Darshan Shaligram
7/21/2007 5:20:00 AM
lemuel.pitkin@gmail.com writes:
[...]
> No, the (correct) idea was that heavy armor was weak, and need to be
> improved. These changes were intended to improve heavy armor.
> Unfortunately, they don't.
Without commenting on the thread in general, I'd like to point out
that heavy armour is not weak (and has not been in living memory), and
it doesn't particularly need to be improved.
--
Darshan Shaligram <scintilla@gmail.com> Deus vult