Asp Forum - michael kors handbags outlet ak74 - microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db

Katadedajab

12/27/2013 6:28:00 PM

<a href=http://ibmu.org/><b&... kors bags outlet</a>I agree. If you¡¯re going into an all in one discussion,have to on that basis as well as for going to be the sake for example going to be the discussion. I¡¯ve heard that posting words of flattery will allow for one¡¯s search engine rankings,even though I have serious doubts about that for those times when compared for more information regarding going to be the heart similar to SEO,content pieces titles, and quality links. Lord knows, I in many cases are wrong.. <a href=http://ibmu.org/><b&... kors outlet</a>I am therefore happy that I can be able to get a good deal more discount goods in your store available on the internet Ican save money significantly more your family should make sure they know us as fast as possible for this reason that I can be capable of geting a great deal more useful things in the life. <a href=http://jilllucas.com/><b&... kors handbags outlet</a>The bottom line will be the you can¡¯t make subscribers comment. But,all your family members can invite them to educate yourself regarding need to bother about therefore do nothing more than going to be the same as any call to educate yourself regarding action. I¡¯ve never been successful at getting kind comments and when I need to panic about a resource box is the fact that like gold. I be capable of geting a lot more comments everywhere over the the Facebook rss along the lines of my own personal your internet business than I have to worry about everywhere in the my.org version. <a href=http://freebyb.com/><b&... kors outlet</a>Greetings! I are aware of that this may be the somewhat off topic but I was wondering about whether or not all your family knew where I may not care either locate an all in one captcha plugin and for my own personal comment form? I'm using their going to be the same internet site platform as yours and I'm having difficulty finding more then one Thanks a piece of land! <a href=http://jilllucas.com/><b&... kors handbags outlet</a>

4 Answers

William Vaughn

10/8/2007 5:48:00 PM

Ah, I expect he means you can serialize the DataTable(s) to an XML file or
somesuch.
Again, the SQL Server Compact Edition (which supports several kinds of
replication) is a better option.

--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant, Dad, Grandpa
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com
www.betav.com/blog/billva
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________
Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book:
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:522F9B5D-D648-4D7B-99F1-58EAB1B33923@microsoft.com...
> John,
>
> The nature from a dataset is to work ofline, it is build for that.
>
> When you do an update, there is looked if there has been a change (this is
> called optimistic concurrency). The way as the data is organised makes
> that the chanch for that is low or high.
>
> By instance as you are adding and subtrackting values from tablerows,
> instead of adding mutation rows, then you can probably forget it.
>
> Cor

John

10/8/2007 6:08:00 PM

Thanks Bill.

Regards

"William Vaughn" <billvaNoSPAM@betav.com> wrote in message
news:OYv3bNdCIHA.6012@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Ah, I expect he means you can serialize the DataTable(s) to an XML file
> or somesuch.
> Again, the SQL Server Compact Edition (which supports several kinds of
> replication) is a better option.
>
> --
> ____________________________________
> William (Bill) Vaughn
> Author, Mentor, Consultant, Dad, Grandpa
> Microsoft MVP
> INETA Speaker
> www.betav.com
> www.betav.com/blog/billva
> Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> __________________________________
> Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book:
> Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
> and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote in message
> news:522F9B5D-D648-4D7B-99F1-58EAB1B33923@microsoft.com...
>> John,
>>
>> The nature from a dataset is to work ofline, it is build for that.
>>
>> When you do an update, there is looked if there has been a change (this
>> is called optimistic concurrency). The way as the data is organised makes
>> that the chanch for that is low or high.
>>
>> By instance as you are adding and subtrackting values from tablerows,
>> instead of adding mutation rows, then you can probably forget it.
>>
>> Cor
>

William Vaughn

10/10/2007 7:31:00 PM

Cor, you missed the point. Replication in this case is used for data
sharing--not just data persistence.

--
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant, Dad, Grandpa
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com
www.betav.com/blog/billva
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________
Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book:
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Cor Ligthert[MVP]" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:C859F647-3DB1-404A-AC9E-10213DDFA7AC@microsoft.com...
> Bill,
>
> I disagree this with you, for extra database you need replication, with a
> dataset you just needs common updates. The logical problems stays exactly
> the same.
>
> The serialization is completely automaticaly done by Dataset.ReadXML(....)
> and Dataset.WriteXML(....), you write it as if this is a problem.
>
> Cor

Cor Ligthert [MVP]

10/10/2007 10:10:00 PM

> Cor, you missed the point. Replication in this case is used for data
> sharing--not just data persistence.

I did not miss that Bill, however why would you do that if there are now
simple methods possible in ADONET and not only replication. Using a dataset
is in my idea much easier to handle conflicts by your own program.

Cor

microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db

michael kors handbags outlet ak74

Katadedajab

William Vaughn

John

William Vaughn

Cor Ligthert [MVP]

x Login to ForumsZone