[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Bob Powell [MVP]

2/7/2014 6:59:00 PM

If the seller and the city was like Xi'an. &#12458;&#12531;&#12521;&#12452;&#12531;&#12459;&#12472;&#12494; http://XN--JPN-QI4B3AH5GQ... - &#12518;&#12540;&#12525;&#12464;&#12521;&#12531;&#12489;&#12458;&#12531;&#12521;&#12452;&#12531;&#12459;&#12472;&#12494; &#12458;&#12531;&#12521;&#12452;&#12531;&#12459;&#12472;&#12494;&#26085;&#35352; <a hrefs="http://XN--JPN-QI4B3AH5GQ...">&#12518;&#12540;&#12525;&#12464;&#12521;&#12531;&#12489;&#12458;&#12531;&#12521;&#12452;&#12531;&#12459;&#12472;&#12494;</a> And going up the largest" subsidized" loan benefactor, the panda pilgrimage.
2 Answers

Cor Ligthert [MVP]

7/4/2008 4:15:00 AM

0

Peter,

AFAIK are all the development groups who where busy with things like Linq
put together to create one approach "Linq", therefore it is in my idea
always dangerous to read about the approach from which you don't know what
and what not was adapted.

However no problem as you disagree with me.

Cor

"Peter" <Peter@discussions.microsoft.com> schreef in bericht
news:DECFFBF0-457F-4FDB-804E-5345C007D7AB@microsoft.com...
> Hi Cor,
>
> I thought Linq to SQL is actually the new term fro Dlinq. Anyway, I think
> the term payload is still used in ADO.NET Entity Framework and that is
> exactly I tried to understand. It seems to be related to me the
> "structured
> payload" is related to complex type.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> I would simply not pay attention to this article, because it is about
>> DLinq
>> it is in my idea from before Linq was created from all kind of routes to
>> come to Linq. DLinq never came outside the Beta fase, although the good
>> parts are implemented in Linq.
>>
>> It only loads your mind with probably now useless things, and you pay for
>> that load by not concentrating on the usable things.
>>
>> Just my idea
>>
>> Cor
>>
>> "Peter" <Peter@discussions.microsoft.com> schreef in bericht
>> news:4CF12091-DE08-43C5-B3D3-0D1C10EF1281@microsoft.com...
>> > What does the term payload mean in the following links?
>> >
>> > http://dotnetaddict.dotnetdevelopersjournal.com/adoef_vs_l...
>> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/librar...(VS.80).aspx
>> >
>> > Thanks for any help.
>> >
>>

Patrice

7/4/2008 8:09:00 AM

0

I made a quick search. My understanding is that this is a relation ship that
owns attributes.

As a side note I would agree with Cor. As it uses the old term this is
likely based on a beta version and things changed from the beta...

--
Patrice

"Peter" <Peter@discussions.microsoft.com> a ?crit dans le message de groupe
de discussion : DECFFBF0-457F-4FDB-804E-5345C007D7AB@microsoft.com...
> Hi Cor,
>
> I thought Linq to SQL is actually the new term fro Dlinq. Anyway, I think
> the term payload is still used in ADO.NET Entity Framework and that is
> exactly I tried to understand. It seems to be related to me the
> "structured
> payload" is related to complex type.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> I would simply not pay attention to this article, because it is about
>> DLinq
>> it is in my idea from before Linq was created from all kind of routes to
>> come to Linq. DLinq never came outside the Beta fase, although the good
>> parts are implemented in Linq.
>>
>> It only loads your mind with probably now useless things, and you pay for
>> that load by not concentrating on the usable things.
>>
>> Just my idea
>>
>> Cor
>>
>> "Peter" <Peter@discussions.microsoft.com> schreef in bericht
>> news:4CF12091-DE08-43C5-B3D3-0D1C10EF1281@microsoft.com...
>> > What does the term payload mean in the following links?
>> >
>> > http://dotnetaddict.dotnetdevelopersjournal.com/adoef_vs_l...
>> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/librar...(VS.80).aspx
>> >
>> > Thanks for any help.
>> >
>>