Anonymous@nowhere.com
8/25/2011 11:26:00 AM
Did you want to make some sort of comment or did you just hit "send" too
quickly?
On 8/24/2011 9:35 PM, don Gabacho wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:23:35 PM UTC-4, anonymous wrote:
>> On 8/24/2011 8:34 PM, don Gabacho wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:01:55 PM UTC-4, anonymous wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/2011 5:43 PM, don Gabacho wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 3:47:01 PM UTC-4, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some words emigrate legally, others not...
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you see what I mean "anonymous"?
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> You do not see his saying that even "words" can be "legal or not"?
>>
>> I see it, but I don't see any significance either way, nor what point
>> you are trying to make. It was a meaningless statement.
>>
>>>
>>>>> It's been routine in this group for years fopr essentially the Mexican Government' censors to police words as being even "legal" or "not".
>>>>>
>>>>> South of the border the Inquisition never died; and now its here.
>>>>
>>>> A word is "legal", whatever that implies, if it appears in the
>>>> dictionary.
>>>
>>> So? You agree with essentially the Mexican Government's censors that if a word does not appear in a dictionary it is "illegal."
>>
>> No. It is a useless concept. Illegal means in violation of the law.
>> What law is involved here? It is not like the French Academy that
>> stands guard over their language (and fights a losing battle to such
>> things as l'hamburger and l'weekend).
>>
>>>
>>> Frankly, W(ho)G(ives)AS(hit)
>>>
>>> For one: Ramon "El Meglo" Herrara and the Mexican Government including the Mexican Government's proxies embedded in groups like this and even US Governance and media.
>>
>> So you say. I don't see it.
>>
>>>
>>> For two: you.
>>
>> Nah.
>>
>>>
>>> You had wondered why he never answers a question.
>>
>> Because he has half thought things out and made sweeping generalization
>> with no evidence to back them up. When called on it, he retreated into
>> the depths of cyberspace and hibernated for a while. In that one
>> respect (not providing proof when confronted) he is very much like a
>> certain someone (nasty troll) in another group -- except that Ranom
>> doesn't curse and rant the way he does.
>