[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

CB_Millenium

6/8/2007 9:51:00 AM

I have a problem with an ASP.Net website that sets focus perfectly in IE,
but not on a windows mobile device.

As the page loads it needs to set focus to the txtBarcode textbox, so that
the cursor is in the textbox.

This seems to be a problem with Pocket IE, has anyone experienced this and
been able to work around it?

Thanx in advance...cb


11 Answers

snakehawk

3/19/2010 8:01:00 PM

0

On Mar 19, 3:50 pm, Not Sure <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 12:41 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 3:27 pm, "just say no to socialism!"
>
> > <bettymar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > please remember to DIGGhttp://digg.c...
>
> > Hmm.  The article says that the memo most probably came from a
> > Republican source.  The Democrats all confirmed that they never
> > received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
> > such memo was ever sent.
>
> > The memo addresses one of the sham issues that the Republicans have
> > trumped up to try to defeat the bill for their Insurance industry
> > paymasters.  It would be like a finding phony memo advising the
> > democrats to hide provisions about death panels or free abortions.
>
> > It's just another Republican dirty trick.  We should all keep in mind
> > the amount of money the insurance industry could lose if the
> > Democratic healthcare bill passes--we're talking trillions of
> > dollars.
>
> How exactly does a bill which requires everyone to buy insurance but
> provides no public mechanism to do so, mean insurance companies will
> lose money? Please try making sense next time, dipshit.
>
>   There is no limit to what the insurance industry will do to
>
>
>
> > crush the bill, and there is no limit to what the Republican will do
> > to please their generous insurance industry campaign donors.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
healthcare. And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
premiums received.

The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
secret from the general public. The amount of money the insurance
companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.

Why do you think the Republicans are fighting so hard to kill a bill
that attempts to expand healthcare coverage to millions of otherwise
uninsured voters and to make healthcare available and affordable to
small businesses? Do you think Republicans, who casually spend
trillions for wars, new weapons, and big bank bailouts, have suddenly
become fiscally responsible?

The PHANTOM

3/19/2010 8:14:00 PM

0

On Mar 19, 2:50 pm, Not Sure <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 12:41 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 3:27 pm, "just say no to socialism!"
>
> > <bettymar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > please remember to DIGGhttp://digg.c...
>
> > Hmm.  The article says that the memo most probably came from a
> > Republican source.  The Democrats all confirmed that they never
> > received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
> > such memo was ever sent.
>
> > The memo addresses one of the sham issues that the Republicans have
> > trumped up to try to defeat the bill for their Insurance industry
> > paymasters.  It would be like a finding phony memo advising the
> > democrats to hide provisions about death panels or free abortions.
>
> > It's just another Republican dirty trick.  We should all keep in mind
> > the amount of money the insurance industry could lose if the
> > Democratic healthcare bill passes--we're talking trillions of
> > dollars.
>
> How exactly does a bill which requires everyone to buy insurance but
> provides no public mechanism to do so, mean insurance companies will
> lose money? Please try making sense next time, dipshit.
>
>   There is no limit to what the insurance industry will do to
>
>
>
> > crush the bill, and there is no limit to what the Republican will do
> > to please their generous insurance industry campaign donors.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Because there'll be 30 million+ more mexxkins added to the rolls and
can't be denied insurance for pre-existing conditions. Besides,Obongo
will cut premiums by 3,000 percent. In a few years the only
"insurance" provider will be gubmint. Which is precicely what the
progressives want.

The PHANTOM

3/19/2010 8:17:00 PM

0

On Mar 19, 3:01 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 3:50 pm, Not Sure <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 12:41 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 19, 3:27 pm, "just say no to socialism!"
>
> > > <bettymar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > please remember to DIGGhttp://digg.c...
>
> > > Hmm.  The article says that the memo most probably came from a
> > > Republican source.  The Democrats all confirmed that they never
> > > received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
> > > such memo was ever sent.
>
> > > The memo addresses one of the sham issues that the Republicans have
> > > trumped up to try to defeat the bill for their Insurance industry
> > > paymasters.  It would be like a finding phony memo advising the
> > > democrats to hide provisions about death panels or free abortions.
>
> > > It's just another Republican dirty trick.  We should all keep in mind
> > > the amount of money the insurance industry could lose if the
> > > Democratic healthcare bill passes--we're talking trillions of
> > > dollars.
>
> > How exactly does a bill which requires everyone to buy insurance but
> > provides no public mechanism to do so, mean insurance companies will
> > lose money? Please try making sense next time, dipshit.
>
> >   There is no limit to what the insurance industry will do to
>
> > > crush the bill, and there is no limit to what the Republican will do
> > > to please their generous insurance industry campaign donors.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
> they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
> healthcare.  And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
> for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
> premiums received.
>
> The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
> secret from the general public.  The amount of money the insurance
> companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.
>
> Why do you think the Republicans are fighting so hard to kill a bill
> that attempts to expand healthcare coverage to millions of otherwise
> uninsured voters and to make healthcare available and affordable to
> small businesses?  Do you think Republicans, who casually spend
> trillions for wars, new weapons, and big bank bailouts, have suddenly
> become fiscally responsible?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No. But nobody ever expected progressives to be fiscally responsible
so this huge gubmint takeover of 1/6th of the economy which will cost
$2 TRILLION or more comes as no suprise.

David Hartung

3/19/2010 9:57:00 PM

0

snakehawk wrote:
> On Mar 19, 3:50 pm, Not Sure <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 12:41 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 19, 3:27 pm, "just say no to socialism!"
>>> <bettymar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> please remember to DIGGhttp://digg.c...
>>> Hmm. The article says that the memo most probably came from a
>>> Republican source. The Democrats all confirmed that they never
>>> received such a memo, and the Democratic leadership confirmed that no
>>> such memo was ever sent.
>>> The memo addresses one of the sham issues that the Republicans have
>>> trumped up to try to defeat the bill for their Insurance industry
>>> paymasters. It would be like a finding phony memo advising the
>>> democrats to hide provisions about death panels or free abortions.
>>> It's just another Republican dirty trick. We should all keep in mind
>>> the amount of money the insurance industry could lose if the
>>> Democratic healthcare bill passes--we're talking trillions of
>>> dollars.
>> How exactly does a bill which requires everyone to buy insurance but
>> provides no public mechanism to do so, mean insurance companies will
>> lose money? Please try making sense next time, dipshit.
>>
>> There is no limit to what the insurance industry will do to
>>
>>
>>
>>> crush the bill, and there is no limit to what the Republican will do
>>> to please their generous insurance industry campaign donors.- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
> they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
> healthcare. And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
> for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
> premiums received.

And you don't see this as unconstitutional?

David Hartung

3/19/2010 9:58:00 PM

0

snakehawk wrote:

> The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
> secret from the general public. The amount of money the insurance
> companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.

That is because the only people who have any right to such information
are insurance company shareholders.

snakehawk

3/19/2010 10:18:00 PM

0

On Mar 19, 4:16 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 3:01 pm,snakehawk<snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
> > The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
> > they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
> > healthcare.  And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
> > for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
> > premiums received.
>
> > The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
> > secret from the general public.  The amount of money the insurance
> > companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.
>
> > Why do you think the Republicans are fighting so hard to kill a bill
> > that attempts to expand healthcare coverage to millions of otherwise
> > uninsured voters and to make healthcare available and affordable to
> > small businesses?  Do you think Republicans, who casually spend
> > trillions for wars, new weapons, and big bank bailouts, have suddenly
> > become fiscally responsible?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> No. But nobody ever expected progressives to be fiscally responsible
> so this huge gubmint takeover of 1/6th of the economy which will cost
> $2 TRILLION or more comes as no suprise.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Think about you are writing. One sixth, a full 17 percent, of the
incredibly massive US economy is being lorded over and virtually
controlled by a few profit-motivated, jet-setting insurance
executives. That's tens of trillions of dollars flowing through the
banks accounts of a few companies every year, companies whose major
objective is to keep as much of that money for themselves as they
can.

To meet their objective, the companies must charge the highest premium
they can, shut out as many risky policyholders as they can, deny
coverage to as many claimants as they can, hide as many expenses as
they can, and pay as little taxes as they can. Would you expect
anything else from good business management?

To carry out their business plan, the insurance companies must hire
the best and most expensive public relations firms whose job is to
contact every media outlet and pass out carefully written pamphlets
and prepared videos lavishly praising the wonderful work of the
insurance industry. Those public relations experts are the principal
reason few people are aware of the enormous sums being squandered by
the Insurance industry every year.

Every year, the insurance companies spend billions in advertising,
more millions in professional fees to accountants, actuaries,
consultants, brokers, and a veritable army of lawyers. And the
executives hire only the best--and all of them are friends and
supporters.

In addition, the insurance executives pay millions of dollars to
lobbying firms with special connections to Congress, fast-talking,
well-dressed barkers who haunt the offices of elected officials
offering all-expense-paid jaunts to exotic places, lavish dinners,
financial tips, not to mention expensive gifts, beautiful hookers, and
cash under the table. All paid for with money collected from
policyholders who think they are covered against loss for catastrophic
medical emergencies.

Now, no one wants to deprive you of your right to cast your hard-
earned money into the insurance industry pig trough. It's your right,
your privilege. In fact, if there were some way to exclude you people
from any government regulated plan, I for one would vote for it.

But there are millions of Americans, including tens of millions of
children, who are being shut out of the insurance industry's greedy
drunken orgy simply because it's too expensive to pay for both the
insurance and the insurance executive's spending sprees. That's the
problem healthcare insurance reform is addressing.

The basic plan is to split the industry into two parts: one that
insures and pays benefits while collecting reasonable premiums, and
another one that all the suckers can still shovel their money into
while they dream of rubbing shoulders with all those rich executives
and shouting Socialsim, Communism, or even Nazism.

Gnome

3/20/2010 4:27:00 AM

0

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:56:59 -0500, David Hartung
<d_hartung@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
>> they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
>> healthcare. And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
>> for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
>> premiums received.
>
>And you don't see this as unconstitutional?

What IS it with you hartung

Every goddamn thing is "unconstitutional" to you

It is a SOCIAL issue---not one of strict free market enterprise where
"work" or a "product" is in play

This affects ALL Americans

Gnome

3/20/2010 4:28:00 AM

0

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:57:54 -0500, David Hartung
<d_hartung@hotmail.com> wrote:

>snakehawk wrote:
>
>> The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
>> secret from the general public. The amount of money the insurance
>> companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.
>
>That is because the only people who have any right to such information
>are insurance company shareholders.

They do not

Only by investigation did we find out that a program had been set up
to find "undesirable" policy holders and jack their prices up (to get
rid of them)

The PHANTOM

3/20/2010 2:43:00 PM

0

On Mar 19, 5:17 pm, snakehawk <snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 4:16 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 3:01 pm,snakehawk<snakeh...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
> > > The bill requires the insurance industry to report exactly how much
> > > they receive in premiums and exactly how much they pay out for actual
> > > healthcare.  And the bill limits the the amount the insurance can keep
> > > for all administrative costs and profits to 15 percent of total
> > > premiums received.
>
> > > The insurance industry has fought for decades to keep those numbers
> > > secret from the general public.  The amount of money the insurance
> > > companies have been skimming off every year is staggering.
>
> > > Why do you think the Republicans are fighting so hard to kill a bill
> > > that attempts to expand healthcare coverage to millions of otherwise
> > > uninsured voters and to make healthcare available and affordable to
> > > small businesses?  Do you think Republicans, who casually spend
> > > trillions for wars, new weapons, and big bank bailouts, have suddenly
> > > become fiscally responsible?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > No. But nobody ever expected progressives to be fiscally responsible
> > so this huge gubmint takeover of 1/6th of the economy which will cost
> > $2 TRILLION or more comes as no suprise.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Think about you are writing.  One sixth,  a full 17 percent, of the
> incredibly massive US economy is being lorded over and virtually
> controlled by a few profit-motivated, jet-setting insurance
> executives.  That's tens of trillions of dollars flowing through the
> banks accounts of a few companies every year, companies whose major
> objective is to keep as much of that money for themselves as they
> can.
>
> To meet their objective, the companies must charge the highest premium
> they can, shut out as many risky policyholders as they can, deny
> coverage to as many claimants as they can, hide as many expenses as
> they can, and pay as little taxes as they can. Would you expect
> anything else from good business management?
>
> To carry out their business plan, the insurance companies must hire
> the best and most expensive public relations firms whose job is to
> contact every media outlet and pass out carefully written pamphlets
> and prepared videos lavishly praising the wonderful work of the
> insurance industry. Those public relations experts are the principal
> reason few people are aware of the enormous sums being squandered by
> the Insurance industry every year.
>
> Every year, the insurance companies spend billions in advertising,
> more millions in professional fees to accountants, actuaries,
> consultants, brokers, and a veritable army of lawyers.  And the
> executives hire only the best--and all of them are friends and
> supporters.
>
> In addition, the insurance executives pay millions of dollars to
> lobbying firms with special connections to Congress, fast-talking,
> well-dressed barkers who haunt the offices of elected officials
> offering all-expense-paid jaunts to exotic places, lavish dinners,
> financial tips, not to mention expensive gifts, beautiful hookers, and
> cash under the table. All paid for with money collected from
> policyholders who think they are covered against loss for catastrophic
> medical emergencies.
>
> Now, no one wants to deprive you of your right to cast your hard-
> earned money into the insurance industry pig trough.  It's your right,
> your privilege.  In fact, if there were some way to exclude you people
> from any government regulated plan, I for one would vote for it.
>
> But there are millions of Americans, including tens of millions of
> children, who are being shut out of the insurance industry's greedy
> drunken orgy simply because it's too expensive to pay for both the
> insurance and the insurance executive's spending sprees.  That's the
> problem healthcare insurance reform is addressing.
>
> The basic plan is to split the industry into two parts: one that
> insures and pays benefits while collecting reasonable premiums, and
> another one that all the suckers can still shovel their money into
> while they dream of rubbing shoulders with all those rich executives
> and shouting Socialsim, Communism, or even Nazism.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

So,the bottom line is you support this fucking abortion of a bill
simply because it'll put privately owned,for profit insurance
companies out of business. If that's the case then you should be
ecstatic knowing the massive tax increases and over-regulation will
cause even more "privately owned/for profit" businesses to shut down
or move offshore.

The PHANTOM

3/21/2010 3:59:00 PM

0

On Mar 20, 11:20 am, Gn...@cold.com wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:42:31 -0700 (PDT), The PHANTOM
>
> <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >So,the bottom line is you support this fucking abortion of a bill
> >simply because it'll put privately owned,for profit insurance
> >companies out of business.
>
> Don't want them out of business, you dipshit
>
> Want them regulated and directed to insure any/all Americans in their
> pool without denial of participation and prior illness.
>
> If you're so fucking weepy about "profit"----then instead of paying a
> CEO $100 million in salary, bonus and stock option---give some of that
> money to the shareholders.
>
> >If that's the case then you should be
> >ecstatic knowing the massive tax increases and over-regulation will
> >cause even more "privately owned/for profit" businesses to shut down
> >or move offshore.
>
> sounds more convincing when some idiot republican is reading that
> mantra from the talking points he got this morning.  You regurgitating
> is glaring evidence you wouldn't have a clue one way or other what the
> bill does.
>
> Not from your own intellectual ability, anyway.

IOW you want them out of business.