Asp Forum - Compact connected regular graphs

JT

3/6/2016 10:44:00 AM

How come all graphs using 42 links and more then 84 nodes have compact regular connected solutions?

Did turn off animation for more than a couple of thousands of links so the animation is off when searching but script give message and numerical results on search.

http://jt.node365.se/no...

Do anyone know?

http://jt.node365.se/C...

10 Answers

JT

3/6/2016 1:45:00 PM

Den söndag 6 mars 2016 kl. 11:43:56 UTC+1 skrev jonas.t...@gmail.com:
> How come all graphs using 42 links and more then 84 nodes have compact regular connected solutions?
>
> Did turn off animation for more than a couple of thousands of links so the animation is off when searching but script give message and numerical results on search.
>
> http://jt.node365.se/no...
>
> Do anyone know?
>
>
> http://jt.node365.se/C...

If there only was an ecmascript compatible interpreter with load and save data.

Ben Bacarisse

3/6/2016 2:45:00 PM

jonas.thornvall@gmail.com writes:
<snip>
> If there only was an ecmascript compatible interpreter with load and
> save data.

There is on my system (Linux). I use node.js[1] but there are others.
If you use Windows it might be a bit harder to find something but I'd be
surprised if there's nothing.

[1] https://node...

--
Ben.

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

3/6/2016 6:19:00 PM

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com writes:
> <snip>
>> If there only was an ecmascript compatible interpreter with load and
>> save data.
>
> There is on my system (Linux). I use node.js[1] but there are others.
> If you use Windows it might be a bit harder to find something but I'd be
> surprised if there's nothing.
>
> [1] https://node...

Node.js is _not_ â??an ecmascript compatible interpreterâ?; it is an â??event-
driven I/O server-side JavaScript environment based on V8â? or, IOW, â??a
JavaScript runtime built on Chromeâ??s V8 JavaScript engineâ? (ibid.)

AISB, ECMAScript implementations like Google V8 JavaScript are multi-purpose
programming languages, but they are not self-sufficient: different to other
programming languages, a runtime environment is required to make use of
them. It is then the *environment* that provides features such as the
ability to load and save data, _not_ the implementation or the
â??interpreterâ?. The implementation (programming language and
compiler/interpreter) are *the means to use* the features provided by the
runtime environment.

It is important to be able to separate conceptually, and therefore mentally,
the ECMAScript implementation from the runtime environment in which it is
used. In this case, the *same* implementation (Google V8 JavaScript) can
also be used in a *different* environment (e.g., Google Chrome and, in
general, Chromium-based applications) that provides a *different* set of
*additional* features.

I cannot stress this enough: The *same* source code works *unchanged* in
different environments only as long it only uses *features common to both
environments*; in the minimum case, it only uses features that are provided
by the *implementation*. And even that is true only as long as the
*versions* of the implementation are either *the same or compatible* with
regard to the *used* features.

--
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.... | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de...
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-...
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

3/6/2016 6:21:00 PM

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> jonas.thornvall@gmail.com writes:
> <snip>
>> If there only was an ecmascript compatible interpreter with load and
>> save data.
>
> There is on my system (Linux).

Thatâ??s _GNU/Linux_ or _GNU+Linux_. Give everyone involved in making it at
least equal credit, please.

<http://www.gnu.org/home.e...

> I use node.js[1] but there are others. If you use Windows it might be a
> bit harder to find something but I'd be surprised if there's nothing.
>
> [1] https://node...

Node.js is _not_ â??an ecmascript compatible interpreterâ?; it is an â??event-
driven I/O server-side JavaScript environment based on V8â? or, IOW, â??a
JavaScript runtime built on Chromeâ??s V8 JavaScript engineâ? (ibid.)

AISB, ECMAScript implementations like Google V8 JavaScript are multi-purpose
programming languages, but they are not self-sufficient: different to other
programming languages, a runtime environment is required to make use of
them. It is then the *environment* that provides features such as the
ability to load and save data, _not_ the implementation or the
â??interpreterâ?. The implementation (programming language and
compiler/interpreter) are *the means to use* the features provided by the
runtime environment.

It is important to be able to separate conceptually, and therefore mentally,
the ECMAScript implementation from the runtime environment in which it is
used. In this case, the *same* implementation (Google V8 JavaScript) can
also be used in a *different* environment (e.g., Google Chrome and, in
general, Chromium-based applications) that provides a *different* set of
*additional* features.

I cannot stress this enough: The *same* source code works *unchanged* in
different environments only as long it only uses *features common to both
environments*; in the minimum case, it only uses features that are provided
by the *implementation*. And even that is true only as long as the
*versions* of the implementation are either *the same or compatible* with
regard to the *used* features.

--
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.... | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de...
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-...
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Ben Bacarisse

3/6/2016 8:30:00 PM

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
<snip>
> I cannot stress this enough: [...]

Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
kill-file? Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
are maybe too long? What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?

<snip>
--
Ben.

Chris M. Thomasson

3/6/2016 8:42:00 PM

On 3/6/2016 2:43 AM, jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote:
> How come all graphs using 42 links and more then 84
> nodes have compact regular connected solutions?

> Did turn off animation for more than a couple of
> thousands of links so the animation is off when
> searching but script give message and numerical
> results on search.

> http://jt.node365.se/no...

> Do anyone know?

> http://jt.node365.se/C...

FWIW, you just might find the following information
to be fairly interesting:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K...

Also, research:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

And search the text of the html for the string "Kautz"...

;^)

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

3/6/2016 10:21:00 PM

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
> <snip>
>> I cannot stress this enough: [...]
>
> Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
> kill-file?

Yes. However, if you would do it you would risk getting added to killfiles
of other people as well. I do not think that you are *that* stupid.

> Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
> are maybe too long?

The length of your attribution lines is appropriate, although you could omit
the â??Fromâ? address as well so that they, when quoted, would not as quickly
exceed the customary limit of 80 characters per line unless wrapped, which
would otherwise make discussions in which you participate harder to read.
Which of course is what my saying â??attribution *line*, _not_ attribution
novelâ? is all about.

> What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?

That would be a stupid thing to do; see above.

--
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.... | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de...
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-...
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Ben Bacarisse

3/6/2016 10:37:00 PM

How about top posting with a full quote -- will that do it?

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>> <snip>
>>> I cannot stress this enough: [...]
>>
>> Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
>> kill-file?
>
> Yes. However, if you would do it you would risk getting added to killfiles
> of other people as well. I do not think that you are *that* stupid.
>
>> Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
>> are maybe too long?
>
> The length of your attribution lines is appropriate, although you could omit
> the â??Fromâ? address as well so that they, when quoted, would not as quickly
> exceed the customary limit of 80 characters per line unless wrapped, which
> would otherwise make discussions in which you participate harder to read.
> Which of course is what my saying â??attribution *line*, _not_ attribution
> novelâ? is all about.
>
>> What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?
>
> That would be a stupid thing to do; see above.

--
Ben.

John Harris

3/7/2016 2:05:00 PM

On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 19:21:13 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars@web.de> wrote:

<snip>
>the runtime environment
<snip>

Its real name is the computational environment. See ECMA 262.

John

Stefan Weiss

3/7/2016 3:48:00 PM

Hello Ben,

it looks like your client has stripped the signatures from your helpful
fullquote. What a shame. I have manually added them back.

- stefan

On the sixth day of the month of March in the year 2016 in the Common
Era, Ben Bacarisse wrote to the group comp.lang.Javascript:

> How about top posting with a full quote -- will that do it?
>
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>>> <snip>
>>>> I cannot stress this enough: [...]
>>>
>>> Not I this: is there anything more I can do to get you to add me to your
>>> kill-file?
>>
>> Yes. However, if you would do it you would risk getting added to killfiles
>> of other people as well. I do not think that you are *that* stupid.
>>
>>> Sadly I post under my real name, but my attribution lines
>>> are maybe too long?
>>
>> The length of your attribution lines is appropriate, although you could omit
>> the â??Fromâ? address as well so that they, when quoted, would not as quickly
>> exceed the customary limit of 80 characters per line unless wrapped, which
>> would otherwise make discussions in which you participate harder to read.
>> Which of course is what my saying â??attribution *line*, _not_ attribution
>> novelâ? is all about.
>>
>>> What if I were to stop snipping in my replies?
>>
>> That would be a stupid thing to do; see above.
>>
>> --
>> PointedEars
>> FAQ: <http://PointedEars.... | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de...
>> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-...
>> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
>
> --
> Ben.

--
A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Original content of this message licensed under the WTFPL.
Wisdom is wearying, folly is fun.
Follow me on Facebook!
Ask me about cheap offers for Cialis and panda pheromones.
ð??©

comp.lang.javascript

Compact connected regular graphs

JT

JT

Ben Bacarisse

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

Ben Bacarisse

Chris M. Thomasson

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

Ben Bacarisse

John Harris

Stefan Weiss

x Login to ForumsZone