Jeff
10/18/2011 11:14:00 PM
On Oct 18, 1:34 pm, Donna <tom.r...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2:23 pm, Donna <tom.r...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 18, 1:45 pm, "who?" <yourimageunre...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > > I said what I said about Paul once that I know of. You're
> > > moving the goal post because I haven't repeated myself
> > > a million times like you all bash Yoko.
>
> > Jeff, your exact words were, "That saying doesn't apply to Yoko and
> > there is nothing to be gained by attacking her. She didn't commit a
> > crime."
>
> > I know I missed a zillion Yoko posts, but from that statement, alone,
> > it doesn't appear that you're saying that people "shouldn't criticize
> > Yoko." You're merely saying that there's nothing to be gained by it.
> > In fact, I don't recall anyone ever stating or even implying such a
> > thing, but that's not to say that no one ever did. Help me out here.
> > Has anyone stated that she should not be criticized?
>
> I should just add one more thing, Jeff. If you're saying that the
> constant repetition bothers you, then why did you start this thread?
> Didn't you know how it would play out?
Smile, Donna. I'm asking you the same thing about questioning
Fatt? Smile some more.
1. I really wrote this thread for Danny clowning around.
2. I meant no harm to Fatt and should have said nothing.
Her and I are friends just like you and I, and UpserTom
are.
3. Tom brings Paul into it. I don't know why.
4. I was bored and started this thread just like people
go out and play ping pong or tennis.
:-)