Trudy Johnson
4/7/2008 1:20:00 AM
In article <ft173e029v2@drn.newsguy.com>, Angela Gupta says...
>
>In article <fsutgi0erm@drn.newsguy.com>, Trudy Johnson says...
>>
>>In article <fsugbf02555@drn.newsguy.com>, Angela Gupta says...
>>>
>>>In article <fss6dq0l4v@drn.newsguy.com>, Trudy Johnson says...
>>>>
>>>>Called user fees [paid by big pharma to FDA], this $400 million a year is
>>>>designed to speed decisions on applications for new drugs. "User fees seem to
>>>>save taxpayers money," says Susan Wood, PhD, the former assistant commissioner
>>>>for women's health at the FDA and now a professor of public health at George
>>>>Washington University. "But they undermine public confidence in the FDA's
>>>>independence and impose time pressures that could end up costing lives."
>>>>Readers Digest, April 2008
>>>>
>>>>Oh, right - and we are supposed to believe that the members of the FDA have
>>>>unbiased opinions about the drugs they are going to approve, huh? I think not -
>>>>these guys are human and very susceptible to these user fees (or rather
>>>>bribes)Who do you think is going to win here, pharma or the public?
>>>>
>>>>Trudy
>>>>
>>>"User fees", huh? I guess that's a kinder, gentler word than "bribery". The
>>>FDA has been bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry. But it's the
>>>poor sods who end up taking these dangerous drugs that pay the real price.
>>>Angela
>>>
>>Exactly - and that is why the FDA needs to be held responsible for its actions.
>>
>>Trudy
>>
>Sure it does, and I mean the individual members should be held accountable for
>all the death and injury they've contributed to by their rubber-stamping
>approvals of every lethal psychiatric drugs that's put in front of them.
>Angela
>
Oh yes! Maybe if they had this to confront, they wouldn't be so "stamp" happy.
Trudy