Asp Forum - Multiple linear regression was updated to version 1.1

Ramine

2/22/2016 10:22:00 PM

Hello,

Multiple linear regression was updated to version 1.1

You can download it from:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/multiple-linear-...

Authors: Amine Moulay Ramdane

Description:

Multiple linear regression that uses SIMD SSE2 instructions and that
implements the following mathematical theorem:

If A is an m x n rank n matrix, then the least-squares solutions to the
system A*vector(X) = vector(C) are the solutions to the system:

A*vector(X)=

A*inverse(transpose(A)*A))*transpose(A)*vector(C).

This system has the following unique solution:

vector(X) = inverse(transpose(A)*A)*transpose(A)*vector(C)

I have updated my multiple linear regression program to support SSE
(Standard Error of the Estimate), the "SSE" is important in quality
control, the interpretation of SSE is similar to standard deviation's
"68-95-99 rule", that is, 68% of the time the predicted score will fall
plus-or-minus 1 x SSE of the actual score based on the regression
equation, 95% of the time the predicted score will fall plus-or-minus 2
x SSE , and 99% of the time the predicted score will fall plus-or-minus
3 x SSE.

So my Multiple linear regression program does show the multiple
regression equation that approximate the statistical data and it
calculates and shows the Coefficient of determination R2 and it
calculates and shows the Standard Error of the Estimate.

I have also included a Matrix library called LinMath that uses SIMD SSE2
instructions and that is multithreaded, LinMath was derived fom mrmath
Matrix library by Rabatscher Michael and modified to become compatible
with both FreePascal and Delphi.

LinMath is offered under the licence agreement described on:

http://www.m...

Please note that the example inside the "test.pas" inside the zip file
have a mathematical function of 4 variables as:

a5:=f(a1,a2,a3,a4)

but notice that if you are using a mathematical function of 4 variables
as in my example inside the test.pas source code, the 5th variable
inside the mat2 matrix must be always 1, this is how my solver works,
but if you have a mathematical function of 2 variables the 3th variable
inside the mat2 matrix must be always 1 , please take a look at the
source code inside the "test.pas" example and you will understand , it's
really easy to work with my multiple linear regression solver.

Language: FPC Pascal v2.2.0+ / Delphi 7+: http://www.freep...

Operating Systems: Windows.

Required FPC switches: -O3 -Sd

-Sd for delphi mode....

Required Delphi switches: -$H+

Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

18 Answers

Craig Gaynell Mccurry

2/9/2013 12:42:00 AM

Yoorghis: Real name Gary Richard Roselles. Before he was exposed he
changed his name every few days or weeks mainly because he's a
sociopathic coward, a pussy, and above all else a LIAR and a
time-waster. Gary is another example of a Complete Loser: He is
festering away in a one-bedroom apartment on Medicaid and Social
Security having wasted his entire life...

Gary uses "X-No-Archive: yes" in his message Header to force
server-side deletion of ALL of his posts and this is usually the only
way to detect his presence (unless you detect the strong odor of
shit).

Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you encourage them to
continue lying.

Gary Richard Roselles (68+)
Diane M Roselles (52+)
4215 Cedar Ridge Pl, Apt 42
Rapid City, SD 57702-3190
(605) 341-2445

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallof... asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:01:22 -0700, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:
>The federal govt can command state "militias" (NGuard) anytime it
>wants.
>We don'thave militias, we have National guards
>They are under federal authority

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When National Guard units are not under federal control, the governor
is the commander-in-chief of the units of his or her respective state,
territory (Guam, Virgin Islands), or commonwealth (Puerto Rico). The
President of the United States commands the District of Columbia
National Guard, though this command is routinely delegated to the
Commanding General of the DC National Guard. States are free to employ
their National Guard forces under state control for state purposes and
at state expense as provided in the state?s constitution and statutes.
In doing so, Governors, as commanders-in-chief, can directly access
and utilize the Guard?s federally assigned aircraft, vehicles and
other equipment so long as the federal government is reimbursed for
the use of fungible equipment and supplies such as fuel, food stocks,
etc. This is the authority under which Governors activate and deploy
National Guard forces in response to natural disasters. It is also the
authority under which Governors deploy National Guard forces in
response to man-made emergencies such as riots and civil unrest, or
terrorist attacks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Guard_of_the_Uni...

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallof...

Yoorghis

2/9/2013 1:56:00 AM

On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:10:23 -0600, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:

>>> Really? That's your definition of welfare?
>>
>>
>>
>> What's yours?
>>
>>
>
>Your dodge is noted.
>
>Food stamps, housing, & free school lunches are a few.
>
>The money is coming straight from taxpayers, through the federal
>government filter (so they can keep 72% of all dollars and going to
>people that do not have to do anything to get the handouts.

A pittance compared to the massive subsidies of profitable
corporations, the tax writeoff, the huge tax breaks, CEO salaries
shielded by offshore accounts, ....

The bottom 2/3rds tax burden (B-U-R-D-E-N) is a huge compared to those
any billionaire/millionaires pay.

Some corporations making billions in profits pay no taxes.

PATRICK

2/9/2013 4:01:00 PM

On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:56:02 -0700, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:10:23 -0600, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>
>>>> Really? That's your definition of welfare?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What's yours?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Your dodge is noted.
>>
>>Food stamps, housing, & free school lunches are a few.
>>
>>The money is coming straight from taxpayers, through the federal
>>government filter (so they can keep 72% of all dollars and going to
>>people that do not have to do anything to get the handouts.
>
>A pittance compared to the massive subsidies of profitable
>corporations, the tax writeoff, the huge tax breaks, CEO salaries
>shielded by offshore accounts, ....
>
>The bottom 2/3rds tax burden (B-U-R-D-E-N) is a huge compared to those
>any billionaire/millionaires pay.
>
>Some corporations making billions in profits pay no taxes.

Try to make more changes.
Those corporations will merely move their headquarters and plants to
countries that will not tax them as much.
Where do you want jobs?
Here? Or overseas?
Change the laws if you don't like them.

Yoorghis

2/9/2013 5:40:00 PM

On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:01:27 -0500, Patrick <pbarker001@woh.rr.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:56:02 -0700, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:10:23 -0600, Mike Smith <mws@wt.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Really? That's your definition of welfare?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What's yours?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Your dodge is noted.
>>>
>>>Food stamps, housing, & free school lunches are a few.
>>>
>>>The money is coming straight from taxpayers, through the federal
>>>government filter (so they can keep 72% of all dollars and going to
>>>people that do not have to do anything to get the handouts.
>>
>>A pittance compared to the massive subsidies of profitable
>>corporations, the tax writeoff, the huge tax breaks, CEO salaries
>>shielded by offshore accounts, ....
>>
>>The bottom 2/3rds tax burden (B-U-R-D-E-N) is a huge compared to those
>>any billionaire/millionaires pay.
>>
>>Some corporations making billions in profits pay no taxes.
>
>Try to make more changes.
>Those corporations will merely move their headquarters and plants to
>countries that will not tax them as much.
>Where do you want jobs?
>Here? Or overseas?
>Change the laws if you don't like them.

The ONLY way those corporations would "move"----is IF they could skate
on taxes.--compliments of republican congress/president

The ONLY way those corporations will hire out of country---is if the
tax code and regulations allow them--compliments of republican
congress/president

The Long fucked up dereglation and dismantling of the rules,
regulations and laws since the 90's---has made it easier, cheaper and
more profitible NOT to create jobs here, NOT to invest here---because
the republican party sold Lies about WHO would benefit from
supply-side economics.

WE lost wages, benefits, wealth, jobs, investment, saw over $3
Trillion transferred to the top, 9,000,000 lost jobs, over $8 Trillion
debt/deficit all caused by republicans---who you now defend.

Lee Curtiss

2/9/2013 9:49:00 PM

Mike Smith wrote:

> On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:51:12 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
>
> > Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:16:26 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Mike Smith wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:04:07 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
> >> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > duke wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:07:09 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
> >> >> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > duke wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:11:30 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
> >> >> >> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > Tracey12 wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> Conservatives are being called "anti-government"
> because >> they >> >> >> oppose >> Obama's radical left wing style of
> leading >> the nation. >> >> >> Yet, this is >> just one more tool
> being used >> by the left to >> >> silence >> opposition. >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Conservatives are not anti-government.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > True. They are pro-big government. "Papers please"
> >> >> >> >> > identity checks, mandatory vaginal probes, drug tests
> >> >> >> >> > on welfare recipiants - if there is a big government
> >> >> >> >> > intrusion into private lives, there is a Republican
> >> >> >> >> > policy behind it.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Those on government welfare should be mandated by law to
> >> pass a >> >> drug >> test to receive benefits.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Fine.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Make that apply to farmers getting crop
> >> >> >> > subsidies and bankers getting bailouts and
> >> >> >> > federal welfare to "faith-based" charities
> >> >> >> > and you've got a deal.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Fine with me. In my occupation, I had to submit to random
> drug >> >> >> tests. As far as I'm concerned, ALL should be required
> to do >> so. >> >>
> >> >> >> But you take about farmers. Why do farmers get subsidies?
> Is >> it >> not >> to control production of crop amounts so as to
> control >> the >> pricing. >> Why do bankers get bailouts? Is it
> not to >> protect the >> working man >> using the bank to remain
> solvent? >> >> >>
> >> >> >> And where do "faith-based" charities get welfare. If
> anything, >> >> it's >> to help the down and out that need help, not
> the Church or >> >> it's >> parishioners. The Church and it's
> parishioners are the >> ones >> funding >> the charities.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > They are all getting federal welfare, the
> >> >> > drug testing requirement should apply to all -
> >> >> > or neither,.......
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry, dumbass. None of your boogy-men are getting welfare from
> the >> >> USA.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You really think the CEO's at Bear Stearns
> >> > and AIG EARNED the federal bailouts they used
> >> > to enrich themselves with?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Really? That's your definition of welfare?
> >
> >
> >
> > What's yours?
> >
>
> The money is coming straight from taxpayers, through the federal
> government filter (so they can keep 72% of all dollars and going to
> people that do not have to do anything to get the handouts.

Just like the Bush bailouts to Big Banks,
just like the Bush bailouts to Big Insurance,
just like the bush bailouts to Wall Street.

When do we start drug testing THEM?

Q Elam

2/9/2013 11:59:00 PM

Chantel Kearns-Hanson

2/10/2013

Lee Curtis is mostly stupid, a proven liar and an ultra-left crackpot.
Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you encourage them to
continue lying.

[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallof... asks
"Why do you always LIE?"

[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:29:40 -0500, "Lee Curtis" <cleetiss@gmail.com>
wrote:
>"The president has cut taxes 40 times, including 17 times
>for small businesses. He signed into law a plan for 100 per
>cent business expensing to help businesses grow, and a payroll
>tax holiday to help American families and the economy. And
>he wants to reform the corporate tax code by eliminating
>loopholes, lowering the corporate tax rate and encouraging
>investment in the US. Exports have increased by 19 per cent
>since his call last year for a doubling of exports by 2014."
>http://tinyurl.c...

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your link is:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/75f62250-4441-11e0-931d-00144feab49a,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F75f62250-4441-11e0-931d-00144feab49a.html&_i_referer=#axz...

It DOES NOT CONTAIN your quote.........

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallof...

Mike Smith

2/10/2013 1:43:00 AM

On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:48:43 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
<cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:

>Mike Smith wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:51:12 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
>> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Mike Smith wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:16:26 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
>> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Mike Smith wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:04:07 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
>> >> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > duke wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:07:09 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
>> >> >> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > duke wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:11:30 -0600, "Lee Curtiss"
>> >> >> >> >> <cleetis@verizon.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> > Tracey12 wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> Conservatives are being called "anti-government"
>> because >> they >> >> >> oppose >> Obama's radical left wing style of
>> leading >> the nation. >> >> >> Yet, this is >> just one more tool
>> being used >> by the left to >> >> silence >> opposition. >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Conservatives are not anti-government.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> > True. They are pro-big government. "Papers please"
>> >> >> >> >> > identity checks, mandatory vaginal probes, drug tests
>> >> >> >> >> > on welfare recipiants - if there is a big government
>> >> >> >> >> > intrusion into private lives, there is a Republican
>> >> >> >> >> > policy behind it.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Those on government welfare should be mandated by law to
>> >> pass a >> >> drug >> test to receive benefits.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Fine.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Make that apply to farmers getting crop
>> >> >> >> > subsidies and bankers getting bailouts and
>> >> >> >> > federal welfare to "faith-based" charities
>> >> >> >> > and you've got a deal.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Fine with me. In my occupation, I had to submit to random
>> drug >> >> >> tests. As far as I'm concerned, ALL should be required
>> to do >> so. >> >>
>> >> >> >> But you take about farmers. Why do farmers get subsidies?
>> Is >> it >> not >> to control production of crop amounts so as to
>> control >> the >> pricing. >> Why do bankers get bailouts? Is it
>> not to >> protect the >> working man >> using the bank to remain
>> solvent? >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> And where do "faith-based" charities get welfare. If
>> anything, >> >> it's >> to help the down and out that need help, not
>> the Church or >> >> it's >> parishioners. The Church and it's
>> parishioners are the >> ones >> funding >> the charities.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > They are all getting federal welfare, the
>> >> >> > drug testing requirement should apply to all -
>> >> >> > or neither,.......
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry, dumbass. None of your boogy-men are getting welfare from
>> the >> >> USA.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > You really think the CEO's at Bear Stearns
>> >> > and AIG EARNED the federal bailouts they used
>> >> > to enrich themselves with?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Really? That's your definition of welfare?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > What's yours?
>> >
>>
>> The money is coming straight from taxpayers, through the federal
>> government filter (so they can keep 72% of all dollars and going to
>> people that do not have to do anything to get the handouts.
>
>
> Just like the Bush bailouts to Big Banks,
>just like the Bush bailouts to Big Insurance,
>just like the bush bailouts to Wall Street.
>
> When do we start drug testing THEM?
>

It is not your fault. our parents combined some defective DNA and you
were created without the ability to analyze anything.

Now, for a government quiz... Who was in charge of Congress when all
three of your mis-statements happened? And why was Congress key to
this mess?

Mike Smith

PATRICK

2/10/2013 6:34:00 PM

Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:

>WE lost wages, benefits, wealth, jobs, investment, saw over $3
>Trillion transferred to the top, 9,000,000 lost jobs, over $8 Trillion
>debt/deficit all caused by republicans---who you now defend.

http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/02/22/democrats-caused-the-recession-and-republicans-tried-t...

Democrats caused the recession and Republicans tried to stop it
Who caused this economic downturn and what should we do about it?

Almost no one realizes that this entire subprime lending mess was
created by the Community Reinvestment Act, which was passed by
President Carter, a Democrat, in 1977. Later on in the 1990s, Bill
Clinton, another Democrat, passed laws to enforce the original bill.
The purpose of the CRA is to force banks to make risky loans to people
who can?t afford to repay those loans.

The extremely left-wing Los Angeles Times explains in 1999 that the
CRA was passed to force banks to make risky loans.

Under Clinton, bank regulators have breathed the first real life into
enforcement of the Community Reinvestment Act, a 20-year-old statute
meant to combat ?redlining? by requiring banks to serve their
low-income communities. The administration also has sent a clear
message by stiffening enforcement of the fair housing and fair lending
laws.

?

In 1992, Congress mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their
purchases of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers.
Operating under that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been
aggressive and creative in stimulating minority gains? Fannie Mae has
agreed to buy more loans with very low down payments?or with mortgage
payments that represent an unusually high percentage of a buyer?s
income. That?s made banks willing to lend to lower-income families
they once might have rejected.

The extremely left-wing New York Times noted in 1999 that the GSEs
gave out the risky loans under duress from Democrat Bill Clinton.

Fannie Mae, the nation?s biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has
been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to
expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt
pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in
profits.

In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have
been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called
subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and
savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can
only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest
rates ? anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than
conventional loans.

According to the New York Times in 2003, George W. Bush tried to stop
the Democrats from ruining the economy with these forced loans. He was
blocked by Democrats like Barney Frank.

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant
regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings
and loan crisis a decade ago.

?

?These two entities ? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ? are not facing any
kind of financial crisis,? said Representative Barney Frank of
Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services
Committee. ?The more people exaggerate these problems, the more
pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of
affordable housing.?

Here are some video clips to prove that the Democrats opposed
regulating the GSEs. They are responsible for this mess, along with
the irresponsible people who signed up for these loans that they could
not repay.

Timeline of the events in the crisis: Bush was the first to recommend
regulating the GSEs in April, 2001. In 2003, Bush tried to create a
new federal agency to regulate the GSEs. He was blocked from doing so
by the Democrats in the Senate, especially by Barney Frank. In 2005,
Alan Greenspan warned that failing to regulate the GSEs could be a
catastrophe. Again, Democrats blocked the effort to regulate Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac. The video shows Democrat Chuck Schumer protesting
that regulation is not needed. In 2006, McCain and other Republicans
introduced a bill to regulate the GSEs. Again, the Democrats voted
against it and nothing happened.

Republicans and Democrats in their own words on the GSE accounting
practices: Here we have Republican Rep. Richard Baker, Democrat,
Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters, Democrat Rep. Gregory Meeks, Republican
Rep. Ed Royce, Democrat Rep. Lacy Clay, Republican Rep. Christopher
Shays, Democrat Rep. Arthur Davis, Democrat Rep. Barney Frank,
Republican Rep. Don Manzullo. Shays notes that the GSEs make many
contributions to Democrats who are blocking their regulation.

Fannie Mae CEO addresses Democrats: Fannie Mae CEO calling Obama and
the Dems the ?Family? and ?Conscience? of Fannie Mae. The Democrats
obstructed the regulation of the GSEs while taking political
contributions from them, especially Obama. Franklin Raines, Jamie
Gorelick and Jim Johnson were all executives at the GSEs and are all
Democrats. Other Democrats like Penny Pritzker ran other mortgage
banks into the ground, and now work for Obama.

According to Human Events, Obama himself sued banks on behalf of
ACORN, to force the banks to make these risky loans.

Obama sued Citibank under the Community Reinvestment Act in a typical
ACORN-style lawsuit to force the bank to make these risky loans. ACORN
filed many of this type of lawsuit alleging racism in all of them.

According to opensecrets.org, Obama was also the second-highest
recipient of political contributions from the GSEs. The American
Spectator notes that he included 5.2 billion dollars of taxpayer money
for ACORN in the porkulus bill.

UPDATE 1: The Achoress just posted even more of the history of this
mess here. She has a link to Nice Deb?s post which contains about 2
dozen warnings issued by the Bush administration about the looming
crisis, including 17 warnings in 2008 alone.

Yoorghis

2/11/2013 4:31:00 AM

On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:34:02 -0500, Patrick <pbarker001@woh.rr.com>
wrote:

>Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>WE lost wages, benefits, wealth, jobs, investment, saw over $3
>>Trillion transferred to the top, 9,000,000 lost jobs, over $8 Trillion
>>debt/deficit all caused by republicans---who you now defend.

>
>Democrats caused the recession and Republicans tried to stop it
>Who caused this economic downturn and what should we do about it?

How did Democrats "cause a recession" when from 1995 to
date---Democrats have not CONTROLLED congress?

The Economic model we operate under is Modified Raygun policy (a
disaster)

The monetary and financial regulations (what's left of them) are all
Republican made...

Over 75% of ALL debt/deficit was put there by Republicans (I just
listed them all)

The tax code and tax cuts devastated our ability to pay for spending

The domestic spending alone by republicans outstripped Democrats 3
times over

And the last 5 years has seen republicans causing massive economic
problems as they refuse to help recovery.

IDIOT.

comp.programming

Multiple linear regression was updated to version 1.1

Ramine

Craig Gaynell Mccurry

Yoorghis

PATRICK

Yoorghis

Lee Curtiss

Q Elam

Chantel Kearns-Hanson

Mike Smith

PATRICK

Yoorghis

x Login to ForumsZone