Ramine
1/4/2016 9:58:00 PM
Here is my political philosophy in english that i have corrected...
Hello........
I am good arab , and you have seen me giving you a
logical proof about nazism... so becareful
please because in politics you have to take into
consideration empiric facts and also the theory and
you have to use rationality and logic to improve your
knowledge, so becareful please i am not kinding, because
i have just talked about nazism that has oppressed a lot,
so be intelligent and kind in that you have to build
with wisdom, and the wisdom don't contradict the fact
of the principales of wisdom of my proof, so please reread
my proof i have just corrected a typo in it:
I am like new to this forum of soc.culture.usa, i have posted
few posts here many years ago , but i was not good in english,
so i have a little bit improved more my english, and this level of
improvement of my english has allowed me to post to you a proof that
contradict the very basis principales of nazism... and now i will
continu to refine my logical proof...
Please read again this part of my logical proof:
"The nazis were calling there political party national socialism..
But if we get into logic,by the definition of socialism,
socialism have also to take into consideration and help poor
and weak people of the nation, and those poor and weak people of
the nation are called also racially inferiors, and since socialism
is defined by that , so calling yourself a socialist means also
that you must not oppress other nations, so there is a big logical
contradiction in nazism since nazism was calling its political party
national socialist."
So i will refine more my logical proof by saying this:
I have affirmed in my logic the true fact that:
"But if we get into logic,by the definition of socialism,
socialism have also to take into consideration and help poor
and weak people of the nation, and those poor and weak people of
the nation are called also racially inferiors"
But the political party of nazism was calling itself:
National socialist.
So follow with me my logic now:
When you call yourself national socialist that means
by definition of national socialism that you have also
to take into consideration and help poor and weak people
of the nation, and those poor and weak people of the nation
are called also racially inferiors.. so national socialism
doesn't contradict the definition of socialism since
taking into consideration poor and weak people of the nation
that are called also racially inferiors will bring
us logically to affirm that those racially inferiors
of the nation look like by there racial inferiority to
the racial inferiority and inferiority of other nations,
so this logical fact about national socialism that is true
must forbid us to oppress other nations, so nazism
has made a big logical contradiction by oppressing like he was
oppressing others and by oppressing people, so nazism
that calls himself national socialist is a logically insane
philosophy as is his followers.
I am a good arab and here is my wisdom for today:
You can not define the whole by a part of the whole,
you have to take into consideration all the parts
of the whole to make definitions.
And my second wisdom that is very important:
You have to take fuzzy logic into consideration when
dealing with people and with people of this forum.
I am a good arab and not a muslim, and here is another wisdom
of my wisdom:
Wisdom don't come from the sky, you have to improve and refine
more your logic and rationality to bring wisdom and to improve your
wisdom.
So don't be blind like a cat that has weak rationality and weak
logic.
I am a good arab, and i have said on my previous post
my following wisdom:
"Wisdom don't come from the sky, you have to improve
and refine more your logic and rationality to bring wisdom
and to improve your wisdom."
Why have i said: "Wisdom don't come from the sky", and
i have not said "Wisdom doesn't come from the sky"?
i have not used "doesn't" , because i meant implicitly
by wisdom the things or parts of the wisdom, this
is why i said "Wisdom don't" and not "Wisdom doesn't".
Here is another of my proof with fuzzy logic..
You have to take, in politics, fuzzy logic into consideration
not just boolean logic..
If you are blind like a cat that has a weak wisdom and
a weak rationality and a weak logic, you will say that
blacks are blacks with there problems of blacks and whites
are whites, so you will rapidly like a blind cat say that
we have to discriminate blacks and this is an oppression,
this fact also, also apply to arabs, but this is not the
way that it must be, because you are not taking into
consideration fuzzy logic and this is dangerous, because
today you have to take into consideration economy and you
have to penetrate the economic market of others like arabs
and africans to become more rich and you have to doing it
with wisdom and well, so if you take into consideration
fuzzy logic, you have to say that to penetrate the economic
market of arabs and africans so that to become richer we have
to give in return to blacks here and to arabs here, and that
means that we have to not discriminate and not to oppress blacks
and arabs here. That's the way it is with fuzzy logic.
And my proof above bring you to my following wisdom,
that i have posted before, here it is:
"You have to take fuzzy logic into consideration when
dealing with people and with people of this forum."
I am a good arab and now i will give my logical proof
about Donald Trump..
Donald Trump is like the defects of the scientology
philosophy, the scientology philosophy neglects for example
the defects of genetics, so it is less apte to give judgement
and to make good rational judgement and it is less apte to improve
wisdom, because wisdom is not less rationality and
is not less logic but it is more rationality and more logic,
Donald Trump is by empiric statistics less rational and less
logic, because he is blinded by his narcissic character and
he is blinded by his lake of a hard scientific discipline,
this is why i say to Donald Trump that success in presidency is
not just economics but also a hard scientific discipline
into logic and rationality, this is what makes Donald
Trump not suitable for presidency. This my proof
that follows wisdom that is disciplined by rationality
and logic.
My proof now is about presidency:
One of the must is to penetrate the economic market of others with
wisdom to become richer, and this criteria must be treated
with wisdom and hard scientific discipline that takes into
account fuzzy logic, because in fuzzy logic you have to
make your chance of success more probable, it's like also
probability in mathematics that you must optimize more to
render it more efficient, and by reasonning so, you have
in my opinion to approximate the criterion that makes a man
or a women suitable for presidency, by choosing the wisdom
as a quality and as a criterion , so Donald Trump is not suitable
for that, because Donald Trump is a warrior like man that is
too harsh and this is not good for economy and this not good
to penetrate more the economic market of others to become more rich,
other than that Donald Trump is poor in the criterion of hard scientific
discipline that is required by the definition of wisdom
that i have given before , Donald Trump and the like must be
forbiden from presidency.
Now i turn back with a new proof of wisdom as a criterion...
Wisdom by definition is more rationality and more logic,
and wisdom dictate also that in politics and our philosophy
we have and we must be allowed to penetrate the economic market
of others, because the Liberalism philosophy brings some wisdom
that is in concordance with wisdom and that improve the chance of
survival and chance of success, so those wisdoms of the Liberalism
philosophy that allows us to penetrate the economic market of others,
makes us also more friends in this world, because this idea
of the Liberalism philosophy is beautiful compared with the harsh
philosophies that have existed before like nazism and harsh
nationalism, it is why i have said that Donald Trump is
too harsh because it is a warrior like man that is too harsh ,
he is too harsh like a harsh nationalism that is in contradiction
with the wisdom and idea of Liberalism that i have just insisted
upon it and that allows us to penetrate the econmomic market to
become more rich.
This is my wisdom and proof of a good arab.
Here is another wisdom of my own a good arab:
A harsh nationalism or a harsh life is not good for the economic
market, to optimize more the economic market we have to think
best about rendering this life more beautiful, because fuzzy
logic says that to higher the probability of consuming more and
buying more goods we must be more friends and we must be more happy
and we must be more confident.
This wisdom of my own is in concordance with the philosophy
of social Liberalism.
I am a good arab and not a muslim...
And here is my proof about islamism..
We must take with care islamism, because the empiric facts
says that islamism has render itself too violent and
too harsh, so the idea is to penetrate the ideology
of islamism and understand it more and bring facts from
the Koran and hadiths to make islamism more compatible
with democracy and to render it more compatible with
the wisdom of social Liberalism that allows us
to penetrate the economic market of others to become
more rich and more prosperious, so i think that
ISIS and Al Qaida are in contradiction with this
wisdom and that makes the ideology of ISIS and
Al Qaida not suitable for a more optimal economic
market and that's bad for Irak and for Syria and
the like.
Here is my proof about how to enforce a beautiful morality.
How can we do it without doing it the way of the Bible
or the Koran.
Here is how:
You can get morality from the wisdom of Liberalism
because i have said before that:
A harsh nationalism or a harsh life is not good for the economic
market, to optimize more the economic market we have to think
best about rendering this life more beautiful, because fuzzy
logic says that to higher the probability of consuming more and
buying more goods we must be more friends and we must be more happy
and we must be more confident.
So the requirement to make this life more beautiful is to take into
account morality and you have to have a beautiful moral.
There are americans that are disliking blacks for them
saying that blacks have bad character and are not civilized...
Here is my proof of how to moralize the blacks with a beautiful moral:
The blacks wants to make money, but this requirement is
constrained by the logical fact that to higher your
chance to make money or more money you have to have
people more confident and more happy, because
when people are more confident and more happy
they consume more and they buy more goods..
so the morality of blacks must be constrained with
this principal of Liberalism, and Liberalism
must be constrained with a beautiful morality,
and the life as whole must be constrained also
by this principal that makes this life more beautiful,
so blacks have no choice to render themselves more
beautiful and to render there moral more beautiful
to make also money and more money.
Here is my proof at how must be the political system...
I have said before that:
The blacks wants to make money, but this requirement is
constrained by the logical fact that to higher your
chance to make money or more money you have to have
people more confident and more happy, because
when people are more confident and more happy
they consume more and they buy more goods..
so the morality of blacks must be constrained with
this principal of Liberalism, and Liberalism
must be constrained with a beautiful morality,
and the life as whole must be constrained also
by this principal that makes this life more beautiful,
so blacks have no choice to render themselves more
beautiful and to render there moral more beautiful
to make also money and more money.
So as you have noticed in my proof that life must
be constrained with a beautiful moral, but is this
beautiful moral allowing the rich to be rich?
of course yes ! because you have to allow to rich
to be rich because this optimize more the economic system
and the science and technology, because when there is
more money there is more capability..but you have to constrain
the rich and impose and tax it with a certain percentage that
permit to redistribute the richness to a certain point to allow
the system to be more social and so that the moral to be beautiful ,
because i have said that the principal of Liberalism that is a must
requirement dictates to us that we must have a beautiful moral.
And here is my wisdom of a good arab for today:
In politics you have to know and be capable on making
tradoffs in one area to gain advantages in other areas.
A warrior like person that is too harsh can not fulfill
this requirement that is in concordance with wisdom that
is in concordance with rationality and logic.
Here is another of my wisdom of a good arab for today...
When you say: 2 + 2 = 4
You will say that it`s simple math..
But it`s not just simple math, because it`s a great
wisdom, because in this mathematical equality you
have to have empirical knowledge before making this
theoritical math equation, so you have to know that 2
correspond to 2 objects for example in the empirical world,
and you have to know that the sign + correspond to an add
in the empirical world, and also you have to not forget
about the 2 and you have to not forget about the 4,
so by logical inference this will learn us that
politics is the same as mathematics, because when
you have to not forget the 2 in the math equation
above, you have also to not forget some variables
when you are reasonning in politics, and when you
are making the relation that is add in the equation
that is above, in politics also you have to make logical
and mathematical relations to make a good reasonning,
so politics must be the same as mathematics, because
it must be more rational and more logic, because
wisdom is more rationality and more logic and not
less rationality and less logic.
My wisdom now about fuzzy logic...
As i said before you have to take into consideration
not only boolean logic but also fuzzy logic...
When a neo-nazi or far-right person that is a warrior
like person make a reasonning , it uses too much boolean logic
and neglect fuzzy logic, and that`s a defect in the neo-nazi
and far-right ideologies and the like, because as i said before
you have to higher your chance of survival and your chance of
success by allowing to penetrate the economic market
of others, and doing so you must be capable of making
tradoffs in one area to gain advantages in other areas.
A warrior like person that is too harsh can not fulfill
this requirement that is in concordance with wisdom that
is in concordance with rationality and logic, so we have to
forbid the far-right and neo-nazi kind of ideologies from
governing.
As i said before , politics is like mathematics, you have
to be more rational and more logic and more serious in politics.
I have come to very important subject...
And rationality and logic have to dictate to me
my way of thinking and answering this important question
about Free Software Fondation, this is my wisdom and
this is wisdom, so what is the very important principal
of Free Software Fondation, it's that it is a social act
that has as a principal objective to reduce social darwinism,
and as i said this is a honorable principal and act of
Free Software Fondation, but this honorable principal and act
must be constrained to not be transformed in an act of social darwinism,
because how can we make a living easily if it's Free
like in Free Sofware Fondation, so we have to build with wisdom
and be careful to not constain with this act of Free Sofware Fondation
to avoid the disavantages that we can get from it, and
those disavantages are to be able to balance between Free
and not Free to make it more easy for devellopers of Freewares
and Free Softwares to survive easily... this is a principal
fondation of wisdom that is in accordance with rationality and
logic, because this is an act of beauty that higher the chance
of surviving and higher the chance of success, this beauty is
also the base fondation for the principal of Liberalism that
allow us to penetrate the economic markets of others so that to
become more rich, so that to become more capable, and as i said
that wisdom dictate that we have to allow the rich to be rich
because when you are more rich you are more capable
and this is good for science and technology and this
is a light for humanity, but we have to constrain
the rich by impose him and taxing him with a certain
percentage to redistribute more this wealth as
social acts so that to make the life more beautiful because
this is a requirement to make the economic system more optimal,
because when the life is more beautiful that means that
the people are more confident and happy so they will consume
and buy more goods...
I have talked before about the equation 2+2=4
and i have said that although it's a simple mathematical
equation , i have proved to you that it's in fact a great wisdom,
so from this proof i will infer that morality is dependant
on others nations, that means that morality is constrained
by how other nations are beautiful, because if the other
are a little bit harsh or immoral , this will affect the variable
that is the efficiency and performance of the economic system,
because it will cause that the others will have more difficulty
to penetrate our economic market, and this will affect negatively
this very basis principal of Liberalism that belong to the set
of beauty, and the economic system is what makes us live and survive,
so the economic system is so important to us, so from this
we can infer by rationality and logic that morality must be
taken with care and must be approximated with a beautiful
morality so that to make the economic system more efficient and
more strong. My proof works the same and apply to the morality
inside the nation as i have proved it in my previous post.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.