Kenneth Tilton
5/8/2016 4:02:00 AM
On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 2:04:12 PM UTC-4, Paul Rubin wrote:
> His Kennyness <kentilton@gmail.com> writes:
> > * but now that I am doing it I like the vibrant/capable community. It
> > seems like the Second Coming for Lisp.
>
> Yeah, lots of really respected Lispers said things like that about
> Clojure at Lisp50. Doesn't the Java entanglement drive you nuts though?
"Entanglement"? I ignore that it runs on the JVM. If I ever need a library, I suspect I will find one (but I usually find them in Lisp or via CFFI, so not much of an issue).
Did you mean something else?
> Is wanting a Clojure decoupled from Java a sane desire?
Sure, if one loves the Clojure functional state thang and has issues with the JVM. But then it might be better to come up with an STM library for CL.
>
> I can tell you that being into Haskell has helped me find work, even if
> the work doesn't itself involve Haskell. So bigger toolboxes are a good
> thing.
Yep.
-hk