[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework

Oh my God

Leon_Amirreza

10/2/2008 8:06:00 AM

1- i can have a worse case on c#?! cant I? because the target is less
capable of Intel core dou
and because of scheduling overhead and because of .net overhead
and Joreon you are right depends on these and that is why i need these
insight info ( i have the exact target plaftform info and capabilitis but
not .Net)
and i have run my algorithm many times that gives an statistical average
running time with some tolerance thats all; simple and effective i have done
these kind of benchmarkings and wasnt so far from the reality (I am
interested in exact microsencod running time but and average) by microsecond
I meant i have used this resolution in calculation time with windows Perf
Counter not Environment.TickCounts thats all


thank you for your time but STILL you havent answered mine questiuon!

4 Answers

Michael Nemtsev [MVP]

10/2/2008 10:16:00 PM

0

Hello Leon_Amirreza,

The question is that all windows system is "un-real" system.
You can't control your performance in miliseconds.
It's standard behaviour, because the standard delay is about 10ms

If you need something faster - go to the QNX or other industrial OS

---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [Microsoft MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.c...
:: http://twitter.c...

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo


L> 1- i can have a worse case on c#?! cant I? because the target is less
L> capable of Intel core dou
L> and because of scheduling overhead and because of .net overhead
L> and Joreon you are right depends on these and that is why i need
L> these
L> insight info ( i have the exact target plaftform info and capabilitis
L> but
L> not .Net)
L> and i have run my algorithm many times that gives an statistical
L> average
L> running time with some tolerance thats all; simple and effective i
L> have done
L> these kind of benchmarkings and wasnt so far from the reality (I am
L> interested in exact microsencod running time but and average) by
L> microsecond
L> I meant i have used this resolution in calculation time with windows
L> Perf
L> Counter not Environment.TickCounts thats all
L> thank you for your time but STILL you havent answered mine questiuon!
L>


Leon_Amirreza

10/3/2008 5:45:00 AM

0

Thank you very much

"Michael Nemtsev [MVP]" <nemtsev@msn.com> wrote in message
news:900895ec7187d8caf3476406a280@msnews.microsoft.com...
> Hello Leon_Amirreza,
>
> The question is that all windows system is "un-real" system.
> You can't control your performance in miliseconds. It's standard
> behaviour, because the standard delay is about 10ms
>
> If you need something faster - go to the QNX or other industrial OS
>
> ---
> WBR, Michael Nemtsev [Microsoft MVP] :: blog:
> http://spaces.live.c... :: http://twitter.c...
>
> "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
> miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
>
> L> 1- i can have a worse case on c#?! cant I? because the target is less
> L> capable of Intel core dou
> L> and because of scheduling overhead and because of .net overhead
> L> and Joreon you are right depends on these and that is why i need
> L> these
> L> insight info ( i have the exact target plaftform info and capabilitis
> L> but
> L> not .Net)
> L> and i have run my algorithm many times that gives an statistical
> L> average
> L> running time with some tolerance thats all; simple and effective i
> L> have done
> L> these kind of benchmarkings and wasnt so far from the reality (I am
> L> interested in exact microsencod running time but and average) by
> L> microsecond
> L> I meant i have used this resolution in calculation time with windows
> L> Perf
> L> Counter not Environment.TickCounts thats all
> L> thank you for your time but STILL you havent answered mine questiuon!
> L>
>

Alvin Bruney [ASP.NET MVP]

10/4/2008 10:14:00 PM

0

Why would you take the Lord's name in vain for a C# problem?

--
Want a free copy of VS 2008 w/ MSDN premium subscription?
Details at http://msmvps.com/blogs/alvin/De...

Auther Plug
OWC Blackbook now on download at www.lulu.com/owc

"Leon_Amirreza" <r_rahmaty@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:#VBm7sRJJHA.4996@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Thank you very much
>
> "Michael Nemtsev [MVP]" <nemtsev@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:900895ec7187d8caf3476406a280@msnews.microsoft.com...
>> Hello Leon_Amirreza,
>>
>> The question is that all windows system is "un-real" system.
>> You can't control your performance in miliseconds. It's standard
>> behaviour, because the standard delay is about 10ms
>>
>> If you need something faster - go to the QNX or other industrial OS
>>
>> ---
>> WBR, Michael Nemtsev [Microsoft MVP] :: blog:
>> http://spaces.live.c... :: http://twitter.c...
>>
>> "The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and
>> we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
>>
>> L> 1- i can have a worse case on c#?! cant I? because the target is less
>> L> capable of Intel core dou
>> L> and because of scheduling overhead and because of .net overhead
>> L> and Joreon you are right depends on these and that is why i need
>> L> these
>> L> insight info ( i have the exact target plaftform info and capabilitis
>> L> but
>> L> not .Net)
>> L> and i have run my algorithm many times that gives an statistical
>> L> average
>> L> running time with some tolerance thats all; simple and effective i
>> L> have done
>> L> these kind of benchmarkings and wasnt so far from the reality (I am
>> L> interested in exact microsencod running time but and average) by
>> L> microsecond
>> L> I meant i have used this resolution in calculation time with windows
>> L> Perf
>> L> Counter not Environment.TickCounts thats all
>> L> thank you for your time but STILL you havent answered mine questiuon!
>> L>
>>
>

commander Serk , military spokesperson for United ethnic Chinese Wa Army of Shan state of

10/7/2009 12:59:00 AM

0

On Oct 6, 2:26 pm, "Jesus Christ , St. Mary 's cunt ' s faithful
Fucker , is the Unique son of God" <veak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 7:40 am, prophet Muhammud  the  Child  Fucker
>
> <mohamedholy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > beware  of  this  Chinese poster  called  Sothy who
> >  is  using a Khmer  name  to  fake as  a  Khmer .
>
> > this  Chinese  poster  Sothy  wants  to  stop
> > all  discussions  concerning  the  Chinese in ASEAN
> > on  this   forum
> > by his  blocking  of all   subjects  of  discussion concerning
> > the Chinese  in ASEAN  ,
> >  on this  forum ,
> >  as  SPAM  .
>
> > you  should  be  aware  of this   Chinese  Sothy  ,
> > but  this  is  not a  surprise  by  any  mean ,
>
> > because  Chinese  are  faking to
> >  be   Thai  ,
> > to  be Indonesians,
> > to be Malaysians ,
> > to  be  Singaporeans ,
> > to be  Lao ,
> > to  be  Vietnamese ,
> > to  be  Burmese ,
> > to  be   Japanese,
> > and  to be  Filipino .