

Pocket IE cant get Focus?

CB_Millenium

6/8/2007 9:55:00 AM

I have a problem with an ASP.Net website that sets focus perfectly in IE,
but not on a windows mobile device.

As the page loads it needs to set focus to the txtBarcode textbox, so that
the cursor is in the textbox.

This seems to be a problem with Pocket IE, has anyone experienced this and
been able to work around it?

Thanx in advance...cb
13 Answers

New World Disorder

3/19/2010 8:16:00 PM

0


"Not Sure" <fred1321123@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c4ee2e45-7806-435a-b28a-e82ba4b0977a@l24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 19, 12:41 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:

It's a good thing the voices in your head are so loud. Otherwise you'd hear
us all laughing. At you.


New World Disorder

3/19/2010 8:17:00 PM

0


"snakehawk" <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote in message
news:9a976ffe-c64a-4431-b383-2af8534cb1c5@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 19, 3:50 pm, Not Sure <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 12:41 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 3:27 pm, "just say no to socialism!"
>
> > <bettymar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > please remember to DIGGhttp://digg.c...
>
> > Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
> > Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
> > received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
> > such memo was ever sent.
>
> > The memo addresses one of the sham issues that the Republicans have
> > trumped up to try to defeat the bill for their Insurance industry
> > paymasters. It would be like a finding phony memo advising the
> > democrats to hide provisions about death panels or free abortions.
>
> > It's just another Republican dirty trick. We should all keep in mind
> > the amount of money the insurance industry could lose if the
> > Democratic healthcare bill passes--we're talking trillions of
> > dollars.
>
> How exactly does a bill which requires everyone to buy insurance but
> provides no public mechanism to do so, mean insurance companies will
> lose money? Please try making sense next time, dipshit.
>
> There is no limit to what the insurance industry will do to
>
>
>
> > crush the bill, and there is no limit to what the Republican will do
> > to please their generous insurance industry campaign donors.- Hide
> > quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
healthcare. And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
premiums received.

The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
secret from the general public. The amount of money the insurance
companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.

Why do you think the Republicans are fighting so hard to kill a bill
that attempts to expand healthcare coverage to millions of otherwise
uninsured voters and to make healthcare available and affordable to
small businesses? Do you think Republicans, who casually spend
trillions for wars, new weapons, and big bank bailouts, have suddenly
become fiscally responsible?
=================

The creepiest part of all this is that a lot of these wingnut politicians
actually seem to believe much of the lies and conspiracy theories they're
spouting. How someone like that gets into congress, or any other job more
mentally strenuous than mowing lawns, is baffling.


Jericho

3/19/2010 8:29:00 PM

0

"New World Disorder" <nwd@chugga.net> wrote in message
news:ho0m3i$f4e$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> "snakehawk" <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote in message
> news:9a976ffe-c64a-4431-b383-2af8534cb1c5@19g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 19, 3:50 pm, Not Sure <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 12:41 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mar 19, 3:27 pm, "just say no to socialism!"
>>
>> > <bettymar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > please remember to DIGGhttp://digg.c...
>>
>> > Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>> > Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>> > received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>> > such memo was ever sent.
>>
>> > The memo addresses one of the sham issues that the Republicans have
>> > trumped up to try to defeat the bill for their Insurance industry
>> > paymasters. It would be like a finding phony memo advising the
>> > democrats to hide provisions about death panels or free abortions.
>>
>> > It's just another Republican dirty trick. We should all keep in mind
>> > the amount of money the insurance industry could lose if the
>> > Democratic healthcare bill passes--we're talking trillions of
>> > dollars.
>>
>> How exactly does a bill which requires everyone to buy insurance but
>> provides no public mechanism to do so, mean insurance companies will
>> lose money? Please try making sense next time, dipshit.
>>
>> There is no limit to what the insurance industry will do to
>>
>> > crush the bill, and there is no limit to what the Republican will do
>> > to please their generous insurance industry campaign donors.- Hide
>> > quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
> they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
> healthcare. And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
> for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
> premiums received.
>
> The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
> secret from the general public. The amount of money the insurance
> companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.
>
> Why do you think the Republicans are fighting so hard to kill a bill
> that attempts to expand healthcare coverage to millions of otherwise
> uninsured voters and to make healthcare available and affordable to
> small businesses? Do you think Republicans, who casually spend
> trillions for wars, new weapons, and big bank bailouts, have suddenly
> become fiscally responsible?
> =================
>
> The creepiest part of all this is that a lot of these wingnut politicians
> actually seem to believe much of the lies and conspiracy theories they're
> spouting. How someone like that gets into congress, or any other job more
> mentally strenuous than mowing lawns, is baffling.

These politicians know all to well that they
are foisting a fraud on the American public.


Gnome

3/20/2010 4:24:00 AM

0

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT), snakehawk
<snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote:

>Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>such memo was ever sent.

It was a proven hoax---circulated by (gee, whoda thunk) Drudge, picked
up by the NRRC and circulated to faux.

Jericho

3/20/2010 1:48:00 PM

0

<Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
news:ncj8q5hq5frgiqor5v8qh1rj8cvoklun31@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT), snakehawk
> <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
>>Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>>Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>>received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>>such memo was ever sent.
>
> It was a proven hoax

Who was the source?

>---circulated by (gee, whoda thunk) Drudge, picked
> up by the NRRC and circulated to faux.


Beam Me Up Scotty

3/20/2010 2:48:00 PM

0


> <Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
> news:ncj8q5hq5frgiqor5v8qh1rj8cvoklun31@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT), snakehawk
>> <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>>> Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>>> received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>>> such memo was ever sent.
>>
>> It was a proven hoax

The second MEMO said to call the first Memo a hoax....

Jericho

3/20/2010 3:18:00 PM

0

<Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
news:nqs9q5lnqki5s1h3ogmmr11uk9k5j08tmc@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:47:59 -0500, "Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:
>
>><Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
>>news:ncj8q5hq5frgiqor5v8qh1rj8cvoklun31@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT), snakehawk
>>> <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>>>>Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>>>>received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>>>>such memo was ever sent.
>>>
>>> It was a proven hoax
>>
>>Who was the source?
>>
>>>---circulated by (gee, whoda thunk) Drudge, picked
>>> up by the NRRC and circulated to faux.
>
> Last I heard--Drudge published an unsupported, unresearched "paper"
> with 70's type formatting--IOW made to look official. It then
> appeared on Politico (I believe) then made it's way to the Republican
> committee then to faux snooze
>
> No one authenticated it
>
> Drudge is famous for that kind of "work"

Sounds like it's not a proven hoax yet.


Gnome

3/20/2010 4:12:00 PM

0

On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:47:59 -0500, "Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:

><Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
>news:ncj8q5hq5frgiqor5v8qh1rj8cvoklun31@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT), snakehawk
>> <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>>>Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>>>received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>>>such memo was ever sent.
>>
>> It was a proven hoax
>
>Who was the source?
>
>>---circulated by (gee, whoda thunk) Drudge, picked
>> up by the NRRC and circulated to faux.

Last I heard--Drudge published an unsupported, unresearched "paper"
with 70's type formatting--IOW made to look official. It then
appeared on Politico (I believe) then made it's way to the Republican
committee then to faux snooze

No one authenticated it

Drudge is famous for that kind of "work"

Gnome

3/20/2010 4:13:00 PM

0

On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:48:20 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Then-Fire-A-Full-Spred-Of-Photon-Torpedoes@blackhole.NebulaX.com>
wrote:

>
>> <Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
>> news:ncj8q5hq5frgiqor5v8qh1rj8cvoklun31@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT), snakehawk
>>> <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>>>> Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>>>> received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>>>> such memo was ever sent.
>>>
>>> It was a proven hoax
>
>The second MEMO said to call the first Memo a hoax....

All other information says that there is no evidence any memo was
legitimate.

Gnome

3/20/2010 7:12:00 PM

0

On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:17:37 -0500, "Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:

><Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
>news:nqs9q5lnqki5s1h3ogmmr11uk9k5j08tmc@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:47:59 -0500, "Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:
>>
>>><Gnome@cold.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ncj8q5hq5frgiqor5v8qh1rj8cvoklun31@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:41:28 -0700 (PDT), snakehawk
>>>> <snakehawk@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>>>>>Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>>>>>received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>>>>>such memo was ever sent.
>>>>
>>>> It was a proven hoax
>>>
>>>Who was the source?
>>>
>>>>---circulated by (gee, whoda thunk) Drudge, picked
>>>> up by the NRRC and circulated to faux.
>>
>> Last I heard--Drudge published an unsupported, unresearched "paper"
>> with 70's type formatting--IOW made to look official. It then
>> appeared on Politico (I believe) then made it's way to the Republican
>> committee then to faux snooze
>>
>> No one authenticated it
>>
>> Drudge is famous for that kind of "work"
>
>Sounds like it's not a proven hoax yet.
>

The ONLY place it's not a hoax is at Faux