[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.programming

Read more, it is a happy day !

Ramine

4/18/2016 4:36:00 PM

Hello,


Read more, it is a happy day !

I will make more precise my proof that the USL methodology works !

If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger, there
is more chance to hit the contention with fewer cores and fewer threads
when you test and analyses with USL methodology, so this will allow
USL methodology to forecast farther scalability, even if the parallel
part of the Amdahl's law is variable there is a lower chance from
the empirical performance data to escape the contention , so when there
is a lower chance to espace contention , so the nonlinear regression
of USL will hit the contention and thus will be able to predict
with a good approximation the scalability.

If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger and
system makes the chance higher to escape the contention when we test
and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology,
that means that the chance is higher that the next step with 2X or 3X
or 4X or 5X or even 6X the number of cores and threads will be a better
approximation of the case when we test and analyses with fewer threads
an fewer cores with USL methodology.

But when the serial part of the Amdahl's law is smaller, that
means that the chance is higher to escape the contention when we test
and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, so
this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability.

So in my opinion USL methodology is able to forecast farther scalability
and is a success and is a great and amazing tool !

You have seen me, in this post, giving a proof about the USL methodology
that it works..

But i think we can be confident with the USL methodology
from Dr. Gunther , because Dr. Gunther is an expert
that knows what he is doing, so i think USL methodology
is working well and it is a great tool that can predict
scalability.

Here is the website of the Dr. Gunther the author of USL
methodology.

http://www.perfdyn...

And read here about it:

http://www.perfdyn...Manifesto/USLscalability.html


I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my
programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you.

You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-...


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.



3 Answers

Richard Heathfield

4/18/2016 1:44:00 PM

0

On 18/04/16 17:35, Ramine wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Read more, it is a happy day !

Nowadays I have a considerable capacity for tolerance, but you have
finally exceeded that capacity.

Usenet is not a write-only medium.

*PLONK*

--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Ramine

4/18/2016 5:26:00 PM

0

On 4/18/2016 9:35 AM, Ramine wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Read more, it is a happy day !
>
> I will make more precise my proof that the USL methodology works !
>
> If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger, there
> is more chance to hit the contention with fewer cores and fewer threads
> when you test and analyses with USL methodology, so this will allow
> USL methodology to forecast farther scalability, even if the parallel
> part of the Amdahl's law is variable there is a lower chance from
> the empirical performance data to escape the contention , so when there
> is a lower chance to espace contention , so the nonlinear regression


I mean here: escape, not espace.

> of USL will hit the contention and thus will be able to predict
> with a good approximation the scalability.
>
> If the serial part of the Amdahl's equation is bigger and
> system makes the chance higher to escape the contention when we test
> and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology,
> that means that the chance is higher that the next step with 2X or 3X
> or 4X or 5X or even 6X the number of cores and threads will be a better
> approximation of the case when we test and analyses with fewer threads
> an fewer cores with USL methodology.
>
> But when the serial part of the Amdahl's law is smaller, that
> means that the chance is higher to escape the contention when we test
> and analyses with fewer threads an fewer cores with USL methodology, so
> this will allow USL methodology to forecast farther scalability.
>
> So in my opinion USL methodology is able to forecast farther scalability
> and is a success and is a great and amazing tool !
>
> You have seen me, in this post, giving a proof about the USL methodology
> that it works..
>
> But i think we can be confident with the USL methodology
> from Dr. Gunther , because Dr. Gunther is an expert
> that knows what he is doing, so i think USL methodology
> is working well and it is a great tool that can predict
> scalability.
>
> Here is the website of the Dr. Gunther the author of USL
> methodology.
>
> http://www.perfdyn...
>
> And read here about it:
>
> http://www.perfdyn...Manifesto/USLscalability.html
>
>
> I have included the 32 bit and 64 bit windows executables of my
> programs inside the zip file to easy the job for you.
>
> You can download my USL programs version 3.0 with the source code from:
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-...
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
>
>

kenobi

4/19/2016 5:03:00 PM

0

W dniu poniedzialek, 18 kwietnia 2016 15:44:05 UTC+2 uzytkownik Richard Heathfield napisal:
> On 18/04/16 17:35, Ramine wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > Read more, it is a happy day !
>
> Nowadays I have a considerable capacity for tolerance, but you have
> finally exceeded that capacity.
>
> Usenet is not a write-only medium.
>
> *PLONK*
>
the succes is though in that that our donkey will get to know that all programmers would treat him as a brickass spammer and abuser and (thus also an idiot) (even me who is rather torelable for oryginals - being myself oryginal).. this
anti-brick-ass front is some advance imo
(comparing to the previous state when i see this moron as a some kind of braindamaged freak - he floated down from the freak to brickass spammer)