Yes that helps a lot, I actually thought of making SingleTon MBRO as
Singleton, but then stop, at the point that hey, as already this object is A
Singleton, but then in your design, it makes me simple to access the static
instance of SingleTon object. Thanks.
"Ken Kolda" <ken.kolda@elliemae-nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:%23%23G3d7dmEHA.2772@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Assuming it's your single-call object accessing your singleton, you can do
> this two ways:
>
> 1) Marshal your singleton manually instead of using the
> RemotingConfiguration.RegisterWellKnownServerObject(). This will allow you
> to create a static instance of your remoted class which is accessible both
> by remote objects and objects in the same AppDomain. For example:
>
> class MySingletonObject : MarshalByRefObject
> {
> public static MySingletonObject RemotedObject = new
MySingletonObject();
> }
>
> class MyServer
> {
> public static void Main()
> {
> // Marshal object manually
> RemotingServices.Marshal(MySingletoneObject.RemotedObject,
> "Singleton.rem");
> }
> }
>
> class MySingleCallObject : MarshalbyRefObject
> {
> public void SomMethod()
> {
> MySingletonObject.RemotedObject.SomeOtherMethod();
> }
> }
>
>
> 2) You can actually make your server a client of itself. In your
SingleCall
> object's methods, you would use Activator.GetObject() to fetch a reference
> to the Singleton. This will be slower because you're actually going out
thru
> remoting and back in with each method call, but it requires less work.
Plus,
> if the object you're calling is SingleCall instead of Singleton, this is
the
> only way to do it (beside various techniques of wrapping the single-call
> object).
>
> Hope that helps -
> Ken
>
>
> "Lord2702" <Lord2702@MSN.com> wrote in message
> news:%234a0hCdmEHA.3352@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Mon. Sep. 13, 2004 1:20 PM PT
> >
> > Suppose, I have a server, which hosts two MBRO's, one is SingleCall
> > (MBRO_One) and another is SingleTon (MBRO_Two). Both hosts on one
server,
> > Now, client will call a function from MBRO_One, which further calls a
> > function in MBRO_Two. Is it possible to place this call. If possible,
then
> > how do I activate the MBRO_Two object, on MBRO_One object side. Because
> Both
> > these objects are on one AppDomain, whereas Client is on separate
domain.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
>
>