Richard Heathfield
1/2/2016 10:02:00 PM
On 02/01/16 22:18, Ramine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have affirmed about Java that:
>
> >you can do with it such us web programming, and
> >GUI programming, and concurrent programming, and
> >database programming, and Hard realtime software
> >systems programming etc. with easy, and Java is
> >really suitable for relatime safety critical systems...
>
>
> And Richard Heathfield has responded and affirmed that:
>
> >Sun doesn't agree with you. Here, for example, is
> > an extract from >their licence agreement for Java:
> >"Licensee acknowledges that Software is not designed or
> >intended for use in the design, construction,
> >operation or maintenance of any nuclear facility.
> >Sun Microsystems, Inc. disclaims any express or
> >implied warranty of fitness for such uses."
>
>
> What don't understand Richard Heathfiled
Typographical errors are normally ignored on Usenet unless they are
significant, but it is simple courtesy to spell people's names
correctly. You have already been called out on this a couple of times.
> is that he is basing its
> reasonning on boolean logic, but me, i am basing my logic
> on a good logic approximation because i am often writing
> rapidly my answers and posts in this forum..
If you were to think more quickly and write more slowly, your articles
in this newsgroup would probably improve in quality.
>
> So Richard Heathfiled is saying that you can not use Sun or Oracle Java
> with Realtime Satefty critical systems...
What I'm saying is that, if Sun themselves are nervous about the idea,
then it's probably unwise to claim that Java is the best language for
this kind of task without first going to great lengths to ascertain
whether that claim is true. It is not evident on the strength of your
articles here that you are able to do this.
> Use this Java VM for hard realtime:
Your imperative is noted, but lacks authority.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within