[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.caching

full ecm2001 titanium crack torrent rapidshare download free zD^zLU!S#E

ecm2001 winols cpwin rapidshare torrent

10/8/2009 4:05:00 AM

We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle,
Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel,
Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!!

email = yshowsoft@???
email = yshowsoft at gmail.com


ecm2001 titanium download
ecm2001 titanium rapidshare
titanium ecm2001 torrent
ecm2001 titanium crack
ecm2001 titanium v 5.3
titanium ecm2001 v 5.4
titanium ecm2001 v 5.5
titanium ecm2001 v 6.0
titanium ecm2001 v 6.1
ecm2001 v 6.2
ecm2001 v 6.3

ecm2001 v5.3
ecm2001 v5.4
ecm2001 v5.5
ecm2001 v6.0
ecm2001 v6.1
ecm2001 v6.2
ecm2001 v6.3



If you have some protected program, and want to crack it, we can help you!

Ecm2001 v6.3 professional, all checksums enabled download


SHOEMASTER v3.04 all modules download

Victor EAT Designscope 2.05 all modules

Ricardo Wave Software 5.1 r

Elcometer EDCS Plus +

Optitex 9.03 and 9.2 all modules

DVP 5.3 Complete W/S, Aero Triangulation, Vectorization, AT, Orthomosaic

SDS Steel Detailing System v 6.34 Full

Aspen Oneliner/Power Flow version 9 crack

SES CDEGS 10.1.6 Full - All modules crack
ecmfull

Scanvec Amiable Flexi Family 7.6
Scanvec Amiable FlexiSIGN PRO 7.5
Scanvec Amiable Flexi EXPERT
Scanvec Amiable FlexiSIGN
Scanvec Amiable FlexiLETTER
Scanvec Amiable FlexiDESIGNER
Scanvec Amiable PhotoPRINT Family 4
Scanvec Amiable PhotoPRINT SERVER PRO
Scanvec Amiable PhotoPRINT SERVER
Scanvec Amiable PhotoPRINT DX
Scanvec Amiable PhotoPRINT SE
Scanvec Amiable EnRoute Family 3
Scanvec Amiable EnRoute Pro
Scanvec Amiable EnRoute Plus
Scanvec Amiable EnRoute Basic
Scanvec Amiable EnRoute Wood

Bentley Advanced Routing and Permitting System (ARPS)
Bentley AutoPLANT Equipment
Bentley AutoPLANT Isometrics
Bentley AutoPLANT P&ID
Bentley AutoPLANT Structural Detailer
Bentley AutoPLANT Structural Engineering
Bentley AutoPLANT Structural Modeler
Bentley Architecture 8
Bentley Arenium
Bentley AutoPIPE
Bentley AXSYS Engine
Bentley AXSYS Integrity
Bentley AXSYS Process
Bentley CloudWorx 03
Bentley Coax
Bentley Connectors
Bentley Copper
Bentley Data Manager
Bentley Datasheets
Bentley Descartes 8
Bentley Driver Packs
Bentley eWarehouse
Bentley Explorer 2004
Bentley Explorer Interference Detection
Bentley Explorer NWD Export
Bentley Explorer Photorealism
Bentley Facilities Inquirer
Bentley Facilities Manager
Bentley Facilities Planner
Bentley Facilities Reports
Bentley Fiber
Bentley Geo Web Publisher
Bentley Geospatial Management
Bentley Hookups
Bentley HVAC 8
Bentley I/RAS B
Bentley Inside Plant
Bentley Instrumentation & Wiring
Bentley Interference Manager
Bentley Knowledge Manager
Bentley MXRAIL
Bentley MXRENEW
Bentley MXROAD
Bentley MXSITE
Bentley MXURBAN
Bentley Navigator
Bentley Piping
Bentley PlantFLOW
Bentley PlantSpace IsoExtractor
Bentley PowerCivil
Bentley PowerDraft
Bentley PowerMap
Bentley PowerMap Field
Bentley PowerSurvey
Bentley ProjectWise Connector for ArcGIS Software
Bentley ProjectWise Connector for Oracle
Bentley Publisher
Bentley PULS
Bentley Redline
Bentley Structural
Bentley Transportation Data Manager (TDM)
Bentley View
Bentley Vision
Bentley Wastewater
Bentley Water
Bentley CivilStorm
Bentley CulvertMaster
Bentley Darwin Calibrator
Bentley Darwin Designer
Bentley Digital InterPlot
Bentley Elementary Electrical Diagrams (EED)
Bentley FlowMaster
Bentley GeoMacao
Bentley GEOPAK Bridge
Bentley GEOPAK Civil Engineering Suite
Bentley GEOPAK Rebar
Bentley GEOPAK Site
Bentley GEOPAK Survey
Bentley HAMMER
Bentley InRail
Bentley InRoads 2004
Bentley InRoads Bridge
Bentley InRoads Site
Bentley InRoads Site Suite
Bentley InRoads Storm & Sanitary
Bentley InRoads Suite
Bentley InRoads Survey
Bentley Location Data Manager (LDM)
Bentley Location Data Manager Express (LDMx)
Bentley MicroStation
Bentley MicroStation GeoGraphics
Bentley PlantSpace Equipment
Bentley PlantSpace Isometrics
Bentley PlantSpace Orthographics
Bentley PlantSpace P&ID
Bentley PlantSpace Raceways
Bentley PlantSpace SupportModeler
Bentley PondPack
Bentley ProjectWise
Bentley ProjectWise Extensions
Bentley Right of Way Office
Bentley SewerCAD
Bentley SewerGEMS
Bentley Skelebrator
Bentley StormCAD
Bentley WaterCAD
Bentley WaterGEMS
Bentley WaterSAFE
Bentley WinNOZL

email = yshowsoft@???
email = yshowsoft at gmail.com


oz=^gf*E^U
7 Answers

James Kuyper

10/21/2009 6:26:00 PM

0

Andy wrote:
....
> My code was developed on a machine with 8bytes for int. So I kept
> everything in int. Right now I am using a machine which by default
> assigns 4bytes for int. So I am wondering how could I compile int as
> 8bytes without modifying the code. It is a scientific application, so
> I really need 64 bit.

So why not switch ti a type guaranteed to have at least 64 bits, such as
long long, int_fast64_t, int_least64_t, or int64_5?

Andy

10/21/2009 6:33:00 PM

0

On Oct 21, 11:26 am, James Kuyper <jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Andy wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > My code was developed on a machine with 8bytes for int. So I kept
> > everything in int. Right now I am using a machine which by default
> > assigns 4bytes for int. So I am wondering how could I compile int as
> > 8bytes without modifying the code. It is a scientific application, so
> > I really need 64 bit.
>
> So why not switch ti a type guaranteed to have at least 64 bits, such as
> long long, int_fast64_t, int_least64_t, or int64_5?

It should be done at the first place. Right now I learned. is there
anyway to fix it without modifying the code?

Thanks,
A.W.

James Kuyper

10/21/2009 6:47:00 PM

0

Andy wrote:
> On Oct 21, 11:26???am, James Kuyper <jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> Andy wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> My code was developed on a machine with 8bytes for int. So I kept
>>> everything in int. Right now I am using a machine which by default
>>> assigns 4bytes for int. So I am wondering how could I compile int as
>>> 8bytes without modifying the code. It is a scientific application, so
>>> I really need 64 bit.
>> So why not switch ti a type guaranteed to have at least 64 bits, such as
>> long long, int_fast64_t, int_least64_t, or int64_5?
>
> It should be done at the first place. Right now I learned. is there
> anyway to fix it without modifying the code?

No. As far as I can tell, the closest you can come to doing that is the
-m64, which makes long a 64-bit type.

user923005

10/21/2009 6:49:00 PM

0

On Oct 21, 11:32 am, Andy <wherea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 11:26 am, James Kuyper <jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > Andy wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > > My code was developed on a machine with 8bytes for int. So I kept
> > > everything in int. Right now I am using a machine which by default
> > > assigns 4bytes for int. So I am wondering how could I compile int as
> > > 8bytes without modifying the code. It is a scientific application, so
> > > I really need 64 bit.
>
> > So why not switch ti a type guaranteed to have at least 64 bits, such as
> > long long, int_fast64_t, int_least64_t, or int64_5?
>
> It should be done at the first place. Right now I learned. is there
> anyway to fix it without modifying the code?

There are a few compilers which have int = 64 bits on 64 bit hardware
(even though this is a very sensible default), but almost all of them
have not done it that way. So (for instance) for an Intel platform I
think it will be very hard to find a compiler that does what you want.

I suggest that if you have a very specific platform in mind, you might
check for a compiler that has that option. I think it very doubtful
that you will find one.
See (for instance):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w...
http://en.wikipedia.org/w...

You need ILP64 or SILP64.

user923005

10/21/2009 10:48:00 PM

0

On Oct 21, 12:35 pm, Keith Thompson <ks...@mib.org> wrote:
> "BGB / cr88192" <cr88...@hotmail.com> writes:
> [...]
>
> > maybe try:
> > #define int long long
>
> > but, alas, this is still generally an ill-advised strategy.
> > better would be to go and change the code...
>
> Yes, there are a *lot* of ways this can go wrong.  One example:
>
>     short int x;
>
> would expand to
>
>     short long long x;

even more humorous example:

int main()

would expand to:

long long main(void)

and in general, any API call is going to get munged into something
else.

Global search and replace is not a sensible option.

> And, as I mentioned elsethread, interfacing with outside code,
> including the OS and standard library, is going to be difficult
> or impossible.
>
> I think it would be much easier to fix the code so it actually uses
> long long (or int64_t, or int64least_t, or int64fast_t) where
> appropriate.

Amen.

John Doe

10/22/2009 6:56:00 PM

0

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:48:49 -0700, user923005 wrote:

> There are a few compilers which have int = 64 bits on 64 bit hardware
> (even though this is a very sensible default),

The problem is that "char" really *has* to be 8-bit, so if it "int" is
64-bit, "short" can be either 16-bit or 32-bit, but the other one ceases
to be available.

Also, C's type promotion rules mean that anything smaller than an "int"
gets promoted to an "int" at the drop of a hat, which makes working with
code which was written assuming a 32-bit "int" a nightmare.

It's much easier to have a 32-bit "int" and a 64-bit "long", so that you
can work with both 32-bit and 64-bit values without excessive promotions.

Although, even that was too much trouble for Windows, which is heavily
tied to the 80386 architecture, so Win64 has a 32-bit "long" as well.

> but almost all of them
> have not done it that way. So (for instance) for an Intel platform I
> think it will be very hard to find a compiler that does what you want.

What use would such a compiler be? You wouldn't be able to use any of the
standard headers; wherever the headers say "int", the corresponding object
code in the libraries will be assuming a 32-bit value. All of the popular
OSes for x86_64 (i.e. Win32, Win64, Linux, MacOSX, *BSD) use a 32-bit "int".

> You need ILP64 or SILP64.

IOW, you need the HP (formerly Compaq (formerly DEC)) Alpha architecture.

user923005

10/22/2009 8:22:00 PM

0

On Oct 22, 11:55 am, Nobody <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:48:49 -0700, user923005 wrote:
> > There are a few compilers which have int = 64 bits on 64 bit hardware
> > (even though this is a very sensible default),
>
> The problem is that "char" really *has* to be 8-bit, so if it "int" is
> 64-bit, "short" can be either 16-bit or 32-bit, but the other one ceases
> to be available.
>
> Also, C's type promotion rules mean that anything smaller than an "int"
> gets promoted to an "int" at the drop of a hat, which makes working with
> code which was written assuming a 32-bit "int" a nightmare.
>
> It's much easier to have a 32-bit "int" and a 64-bit "long", so that you
> can work with both 32-bit and 64-bit values without excessive promotions.
>
> Although, even that was too much trouble for Windows, which is heavily
> tied to the 80386 architecture, so Win64 has a 32-bit "long" as well.
>
> > but almost all of them
> > have not done it that way.  So (for instance) for an Intel platform I
> > think it will be very hard to find a compiler that does what you want.
>
> What use would such a compiler be? You wouldn't be able to use any of the
> standard headers; wherever the headers say "int", the corresponding object
> code in the libraries will be assuming a 32-bit value. All of the popular
> OSes for x86_64 (i.e. Win32, Win64, Linux, MacOSX, *BSD) use a 32-bit "int".
>
> > You need ILP64 or SILP64.
>
> IOW, you need the HP (formerly Compaq (formerly DEC)) Alpha architecture.

It is not just a function of the hardware, but also a function of the
compiler.

Consider:
Next Cmd: type t.c
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
printf("size of char is %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(char));
printf("size of short is %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(short));
printf("size of int is %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(int));
printf("size of long is %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(long));
printf("size of long long is %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(long
long));
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
Next Cmd: run t
size of char is 1
size of short is 2
size of int is 4
size of long is 4
size of long long is 8
Next Cmd: sho cpu

ALPHA1, a AlphaStation 200 4/100
Multiprocessing is DISABLED. Uniprocessing synchronization image
loaded.
Minimum multiprocessing revision levels: CPU = 1