microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

(Edward G. Nilges)

11/6/2009 10:53:00 AM

On Nov 6, 4:37 pm, Richard Heathfield <r...@see.sig.invalid> wrote:
> In <slrnhf7mub.4ja.usenet-nos...@guild.seebs.net>, Seebs wrote:
> > On 2009-11-06,spinoza1111<spinoza1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >> #include <stdio.H>
> >> #include <stdlib.H>
>
> > You already caught these.
>
> Clearly not. He's been told about them, and *still* hasn't fixed them.

Corporatese: the incompetent manager pretends to be the disapproving
Parent. You're not my boss and you never will be. Nor would I hire
you. So don't waste my time.

I don't want nits from either of you nitwits, Richard and Peter. I
want real problem reports. I don't have to conform to your standards,
because your standards are dysfunctional.

I think what bothers you clowns is that working a few hours on my
commute, I can craft a solution that works (with commonsense clerical
changes on your system) in a language I don't like and which I haven't
used for almost twenty years, whereas you could not do this, not in a
million years, in an unfamiliar language. I'd dare ya to do the
problem in C Sharp: you can get C Sharp free. But you won't try
because you're incompetent.
>
> I see no point in reviewing his code until it compiles reasonably
> cleanly.
>
> <snip>
>
> >> // ***** Function index ******************************************
> >> #define ADDFACTOR > >>         int addFactor(char *strInfix, > >>                       char *strPolish, > >>                       int *intPtrIndex, > >>                       int intEnd, > >>                       int intMaxPolishLength)
> >> ADDFACTOR;
>
> > As commented elsewhere, this doesn't buy you very much.
>
> He's trying to avoid duplication, presumably because he doesn't
> realise the compiler will warn him if an inconsistency arises between
> declaration and definition.
>
> >> // ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> // Command line handler
> >> //
> >> // int main(int intArgCount, char **strArgs)
>
> > Right here, you instantly dispelled any possibility of a gain
> > occurring from the #defines above, because you're duplicating the
> > text anyway.
>
> Quite so.
>
> <snip>
>
> --
> Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax....
> Email: -http://www. +rjh@
> "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
> Sig line vacant - apply within